CONSUMER-EXPERT INTERACTION IN PRODUCT CHOICES: REVOLUTIONIZING CONSUMER DYNAMICS WITH AUTONOMOUS EXPERTS IN A MULTIDISCIPLINARY FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.3974Abstract [English]
Consumer dynamics, encompassing preferences, behaviors, and decision-making processes, have grown increasingly intricate within today’s diverse and choice-saturated markets. Autonomous experts—whether human, AI-powered, or hybrid—have emerged as influential facilitators, transforming consumer interactions by offering impartial, empathetic, and technology-enhanced guidance. These experts empower consumers to make informed choices with greater clarity, confidence, and satisfaction.
This study presents a multidisciplinary framework that investigates the critical role autonomous experts play in reshaping consumer decision-making. Incorporating insights from psychology, behavioral economics, marketing, communication studies, and technology, the framework demonstrates how these experts build trust, counteract cognitive biases, and facilitate personalized yet unbiased decisions. By analyzing key interaction stages—such as trust development, needs evaluation, and post-purchase support—the study illustrates how autonomous experts influence and adapt to evolving consumer behaviors.
To bridge theoretical insights with practical applications, the paper examines their role in sectors like retail, healthcare, and financial services, focusing on their ability to address challenges such as decision fatigue, inclusivity, and ethical data practices. By proposing actionable strategies and tackling ethical considerations, this research highlights the transformative potential of autonomous experts and offers a strategic roadmap for revolutionizing consumer engagement.
References
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1465
Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8c77e2f6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Gunning, D., & Aha, D. (2019). DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program. AI Magazine, 40(2), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
IBM Watson Health. (n.d.). IBM Watson Health. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/watson-health
Jannach, D., Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2010). Recommender systems: Challenges and research opportunities. AI Magazine, 31(4), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v31i4.2326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v31i4.2326
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Aldine-Atherton.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(Special Issue), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1252099
Pantano, E., Rese, A., & Baier, D. (2017). Augmented reality in retail: A review of the literature. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(9), 1106–1124. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2016-0222
Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. HarperCollins.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Wilson, C. (2021). The role of adaptive AI in personalizing consumer interactions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 65(3), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.11505
Xu, K., & Jackson, J. (2019). Transparency and trust in AI systems: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 96(4), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.004
Zhu, J., & Huberman, B. A. (2014). To switch or not to switch: Understanding consumer decision-making in the digital age. Decision Support Systems, 65(5), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.05.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rushikesh Dahiwal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
