FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF INDIAN NSE-LISTED COMPANIES ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURING ACTIVITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i3.2024.4091Keywords:
Financial Performance, Manufacturing Industry, India, MCDM, Entropy, COPRASAbstract [English]
This study evaluated the financial performance of Indian manufacturing companies using an entropy-based COPRAS approach for 2022. A sample of 18 companies was selected from Nifty 50 firms and assessed based on five key financial ratios. The weights for each financial indicator were measured using the entropy method, and the rankings were performed using the COPRAS approach. It was observed that the debt-equity ratio is the most important performance indicator in the analysis, while the Current Ratio obtained the lowest weightage of 0.061. The ranking results indicate that Coal India Ltd. is the best performer during the period, followed by Bajaj Auto Ltd. and Eicher Motors Ltd. On the other hand, Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. received the lowest ranking based on the alternatives' performance score and degree of utility value. The study provides significant insights into the Indian manufacturing industry, efficiency, and areas for improvement for the companies in the sector. The application of MCDM in this context was limited, which encouraged this study.
References
Abdel-Basset, M., Ding, W., Mohamed, R., & Metawa, N. (2020). An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries. Risk management, 22, 192-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-020-00061-4
Abdel-Maksoud, A., Dugdale, D., & Luther, R. (2005). Non-financial performance measurement in manufacturing companies. The British accounting review, 37(3), 261-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2005.03.003
Anthony, P., Behnoee, B., Hassanpour, M., &Pamucar, D. (2019). Financial performance evaluation of seven Indian chemical companies. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(2), 81-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1902021a
Ban, A. I., Ban, O. I., Bogdan, V., Popa, D. C. S., & Tuse, D. (2020). Performance evaluation model of Romanian manufacturing listed companies by fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(4), 808-836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.12367
Baran, J., &Żak, J. (2014). Multiple Criteria Evaluation of transportation performance for selected agribusiness companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111, 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.065
Chand, P., Thakkar, J. J., & Ghosh, K. K. (2020). Analysis of supply chain performance metrics for Indian mining & earthmoving equipment manufacturing companies using hybrid MCDM model. Resources Policy, 68, 101742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101742
Chen, F. H., Hsu, T. S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 908-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.02.001
Dong, J. Y., Chen, Y., & Wan, S. P. (2018). A cosine similarity based QUALIFLEX approach with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for financial performance evaluation. Applied Soft Computing, 69, 316-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.053
Gavalas, D., Syriopoulos, T., &Tsatsaronis, M. (2022). Assessing key performance indicators in the shipbuilding industry; an MCDM approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(4), 463-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1876939
K. Digalwar, A., R. Tagalpallewar, A., & K. Sunnapwar, V. (2013). Green manufacturing performance measures: an empirical investigation from Indian manufacturing industries. Measuring Business Excellence, 17(4), 59-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2012-0046
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Ghadge, A., & Raut, R. (2020). A performance measurement system for industry 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs-A review and empirical investigation. International journal of production economics, 229, 107853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107853
Keramati, A., & Shapouri, F. (2016). Multidimensional appraisal of customer relationship management: integrating balanced scorecard and multi criteria decision making approaches. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 14, 217-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0281-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0281-8
Leachman, C., Pegels, C. C., & Kyoon Shin, S. (2005). Manufacturing performance: evaluation and determinants. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 851-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613938
Parvadavardini, S., Vivek, N., & Devadasan, S. R. (2016). Impact of quality management practices on quality performance and financial performance: evidence from Indian manufacturing companies. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(5-6), 507-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1015411
Pipatprapa, A., Huang, H. H., & Huang, C. H. (2018). Enhancing the effectiveness of AHP for environmental performance assessment of Thailand and Taiwan’s food industry. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 190, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7113-5
Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert systems with applications, 41(16), 7316-7327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.023
Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., Khalili Esbouei, S., & Antucheviciene, J. (2014). Applying fuzzy MCDM for financial performance evaluation of Iranian companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(2), 274-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.913274
Sarraf, F., & Nejad, S. H. (2020). Improving performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard with grey relational analysis and data envelopment analysis approaches: Case study in water and wastewater companies. Evaluation and program planning, 79, 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101762
Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M. R., & Ramezani, I. (2014). Application of fuzzy AHP approach for financial performance evaluation of Iranian petrochemical sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 995-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.352
Shaverdi, M., Ramezani, I., Tahmasebi, R., &Rostamy, A. A. A. (2016). Combining fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS with financial ratios to design a novel performance evaluation model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 18, 248-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0142-8
Varmazyar, M., Dehghanbaghi, M., & Afkhami, M. (2016). A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach. Evaluation and program planning, 58, 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005
Yalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert systems with applications, 39(1), 350-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.024
Yurdakul*, M., & Ic, Y. T. (2005). Development of a performance measurement model for manufacturing companies using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 43(21), 4609-4641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500161746
Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., &Tamošaitiene, J. (2008). Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals. Journal of civil engineering and management, 14(2), 85-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.3
Zhao, H., Zhao, H. and Guo, S. (2018), “Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Electricity Grid Corporations Employing a Novel MCDM Model”, Sustainability Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 10(7), pp. 2130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072130
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Priya Das, Sumanta Debbarma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.