BEYOND ANTHROPOCENTICISM: A DEEP ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF KATE GRENVILLE’S SARAH THORNHILL

Authors

  • R. Kaveya Ph.D. Scholar, Pachaiyappa’s College, Chennai-30
  • Dr K. R. Vijaya Assistant Professor, Pachaiyappa’s College, Chennai-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.3561

Keywords:

Deep Ecology, Human-Nature Interconnection, Colonial Exploitation, Anthropocentrism, Indigenous Knowledge, Sustainability

Abstract [English]

The study examines Kate Grenville’s Sarah Thornhill through the framework of deep ecological theory, addressing anthropocentric perspectives and highlighting the novel’s promotion of a more interconnected and inclusive relationship between humans and the natural world.Using Val Plumwood’s critique of human-centred hierarchies, the study explores Grenville’s critique of the colonial mindset that elevates human dominance over nature, overlooking the inherent worth of non-human life.Through the narrative, Grenville portrays the interdependence of human and non-human life while critiquing the ecological and cultural consequences of anthropocentrism. Sarah Thornhill emerges as a profound exploration of the moral and ecological responsibilities of colonial societies, promoting a sustainable and inclusive worldview that honours the interconnectedness of all life forms.

References

Plumwood, Val. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Routledge, 2002, p. 03.

Plumwood, Val. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge, 1993, p. 12, 14-15.

Diehm, Christian. Connection to Nature, Deep Ecology, and Conservation Social Science: Human-Nature Bonding and Protecting the Natural World. Lexington Books, 2020, p. 02, 04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781793624215

Grenville, Kate. Sarah Thornhill. W.F. Howes Limited, 2012, p. 17, 20, 35, 50, 303

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

R. Kaveya, & Vijaya, K. R. (2024). BEYOND ANTHROPOCENTICISM: A DEEP ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF KATE GRENVILLE’S SARAH THORNHILL. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.3561