CRITICAL STUDY OF THE COMMERCIAL WISDOM OF COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS UNDER IBC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.4784Keywords:
Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code (Ibc), Committee Of Creditors (Coc), Commercial WisdomAbstract [English]
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016, shaped by the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee, aims to create a structured, time-bound resolution framework for corporate insolvency in India. A key principle of the code is the role of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), empowered to make decisions based on commercial wisdom, which courts typically refrain from interfering with unless the decisions are irrational or unlawful. The CoC’s primary function is to protect creditors’ interests and maximize asset recovery, while balancing the rights of various stakeholders, including operational creditors. Judicial scrutiny of commercial wisdom has evolved through landmark judgments, emphasizing minimal intervention unless legal violations or bad faith are evident. Despite the code’s successes, challenges such as delays, recovery rates, and the exclusion of non-CoC creditors remain. The study suggests that while the CoC's role is vital, there is a need to ensure inclusive decision-making and focus on corporate revival rather than liquidation. Ultimately, the IBC seeks to create an ecosystem that fosters business revival and value preservation, but its success depends on efficient, stakeholder-aligned practices.
References
Dr T K Viswanathan – The Report of the Bankruptcy Law Reforms Committee dated 04-11-2015
Essar Steel India Ltd (CoC) Vs Satish Kumar Gupta (2020) 8 SCC 531
K Sasidhar v Indian Overseas Bank (2019) 12 SCC 150
Kalparaj Dharamshi Vs Kotak Investment Advisors Ltd (2021) 10 SCC 401
Arcelor Mittal India Pvt Ltd vs Satish Kumar Gupta (2019) 2 SCC 1
Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd v UOI (2019) 4 SCC 17
Arun Kumar J Vs Jindal Steel & Power Ltd AIR 2021 SC 1563
Videocon Industries Ltd 2018 SCC online NCLT 13182
Rajagopalan Case – NCLT Chennai Dated 17-03-2023
Siva Industries & Holdings Case – Supreme Court Civil Appeal No 18111812 of 2022
Jaypee Kensington Case (2021) 12 SCR 603
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Viswajith T. S.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.