QUALITY OF LIFE AT THE MICRO- SCALE: A GEOGRAPHICAL STUDY IN MORADABAD DISTRICT OF UTTAR PRADESH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.3395Keywords:
Quality of Life, Basic Amenities, Socio-Economic Factors, Indicators, Sustainable DevelopmentAbstract [English]
The study "Quality of Life at the Micro-Scale: A Geographical Study in Moradabad District of Uttar Pradesh" explores the intricate dimensions of human well-being at the localized level. It delves into the interplay of physical, social, and economic factors influencing the quality of life in Moradabad, a district marked by its unique socio-economic fabric and cultural heritage. The research employs a geographical approach, combining primary surveys, statistical analyses, and spatial mapping to assess variations in quality of life across different settlements. Key indicators such as housing, education, health, income, and access to basic amenities are evaluated to reveal spatial disparities. The findings underline the need for policy interventions tailored to address localized challenges, ensuring equitable development and improved living standards. This micro-scale analysis not only highlights the region's strengths but also identifies critical areas for strategic planning and sustainable growth.
References
Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing—A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1-2), 19-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7
Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 297-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9191-6
Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1/2), 17-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
Roy, M., & Sen, A. (2021). Quality of life in peri-urban regions: A case study of Kolkata Metropolitan Area. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 5669-5690.
Adhikari, S. (2020). Socio-economic determinants of quality of life in rural India. International Journal of Rural Development, 7(2), 145-155.
Qureshi, A. R., & Khan, S. M. (2017). A spatial analysis of quality of life in Indian cities. Indian Journal of Geography and Environment, 22(1), 45-60.
Rahman, M. M., & Islam, R. (2020). Quality of life and social inequality in South Asia. South Asian Studies, 35(3), 331-350.
Kumar, N., & Mehta, A. (2016). Rural-urban disparity in quality of life in Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Social and Economic Studies, 18(4), 229-247.
Sarkar, A., & Raju, S. (2013). Quality of life in the urban fringe: A case study of Delhi. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 5(2), 187-202.
Pathak, C. S., & Verma, S. (2019). Correlates of quality of life: A micro-level study of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Regional Science, 51(1), 15-32.
Patil, D. S., & Gaikwad, S. M. (2018). Quality of life and socio-economic variables: Evidence from Maharashtra. Journal of Urban Studies, 14(3), 107-119.
Biswas, T., & Sen, S. (2021). Environmental determinants of quality of life in peri-urban India. Geographical Review of India, 83(2), 212-230.
Ahmed, A., & Khan, R. (2020). Spatial patterns of deprivation and quality of life: A case study of Lucknow. Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 16(2), 91-112.
Jha, P., & Ghosh, A. (2015). Regional variations in quality of life in India: An empirical assessment. Social Science Spectrum, 1(1), 55-70.
Singh, R., & Kaur, H. (2017). Quality of life assessment: A case of Punjab villages. Indian Journal of Geography, 49(1), 12-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Amit Kumar, Dr. Gauri Gupta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.