READING DOWN OF ART 370 AND 35A-2019 IN JAMMU AND KASHMIR: A CASE OF OFFENSIVE LAWFARE

Authors

  • Dr. Sonali Chitalkar Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Miranda House, Delhi University
  • Rahul Chimurkar Assistant Professor, Deshbandhu College, University of Delhi
  • Vimlok Tiwari Assistant Professor, Bharati College, University of Delhi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.2648

Keywords:

JKL, Aspirations, Diverse, Constitution, Policy, Partition, Region, Instrument of Accession

Abstract [English]

The State of JKL is populated by diverse populations and is composed of different regional identities. This has reflected in differing political aspirations in all three regions. This paper discusses how the different aspirations of three regions have been used in the Great game. It is established how Jammu has historically expressed an urge for autonomy from influences in Kashmir. It has also always been the voice for constitutional parity with the rest of the nation. Kashmir on the other hand has found a space for ethno-centric aspirations and these have been historically articulated by a closed political circle which has used these aspirations as tool for power.
The paper establishes how, the reading down of Article 370 and Art 35A was a classic case of offensive legal warfare (lawfare) to move against big power geopolitical games played through regional proxies like Pakistan.

References

Bhat, S. (2021). State formation in colonial India. [PDF file]. Retrieved August 5, 2021, from local file.

Shankar, V. (n.d.). My reminiscences of Sardar Patel. Retrieved from https://qdoc.tips/my-reminiscences-of-sardar-patel-vol1-by-vishnu-shankarpdf-pdf-free.html

Qureshi, M. N. (2017). The Khilafat movement in India, 1919-1924. School of Oriental and African Studies. ProQuest LLC. Retrieved from https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/28516/1/10672675.pdf

Kawale, D. A. (2024). Abrogation of Article 370: A detailed analysis. International Journal of Legal and Social Issues, 6(1), 132-146. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLSI.111752

Kashmir Connected. (2016, February 2). Sheikh Abdullah: 'Independence ... may be the only solution'. Retrieved from https://www.kashmirconnected.com/resources/category/scotsman

Bhandari, M. C. (2006). Solving Kashmir. New Delhi, India: Lancer Publishers & Distributors. (p. 170).

Chowdhary, R. (2019). Jammu and Kashmir: 1990 and beyond: Competitive politics in the shadow of separatism. SAGE Publications India.

Nadaf, A. H. (2021). Discursive representation of the Article 370 abrogation: A comparative CDA of the headlines of two major Indian online news publications. Journalism, 24(6), 1342–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211056843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211056843

Noorani, A. G. (2011). Article 370: A constitutional history of Jammu and Kashmir. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB08083873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198074083.001.0001

Nair, B. G. (2019). Abrogation of Article 370: Can the president act without the recommendation of the constituent assembly? Indian Law Review, 3(3), 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2019.1700592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2019.1700592

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Chitalkar, S., Chimurkar, R., & Tiwari, V. (2024). READING DOWN OF ART 370 AND 35A-2019 IN JAMMU AND KASHMIR: A CASE OF OFFENSIVE LAWFARE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 2472–2476. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.2648