ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: A MODERN ART OF ADJUDICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.2310Keywords:
Online Dispute Resolution, ADR, Process, ResolutionAbstract [English]
Online dispute resolution is basically a technique where disputes of the physical world and disputes of cyberspace can be solved in a better way, whether the dispute resolution procedure is completely online or partly online. But here the first question is; what are the areas where online dispute resolution processes may be helpful to solve disputes? And the second question is whether it is suitable to a particular environment? Basically, it is mooted by various jurists that e-commerce is the suitable place where online dispute resolution can help to provide justice to the community. But this is not a complete statement and the importance of online dispute resolution processes is much more than this fact. Number of other areas have been identified by various writers and practice in different countries shows the use of ODR in different fields. Online dispute resolution, similarly as ADR, is a range of processes and forms. ODR emphasized on how to do, rather than what to do? In future, most dispute resolution processes will likely migrate to online processes, and ODR will be useful to almost every type of dispute.
References
Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler and Thomas Schultz, Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice18 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2004).
These software tools records parameters of settlements according to wishes of parties and gives different option to parties to settle differences.
A. Bevan, Alternative Dispute Resolution 23 (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1992).
Rafal Morek, “Regulation of Online Dispute Resolution: Between Law and Technology” 58 (August 2005). (Unpublished Thesis), available at: http://www.odr. info/ cyber week/Regulation%20of%20ODR_Rafal%20Morek.doc (last visited on December 12, 2013
R. P. Alford, “The Virtual World and the Arbitration World” 18:4 J. Int’l. Arb. 449-461, (2001). DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/358382
Thomas Schultz, Gabrielle Kaufmann Kohler, et.al., "Online Dispute Resolution: The State of Art and Issues" 4 (E-com Research Project, the University of Geneva, Geneva, 2001), available at: http://www.online-adr.org (last visited on November 14, 2014).
M. Conley Tyler and J. Bornstein, “Accreditation of Online Dispute Resolution Practitioners” 25:3
C.R.Q. (2005).
Ethan Katsh, Janet Rifkin and Alan Gaitenby, “E-Commerce, E-Disputes, and E-Dispute Resolution: In the Shadow of eBay Law" 15:3 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 705-734, 733 (2000). Available at: http://odrindia.in/ (last visited on December 15, 2017).
A. Bevan, Alternative Dispute Resolution 23 (Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1992).
Julia Hörnle, "Cross-border Internet Dispute Resolution" 79 (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2009). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576102
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suraj Kumar Maurya, Dr. Ashutosh Mishra, Dr. Madhuri Kharat, Dr. Ajay Sonawane, Shruti Shukla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
