SHACKLES OF SOCIETAL PERCEPTION AGAINST FEMALE AUTONOMY IN KAMALA MARKANDEYA’S NECTAR IN A SIEVE

Abstract [English]

Son preference is often framed as a cultural norm, it functions as a broader economic and social mechanism that marginalizes women. Kamala Markandeya’s Nectar in a Sieve critically examines the deeply entrenched patriarchal structures that perpetuate gender inequality, particularly through the cultural practice of son preference. This paper explores how societal perceptions, economic dependency, and systemic discrimination limit female autonomy in traditional Indian society. By analyzing the protagonist Rukmani’s experiences, the study highlights how son preference restricts women’s access to education, financial independence, and decision-making power, reinforcing their subordinate status. Through an intersectional feminist lens, the paper examines the complex interplay between gender, caste, class, and economic constraints in shaping women’s lives. To move beyond critique, the paper proposes policy-driven feminist solutions to combat gender bias and promote female empowerment. Legal reforms must enforce equal inheritance rights and stricter regulations against sex-selective practices. By integrating feminist theory with policy recommendations, this study emphasizes the urgent need for structural reforms to dismantle gender-based discrimination. A future where women have equal autonomy and agency is possible through collective feminist action, legal frameworks, and economic empowerment initiatives. Markandeya’s work serves as a crucial narrative that not only critiques societal oppression but also inspires forward-looking strategies for achieving gender justice.