RESOLVING HUMAN-WILDLIFE CONFLICT: A CASE STUDY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION STRATEGIES IN PERUVANTHANAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.4364Keywords:
Crop Damage, Mitigation Strategies, Human-Wildlife Conflict, Economic Loss, Wild Animals, Sustainable AgricultureAbstract [English]
Crop destruction caused by wild animals constitutes a significant global challenge, profoundly impacting agricultural communities with far-reaching economic and livelihood consequences. This investigation centres on Peruvanthanam Panchayat in Kerala's Idukki district, a region where wildlife exerts substantial pressure on farmers by severely compromising crop yields. The study meticulously evaluates the extent of crop damage, appraises existing mitigation strategies, and assesses their efficacy. Applying inferential statistics, regression analysis, and sophisticated modelling techniques delves into the socio-economic and ecological drivers of crop depredation. The ultimate goal is to craft actionable, evidence-based recommendations to support local farmers. The findings are essential for achieving a delicate equilibrium between agricultural productivity and wildlife conservation.
References
Dublin, T., & Hoare, R. E. (2004). Addressing human-wildlife conflict: A review of current approaches. African Journal of Ecology, 42(4), 370–380.
Nyhus, P. J. (2003). Human-wildlife conflict and ex gratia compensation payments in Makalu-Barun Conservation Area, Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 30(4), 322–330.
Treves, A., & Karanth, K. U. (2003). Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology, 17(6), 1491–1499.
Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., & Rabinowitz, A. (Eds.). (2005). People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence? Cambridge University Press.
Naughton-Treves, L., & Treves, A. (2005). Socio-ecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: Crop-raiding by elephants and other species in Africa. Conservation Biology, 19(2), 562–569.
Madhusudan, M. D. (2003). Living amidst large wildlife: Livestock and crop depredation by large mammals in the interior villages of Bhadra Tiger Reserve, South India. Environmental Management, 31(4), 466–475.
Graham, M. D., et al. (2009). Human-wildlife conflict: Do sustainable solutions exist? Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14(6), 423–431.
Hoare, R. (2000). African elephants and humans in conflict: The outlook for co-existence. Oryx, 34(1), 34–38.
Karanth, K. U., & Gopal, R. (2005). An ecological and conservation perspective on large carnivore population recovery in India. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(5), 1165–1182.
Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13(5), 458–466.
Zimmermann, A., et al. (2005). Human-wildlife conflict in Southern Africa: Lessons from successful community-based natural resource management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 10(4), 304–307.
Fernando, P., & Pastorini, J. (2011). Range-wide status of Asian elephants. Gajah, 35, 1–8
Sukumar, R. (2003). The Asian elephant: Ecology and management. Cambridge University Press
Wittemyer, G., et al. (2008). Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science, 321(5885), 123–126.
Government of Kerala, Kerala State Planning Board. (2022). Fourteenth Five-Year Plan (2022–2027): Working Group on addressing issues related to human-wildlife interactions in Kerala: Report. Agriculture Division.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jaimol James

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.