SHAKESPEARE’S TROILUS THROUGH FEMINISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.2524Keywords:
Shakespeare, Troilus, Cressida, Feminine, Masculine, Parasitism, SeparatismAbstract [English]
The present paper attempts to examine the character of Shakespeare’s Troilus from Troilus and Cressida in the light of feminism. Though a number of studies have been conducted on the play with special focus on the character of Troilus but finding them lacking in the feminist perspective either entirely or not sufficiently enough this study undertakes to establish Troilus as a weak, emotional and feminine male.
References
Shakespeare, William. Troilus and Cressida. Edited by Kenneth Muir, Oxford University Press, 1984.
Bethell, S.L. “Troilus and Cressida.” Shakespeare: Modern Essays in Criticism, edited by Leonard F. Dean, Oxford University Press, 1961, p. 261.
Bielmeier, Michael G. "Ethics and Anxiety in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida." Christianity and Literature, vol. 50, no. 2, Winter 2001, pp. 225-245. The Johns Hopkins University Press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/44312826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014833310105000204
Dunkel, Wilbur D. "Shakespeare's Troilus." Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, Oct. 1951, pp. 331-334. Oxford University Press, www.jstor.org/stable/2866252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2866252
Hazlitt, William. “Troilus and Cressida.” The Round Table - Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays, J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd., 1960.
Lynch, Stephen J. "The Idealism of Shakespeare's Troilus." South Atlantic Review, vol. 51, no. 1, Jan. 1986, pp. 19-29. South Atlantic Modern Language Association, www.jstor.org/stable/3199552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3199552
Maguire, Laurie E. "Performing Anger: The Anatomy of Abuse(s) in Troilus and Cressida." Renaissance Drama, new series, vol. 31, Performing Affect, 2002, pp. 153-183. The University of Chicago Press for Northwestern University. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41917369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/rd.31.41917369
Meyers, Diana Tietjens. “Some Reflections on Separatism and Power.” Feminist Social Thought: A Reader, Routledge, 1997.
Oates, J. C. "The Ambiguity of Troilus and Cressida." Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 2, Spring 1966, pp. 141-150. Oxford University Press, www.jstor.org/stable/2868238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2868238
Rollins, Hyder E. “The Troilus-Cressida Story from Chaucer to Shakespeare.” PMLA, vol. 32, no. 3, 1917, pp. 383-429. Modern Language Association, https://www.jstor.org/stable/457022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/457022
Roy, Emil. "War and Manliness in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida." Comparative Drama, vol. 7, no. 2, Summer 1973, pp. 107–120. Comparative Drama, www.jstor.org/stable/41152606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.1973.0007
Ruthven, K.K. “The Gendering of Critical Discourse.” Feminist Literary Studies: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Snider, D. J. "Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida." The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 1876, pp. 395-416. Penn State University Press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25665995.
Spear, Gary. "Shakespeare's 'Manly' Parts: Masculinity and Effeminacy in Troilus and Cressida." Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, Winter 1993, pp. 409-422. Oxford University Press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2870998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2870998
Taylor, George C. "Shakespeare's Attitude Towards Love and Honor in Troilus and Cressida." PMLA, vol. 45, no. 3, Sept. 1930, pp. 781-786. Modern Language Association, https://www.jstor.org/stable/457908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/457908
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yogesh Kumar Dubey

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























