VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INDIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM WITH WESTERN COUNTRIES SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO USA, CANADA, UK, AND AUSTRALIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i3.2024.3279Keywords:
Victim-Centric Approach, Compensation, Victim Impact Statement, Indian Criminal Justice System, Justice, EquityAbstract [English]
The Indian criminal justice system, rooted in principles of justice and equity, faces challenges in adequately addressing the needs of crime victims, often focusing primarily on punishing offenders. This contrasts with practices in Western countries, specifically the USA, Canada, Australia, and the UK, where victim-centric approaches have gained widespread recognition. Globally, there has been growing acknowledgment of the importance of giving crime survivors a voice and recognizing their rights. However, in India, victims have historically been overlooked, with limited opportunities to participate in the justice process. This study explores the legal framework surrounding victims in India and the potential for integrating Victim Impact Statements (VIS) during sentencing. The article aims to assess the efficacy of existing provisions, focusing on the judiciary's role in recognizing victims' rights and needs. By analyzing the comparative status of VIS in India, the USA, Canada, the UK, and Australia, this research identifies the strengths, limitations, and gaps in India's criminal justice system. The study also highlights the benefits of VIS in empowering victims, offering them a sense of justice, and addressing challenges in their practical implementation. Through doctrinal research, the article proposes recommendations to enhance the use of VIS in India, aiming to create a more compassionate and just criminal justice system. The article is structured in five parts: the introduction, an exploration of VIS and comparative analysis, the benefits of VIS, challenges and opportunities for victim empowerment, and concluding recommendations. This proactive approach can significantly improve how victims are treated in India, making strides towards a more victim-centric justice system.
References
Law Commissions of India, 154th Report, (May 28, 2023),https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3ca0daec69b5adc880fb464895726dbdf/uploads/2022/08/2022080878-1.pdf.
Rattiram&Ors. v. State of M.P, AIR 2012 SC 148
MallikarjunKodagil (Dead) v. State of Karnataka (2018),
KrishnadasRajagopal, Victim of a crime should have a say in punishment: Supreme Court, The Hindu, (Oct. 14, 2018, at10: 06 pm), (June 01, 2023), https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/victim-of-a-crime-should-have-a-say-in-punishment-supreme-court/article25221532.ece.
Bhopal gas tragedy: Supreme Court rejects more money for victims, BBC News, (2014, March 14), (June 01, 2023) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-64899487.
The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2008, No. 5, Acts of Parliament,2009 (India).
Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, G.A. Res. 40/34, Art. 1. & Art. 2.
G.S. Bajpai, "A victory for crime victims," The Hindu, (May 11, 2022), (June 05, 2023), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331045772_Victim_Impact_Statement,
National Legal Services Authorsity-Statistical Information in respect of Legal Literacy/Legal Awareness Camps/Programme, (Apr., to Dec. 2022), (June 07, 2023), https://nalsa.gov.in/statistics/awareness-camps-programmes-report/awareness-camp-programme-april-2016-to-december-2022.
ParmanandKatara v. Union of India (1989), AIR 2039, 1989 SCR (3) 997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2630997a
The Criminal Procedure Code 1972,No. 2, Acts of Parliament, 1974. (India)
The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, No. 20, Act of Parliament, 1958 (India)
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,No. 59, Act of Parliament, 1988(India).
INDIA CONST, art., 14, 20, & 21.
Study Report: Law Commission of India, 152nd, Report on Custodial Crimes (1994), (June 11, 2023), http://www.bareactslive.com/LCR/LC152.HTM?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1.
Study Report: Law Commission of India, 154th, Report on the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, 1996, and 1963. The Law Commission took notice of the establishment of a Victim Assistance Fund in the state of Tamil Nadu,(Aug. 22, 1996), (June 16, 2023), https://criminallawreforms.in/reports/lci-reports/154th%20Report%20on%20The%20Code%20Criminal%20Procedure%201973%20Vol.%201.pdf.
Gudalure M.J. Cherian v. Union of India (1995) Supp3, SCC387.
State of Gujarat v. Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat (1998) 7 SCC 392.
S. Muralidhan, Rights of Victims in the Indian Criminal Justice System, National Human Rights Commission Journal, (2004, at. 04), (June 15, 2023), https://www.academia.edu/30124460/Rights_of_Victims_in_the_Indian_Criminal_Justice_System_Forthcoming_in_National_Human_Rights_Commission_Journal_2004_Table_of_Content.
ParmanandKatara V. Union Of India, AIR 2039, 1989 SCR (3) 997.
Robert C. Davis. & B.E. Smith., Victim impact statements and victim satisfaction: An unfulfilled promise? Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 2-3 (1994), (June 18, 2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(94)90044-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(94)90044-2
Study Report: Third Committeereport, Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, G.A. Res. 40/34, United Nations, (Nov. 29, 1985), (June 20, 2023), https://www.unodc.org/pdf/rddb/CCPCJ/1985/A-RES-40-34.pdf.
Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S 808, 808–10 (1991).
Georgia State University Law Review; Criminal Procedure Sentencing: Victim Impact Statement Volume. 1, Issue 2, Art., 20, GA. ST. U.L. REV. (May 15, 2012), (June 20, 2023), https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2562&context=gsulr.
Riley M.B., Victim Participation in the Criminal Justice System: In re Kenna and Victim Access to Presentence Reports, Utah L. REV, at. 236, (2007), (June 22, 2023),https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323494418_Muffled_Voices_Making_ways_for_Impact_Statements_in_Criminal_Justice_System_in_India .Sentencing, Victim impact statements-Canadian Victims Bill of Rights, (July 07, 2022), (June 25, 2023), https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/victims-victimes/sentencing-peine/vis-dv.html .
The Criminal Code of Canada, 1985, §722.2., Justice Laws Website, Criminal Code Version of section 722.2, Community impact statement from (July 23, 2015-to June 21, 2023) (June 25, 2023), https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-722.2-20150723.html.
Edna Erez, Victim Impact Statements, No.33, Australian Institute Of Criminology- Trends and Issue In Crime And Criminal Justice, ISSN 0817-8542 ISSN 0 642 166153, (Sep 1991) (June 28, 2023), https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/tandi033.pdf
Ministry Of Justice, Making a Victim Personal Statement: You have a voice in the criminal justice system and have a right to explain how the crime has affected you, (Apr. 21, 2021), (June 28, 2023), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/264625/victims-vps-guidance.pdf.
Sentencing Council, Victim personal statements, (June 30, 2023), https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/explanatory-material/magistrates-court/item/victims/1-victim-personal-statements/.
Miscellaneous provisions as to evidence, procedure, and trial, The Criminal Justice Act, 1967, Chapter 80, Section 9, (July 27, 1967), (2023), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/80/2015-05-26.
J Julian V. Roberts & Marie Manikis, Victim Personal Statements at Sentencing: A Review of the Empirical Research, Report for the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses in England and Wales, (October 2011), (June 29, 2023), https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/news/press-releases/victims-com/vps-research.pdf .
The Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill, No. X of 2020, Bill of RajyaSabha (Mar. 13, 2020).
Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab, 4SCC 719 (1979)(India)
Jagjeet Singh v. Ashish Mishra,Criminal Appeal No.632, Spl(Crl.) No. 2640 Of 2022.
AbhinavSekhri, Victims and Bail — The Judgment in Jagjeet Singh v. Ashish Mishra?, (May 15, 2020), (June 30, 2023), https://criminallawstudiesnluj.wordpress.com/2022/05/21/victims-and-bail-the-judgment-in-jagjeet-singh-v-ashish-mishra%ef%bf%bc%ef%bf%bc/ .
RekhaMurarkavs The State Of West Bengal, 2020, SLP (Crl.) No. 7848 of 2019.
G.S. Bajpai&AnkitKaushik, A victory for crime victims, in 'The Hindu’, (May 11, 2022), (July 02, 2023), https://profgsbajpai.in/wp content/uploads/2022/05/OPED-11-MAY-2022.pdf.
DipaDube, Muffled voices. Making way for impact statements in the criminal justice system in India, Vol. XII - N. 1 (Apr. 2018), (July 05, 2023), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323494418_Muffled_Voices_Making_ways_for_Impact_Statements_in_Criminal_Justice_System_in_India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14664/rcvs/812
Government of Canada, The Director of Military Prosecutions (DMP), The DMP is head of the Canadian Military Prosecution Service, (Aug. 28,2018), (July 08, 2023), https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/benefits-military/legal-services/mil-prosecutions.html.
Director Of Military Prosecutions Annual Report 2018-2019, DMP Policy Directive 003/00 Post-Charge Screening, Chapter Five: Report of the Auditor General of Canada in the Administration of Justice in the Canadian Armed Force (Sep. 20, 2019) (July 10, 2023), https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/reports-publications/military-law/director-military-prosecutions-annual-report-2018-19/chapter-five-report-auditor-general-canada-administration-justice-caf.html.
DMP Policy Directive, Trial and Sentence Resolution Discussions, DMP Policy Directive 008/00 Plea, (Dec. 15, 2017), (July 10, 2023), https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/policies-standards/legal-policies-directives/plea-trial-sentence.html.
Director Of Military Prosecutions Annual Report 2020-2021, Chapter Two: Military Justice and the Court Martial System, Message from the Director of Military Prosecutions, (Aug. 26, 2022), (July 12, 2023), https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/reports-publications/military-law/director-military-prosecutions-annual-report-2020-2021/message-dmp-20-21.html.
AmartyaSahastranshu Singh, Procedural Limitations of Victim Impact Statement in India: A Critical Analysis, Vol 5, issue 1, (Aug. 26, 2022), (July 14, 2023), https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/25166069221117186#:~:text=Therefore%2C%20in%20the%20Indian%20Criminal,defendants%20in%20an%20unfair%20way .
AnkushShivajiGaikwadvs State Of Maharashtra, S.L.P. (Crl.) No.6287 of 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Priya Sirohi, Dr. Namita Singh Malik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
