NAVIGATING THE DIGITAL DEMOCRACY: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL EXPLORATION OF THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS DISSENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IN THE AGE OF INFORMATIONAL ACTIVISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i7.2024.4636Abstract [English]
In today's digital age, social media has transformed the way individuals communicate, share ideas, and engage in public debates. These platforms offer unprecedented access to information and serve as a space for discussion, activism, and advocacy. However, they also present challenges when it comes to expressing dissent, as digital communication operates within legal frameworks, corporate policies, and ethical boundaries.
References
Rohit Raj, “Defining Contours of Press Freedom in Backdrop of National Emergency of 1975”, All India Reporter (Journal Section), 2008, pp. 155-160, at 160.
Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, Media Ethics (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 354.
“Social Media”, available on the Web, URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/social_media, accessed on 14/4/13.
“Social Media Framework Draft for Public Consultation”, available on the Web, URL: http://www.indiaenvironmetportal.org.in/files/file/SocialMediaFrameworkDraftforPublicConsultation_192011-2.pdf , accessed on 10/4/13.
Andreas M. Kaplan & Michael Haenlein (2010), “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media”, Business Horizons, vol. 53, 2010, pp. 59-68, at 61. 6 Ibid., at 60–61 (noting that Web 2.0 may be contrasted with Web 1.0 platforms, which simply provide content to users without giving them the opportunity to interact with or modify the information online). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
OECD, Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis, and Social Networking, 2007, pp. 1-74, at 8, available on the Web, URL: http://www.oecd.org/sti/38393115.pdf; see also Kaplan & Haenlein, note 5, at 61.
In 2010, Kaplan and Haenlein classified social media into six different types:9
collaborative projects (e.g., Wikipedia),
blogs and micro blogs (e.g., Twitter),
content communities (e.g., YouTube),
social networking sites (e.g., Facebook),
virtual game worlds (e.g., World of War craft), and
virtual social worlds (e.g. Second Life).
UNESCO, Freedom Of Expression Toolkit: A Guide Students, 2013, 1-86, at 16, available on the Web, URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002186/218618e.pdf, accessed on 14/4/13.
“Freedom of Speech”, available on the Web, URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/freedom_of_speech, accessed on 21/4/13. In its landmark judgment, the Indian Supreme Court in the case of the Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting vs. Cricket Association, Bengal with Cricket Association, Bengal vs. Union of India (AIR 1995 SC 1236) has also recognised the ‘right to information’ as part of the fundamental right of speech and expression under Article 19 (1) (a) of the Indian Constitution.
Randal Marlin, Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion (Ontario: Broadview Press, 2002), pp. 226-227.
“Freedom of Expression Everywhere”, available on the Web, URL: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/Freedomofexpressioneverywhere.aspx, accessed on 5/4/13.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Key Trends and Challenges to the Right of All Individuals to Seek, Receive and Impart Information and Ideas of All Kinds through the Internet, 2011, UN General Assembly Doc. A/HRC/17/27. This Report is also available on the web, URL: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G11/132/01/PDF/G1113201.pdf?OpenElement.
“Freedom of Expression and New Media”, available on the Web, URL: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/FreedomExpressionandnewmedia.aspx, accessed on 5/4/13.
Bal Mukund Vyas (2008), “Sharing of Information with citizens”, All India Reporter (Journal Section), 2008, pp. 171-176, at 176.
Justice Rajesh Tandon, “Policing the Web: Free Speech under Attack?”, Lawyers Update, August 2011, also available on the Web, URL: http://lawyersupdate.co.in/LU/7/65.asp, accessed on 24/5/13.
Freedom House, Freedom on the Net, 2012, available on the Web, URL: http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/India%202012.pdf, accessed on 24/5/13.
Reporters without Borders, Internet Enemies Report, 2012, available on the Web, URL: http://march12.rsf.org/i/Report_EnemiesoftheInternet_2012.pdf, accessed on 24/5/13.
Google Seventh Transparency Report can be accessed online, URL: http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/, accessed on 01/5/13.
See Open Net Initiative Report on India. It describes India as a stable democracy with a strong tradition of press freedom, nevertheless continuing its regime of Internet filtering. Report is available on the web, URL: http://access.opennet.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/accesscontested-india.pdf, accessed on 30/4/13.
“Indian Government v Social Networking Sites”, available on the Web, URL: http://barandbench.com/indian_government_v_social_networking_sites.html, accessed on 30/4/12.
Central Board of Film Certification Home Page, http://www.cbfcindia.tn.nic.in/ (last visited Aug. 21, 2008).
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10th December, 1948
Art 19 of Constitution of India
(1954) S.C.R. 587
AIR 1236, 1995 SCC (2) 161
Art 25 (1) of Constitution of India
“Censoring the Internet”, available on the Web, URL: http://barandbench.com/censoring_the_internet.html, accessed on 30/4/13.
India passed the Information Technology Act 2000 in May 2000 in pursuance of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/51/162 of 30th January 1997. This Resolution adopted the Model Law on Electronic Commerce adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. The Information Technology Act, 2000 came into force on 17th October 2000 and it has been substantially amended through the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. It got the Presidential assent on 5th February 2009 and came into force on 27th October 2009.
This writ petition has been filed by Shreya Singhal of Delhi. The writ petition can be accessed online, URL: http://www.scribd.com/doc/115031416/Shreya-Singhal-v-Union-of-India.
See Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, Government of India, Advisory on Implementation of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (9th January 2013), available on the Web, URL: http://deity.gov.in/sites/upload_files/dit/files/Advisoryonsection.pdf.
“Vital Analysis of Freedom of Expression in Social Media: In the Current Indian Scenario”
by Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, 2022 IJRTI | Volume 7, Issue 12 | ISSN: 2456-3315
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pallavi Ligade, Dr. Hema Menon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
