ROLE OF NICE CLASSIFICATION IN TRADEMARK REGISTRATION SYSTEM OF INDIA: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.2675Keywords:
Determination, Nice Agreement, Class Heading, Goods and Services, Trademark Registration SystemAbstract [English]
Technological innovations have exerted a far-reaching and transformative influence across nearly all domains of human existence, including the realm of economic activity. These shifts are permeating the sphere of intellectual property, notably reshaping the contours and parameters of trademark law, encompassing both the criteria for trademark eligibility and the scope of legal safeguards afforded to such marks. The Nice Agreement was adopted for the classification of goods and services for protection and registration of trademarks as per the dynamic needs of the market. This agreement provides a broader and more concise list of classifications of goods and services, which play an important role in the trademark registration system. This paper intends to examine the impact of Nice Agreement and classification of goods and services in registration of trademarks. How has the concept of classification of goods and services evolved and developed in trademark law, and what are the criteria for classification and determination of goods and services? How does the Nice Classification of Goods and Services relate to the trademark registration system, and what are the challenges encountered in implementing this provision? These questions would be answer with deep analysis of the Nice Agreement and Trademark Laws provisions. In conclusion section we have witnessed that Nice Classification is playing a pivotal role in trademark registration and the class of proposed trademarks are determined interpreted according to the nature of goods and a standard set up by rules and procedures.
References
Anu Tiwari, “Passing off and the Law on ‘Trade Dress’ Protection: Reflections on Colgate v Anchor”, 10 Journal of Intellectual Property Rights November 2005, pp 480-490.
Adam Luke Alexander, “The commercial functions of a trade mark, unconventional trade marks and modern technology” (2018). https://www.fieldsjournal.org.uk
Andre Pohlmann, “The Interpretation of the Nice Class Heading in the European Union, or the Art of one Hand Clapping” 105 The Trademark Reporters 805 (2015).
Curtis Krechevsky and Gailyc C. Sonia, “The Nice Agreement Revisited: Still a Class Act” 91 Trademark Reporters 1184(2001).
Elmer William Hanak, III, “The Quality Assurance Function of Trademarks”, 43 (2) Fordham L. Rev. 363 (1974).
George Mihai Irimescu, “The Nice Classification- Evolution and Interpretation” Challenges of Knowledge Society 738-747 (2021).
International Classification of Goods and Services for purposes of Registration of marks, Art. 1.
International Classification of Goods and Services for purposes of Registration of marks, WIPO Publication No. 500.2(E).
Jessie N. Roberts, International Trademark Classification: A Guide to the Nice Agreement 285 (Oxford University, New York, 4th edn, 2012).
Jessie N. Marshall, “Classification of Services under the International (Nice) Agreement” 82 Trademarks Reporter 94 (1992).
K C Kailasam, Ramu Vedaraman et.al. , Law of Trademarks including International Registration under Madrid Protocol & Geographical Indications 174 (LexisNexis, New Delhi, 4th edn. , 2017).
Nice Agreement Concerning the Classification of Goods and Services, 1957.
Nicholas S. Economides “The Economics of Trademarks”78 Trademark Reporter 523 (1988).
Richard Ashmead, “International Classification Class Headings: Illustrative or Exemplary? The Scope of European Union Registrations” 2 Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpl209
Timothy Rose, Convenient pigeon Holes? The Classification of Trademarks in Historical Perspective Vol. 8 (Bournemouth University, 2005).
Stefan Calimanu, “How technology is changing the landscape of economic development”, News & Media, May 24th, 2023.
World Intellectual Property Organizationhttp1s://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/classification/nice/ last visited on December 18, 2023.
The Trademark Act, 1999 (Act 47 of 1999), S.9
Southern v. How, 1616.
Chartered Institute of Patent Attorney v. Registrar of Trademark Case C-307/10 CJEU
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Manoj Kumar Manjhi, Dr. Sanjay Prakash Srivastava

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.