SHAKESPEARE’S TROILUS THROUGH FEMINISM

Authors

  • Yogesh Kumar Dubey Associate Professor, Department of English, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.2524

Keywords:

Shakespeare, Troilus, Cressida, Feminine, Masculine, Parasitism, Separatism

Abstract [English]

The present paper attempts to examine the character of Shakespeare’s Troilus from Troilus and Cressida in the light of feminism. Though a number of studies have been conducted on the play with special focus on the character of Troilus but finding them lacking in the feminist perspective either entirely or not sufficiently enough this study undertakes to establish Troilus as a weak, emotional and feminine male.

References

Shakespeare, William. Troilus and Cressida. Edited by Kenneth Muir, Oxford University Press, 1984.

Bethell, S.L. “Troilus and Cressida.” Shakespeare: Modern Essays in Criticism, edited by Leonard F. Dean, Oxford University Press, 1961, p. 261.

Bielmeier, Michael G. "Ethics and Anxiety in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida." Christianity and Literature, vol. 50, no. 2, Winter 2001, pp. 225-245. The Johns Hopkins University Press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/44312826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014833310105000204

Dunkel, Wilbur D. "Shakespeare's Troilus." Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, Oct. 1951, pp. 331-334. Oxford University Press, www.jstor.org/stable/2866252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2866252

Hazlitt, William. “Troilus and Cressida.” The Round Table - Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays, J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd., 1960.

Lynch, Stephen J. "The Idealism of Shakespeare's Troilus." South Atlantic Review, vol. 51, no. 1, Jan. 1986, pp. 19-29. South Atlantic Modern Language Association, www.jstor.org/stable/3199552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3199552

Maguire, Laurie E. "Performing Anger: The Anatomy of Abuse(s) in Troilus and Cressida." Renaissance Drama, new series, vol. 31, Performing Affect, 2002, pp. 153-183. The University of Chicago Press for Northwestern University. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41917369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/rd.31.41917369

Meyers, Diana Tietjens. “Some Reflections on Separatism and Power.” Feminist Social Thought: A Reader, Routledge, 1997.

Oates, J. C. "The Ambiguity of Troilus and Cressida." Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 2, Spring 1966, pp. 141-150. Oxford University Press, www.jstor.org/stable/2868238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2868238

Rollins, Hyder E. “The Troilus-Cressida Story from Chaucer to Shakespeare.” PMLA, vol. 32, no. 3, 1917, pp. 383-429. Modern Language Association, https://www.jstor.org/stable/457022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/457022

Roy, Emil. "War and Manliness in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida." Comparative Drama, vol. 7, no. 2, Summer 1973, pp. 107–120. Comparative Drama, www.jstor.org/stable/41152606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.1973.0007

Ruthven, K.K. “The Gendering of Critical Discourse.” Feminist Literary Studies: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Snider, D. J. "Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida." The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 1876, pp. 395-416. Penn State University Press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25665995.

Spear, Gary. "Shakespeare's 'Manly' Parts: Masculinity and Effeminacy in Troilus and Cressida." Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, Winter 1993, pp. 409-422. Oxford University Press, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2870998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2870998

Taylor, George C. "Shakespeare's Attitude Towards Love and Honor in Troilus and Cressida." PMLA, vol. 45, no. 3, Sept. 1930, pp. 781-786. Modern Language Association, https://www.jstor.org/stable/457908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/457908

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Dubey, Y. K. (2023). SHAKESPEARE’S TROILUS THROUGH FEMINISM. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(2), 1450–1454. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.2524