ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND LIVELIHOOD QUESTION THROUGH THE FOREST RIGHTS ACT, 2006 IN TRIPURA

Authors

  • Gouri Kalai Research Scholar, Department of Political Science, MBB University, Agartala, Tripura
  • Dr. Bindu Ranjan Chakma Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, MBB University, Agartala, Tripura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.3547

Keywords:

Sustainable Forest Management, the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA-2006), Tribal Forest Dwellers, Environmental Sustainability, Sustainable Social Development, Sustainable Livelihood, Rubber Plantations

Abstract [English]

Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) is now given top priority for ensuring environmental and social sustainability. As an approach of SFM, the Government of India enacted the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA-2006). The Government of Tripura implemented the FRA, 2006 in 2008 and since then, it introduced and executed various schemes under the FRA, 2006 for social sustainability of the tribal forest dwellers. The paper studies the nature of implementation of the FRA, 2006 in Tripura from the perspective SFM. The study argues that albeit implementation of FRA, 2006 increased income and improved life styles of tribal household beneficiaries, yet due to encouragement of extensive rubber plantation (mono culture) under the implementation of FRA, 2006, it has questioned about environmental sustainability. However, the paper argues that the scope of SFM through the implementation of the FRA, 2006 is extensive if, despite high economic benefits, it can reduce the dependency among the beneficiaries upon rubber plantations and encourage shifting to various other economically and environmentally viable occupations.

References

Bandyopadhyay, Arun (2010). The Colonial Legacy of Forest Policies in India. Social Scientist, 38(1/2), 53-76.

Bhardwaj, Yeshpal, (2022), Sustainable Forest Management, in J. Vonk, T. K. Shackelford (eds), Encyclopaedia of Animal Cognition and Behaviour, Springer International Publishing, 6797-6802. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1602-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55065-7_1602

Brundtland, G.H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987ourcommon-future.pdf , retrieved on December 20, 2023.

Crawford, Young and Miall (2002), on sustainability, https://dspace.nwu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10394/2252/Schutte_IC_Chapter2_Sustainability.pdf, accessed on December 20, 2023.

Cotter and Hannan (1999), on the Principles of sustainability https://dspace.nwu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10394/2252/Schutte_IC_Chapter2_Sustainability.pdf, accessed on December 20, 2023.

Goodland, Robert, (1995), the Concept of Environmental Sustainability, Annu, Rev. Syst. 26:1-24, https://dl1.cuni.cz/pluginfile.php/909144/mod_resource/content/1/Goodland_Environmental%20sustainability.pdf, accessed on December 20, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000245

India State of Forest Report (ISFR), 2019, https://www.drishtiias.com/pdf/1601431652-india-state-of-forest-report-2019.pdf

India State of Forest Report (ISFR) 2021 https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1906388, accessed on February 20, 2024.

Khosla; Ayesha & Bhattacharya; Prodyut (August 2020): Review of Various Initiatives for Tribal Development in Tripura within the purview of Forest Rights Act, International Journal of Research in Social Sciences,10 (8):15-29.

Khosla; Ayesha & Bhattacharya; Prodyut (2018): Tracking the implementation of Forest Rights Act, 2006 and its impact on the livelihood of forest dependent people in the state of Tripura, India, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 23 (3):1-13.

Iglesias, Susanan Dias et. al, 2021, Theoretical Framework for Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility and Change Management, Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 16 (5): 315-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2021.08.025

Lee A. & O’Neil 2004. The concept of sustainability. Accessed 20 December 2023. Retrieved fromhttp://dspace.nwu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10394/2252/Schutte_IC_Chapter2_Sustainability.pdf?sequence=10

Panda, Bijaya and Sarkar, Sukanta (2020), Environmental Impact of Rubber Plantation: Ecological Vs. Economic Perspectives. Asian Jr. of Microbiol. Biotech. Env. Sc. Vol. 22 (4): 657-661, Global Science Publications.

Shitiri; Achumi W. and Johar (2024), Vishal: Eco-climatic Challenges and innovations: Navigating the future of rubber plantations, International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research, 8(6): 459-467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i6f.1349

Roy, A. K, (2020), Impact of Block (Rubber) Plantation in Tripura, Tribal Research and Cultural Institute, Government of Tripura, Agartala.

Singh, Dr. Niraj Kumar (2022). British Forest Policy in India: The Imperial Dilemma, International Journal of Science and Research, 11 (01), 1517-1521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/SR22128085602

Tiwari, B.K. & Phalguni, Kayenpaibam (2006). Ecological Impact of Joint Forest Management in Tripura. India. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2006.008680

Vongkhamheng, C.; Zhou; J.H, Beckline, M. and Phimmachanh; S. (2016), Socioeconomic and Ecological Impact Analysis of Rubber Cultivation in Southeast Asia. 3, e2339, Open Access Library Journal, 3: 8, https://file.scirp.org/pdf/OALibJ_2016071215210491.pdf, https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102339, accessed on December 20, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102339

https://forestrights.tripura.gov.in/Forestrights/dasboard/frmEntryStatus.aspx

https://twd.tripura.gov.in/forest-rights-act-2006

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Kalai, G., & Chakma, B. R. (2024). ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND LIVELIHOOD QUESTION THROUGH THE FOREST RIGHTS ACT, 2006 IN TRIPURA. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(6), 3010–3019. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.3547