WE ALL BECOME THE OFFERING: RATAN THIYAM’S CHAKRAVYUHA AND CONTEMPORARY MANIPUR

Kshetrimayum Premchandra

doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.2266

Authors

Kshetrimayum Premchandra Assistant Professor, Department of English, Tripura University, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.2266

Keywords:

Ratan Thiyam, Theatre, Violence, Politics, Manipur

Abstract [English]

This paper delves into the subtext of the chakravyuha episode in the Mahabharata and examines how Ratan Thiyam transforms it into a play that mirrors the socio-political landscape of Manipur across time. Thiyam’s Chakravyuha undeniably offers a political commentary on Manipur, metaphorically portraying the struggles faced by Manipuri youths, akin to the fate of the helpless Abhimanyu. He illustrates how these young individuals are ensnared by powerful forces, forced into violence not as conquerors or victims, but as sacrificial pawns. In this light, the play serves as a poignant reflection on the entrapment of youth in cycles of conflict, providing a powerful critique of contemporary realities which have become notorious in recent times. The depiction of violence on the Manipuri stage is not a recent phenomenon. Political dramas have long captivated Manipuri audiences, resonating deeply with their experiences. This paper examines the factors that made this politically charged play significant in the 1980s, and why it remains even more relevant today. Furthermore, it delves into the interconnected themes of violence, human suffering, sectarianism, ethnic divisions, and other critical issues that are pivotal in shaping Manipur's future.

References

Bandyopadhyay, Samik (June/Sept, 1997). "The New Karnas of Manipur." Seagull Theatre Quarterly. Issue 14/15.

Dattani, Mahesh (2009). “Contemporary Indian Theatre and its Relevance.” Modern Indian Theatre: A Reader, edited by Nandi Bhatia, Oxford.

Dharwedker, Aparna Bhargava (2005). Theatres of Independence: Drama, Theory, and Urban Performance in India since 1947. University of Iowa Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book6841

Fukuyama, Francis (2012). The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. Profile Books Ltd.

Geertz, Clifford. NEGARA (1980): The Theatre State in the Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400843381

Kirby, Michael Issue (June, 1975). “On Political Theatre.” The Drama Review, Jun., 1975, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 129-13. Published by: The MIT. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1144954. Accessed on 12 May 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1144954

Nagpal, Kavita (1998). Ratan Thiyam: Chakravyuha. Seagull Books.

Pannikar, K. N (2017). “Mahabharata reflected in Performance.” The Mahabharata Revisited, edited by R. N. Dandhekar, Sahitya Akademi.

Premchandra, Kshetrimayum (2024). Adrift: An Anthology of Post-independence Manipuri Poetry. Sahitya Akademi.

Said, Edward (1994). Culture and Imperialism. Vintage.

Schechner, Richard (2013). Performance Studies, An Introduction. 3rd ed., Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203715345

Sen, Geeti and Nagpal, Kavita. “Ratan Thiyam in Dialogue with Kavita Nagpal and Geeti Sen.” Where the Sun Rises when Shadows Fall: The North-East, edited by Geeti Sen, Oxford UP, 2006.

Singh, Ningthoukhongjam Khelchandra (2011). Ariba Manipuri Sahityagi Itihas. Self.

Thiyam, Ratan (2016). Manipur Trilogy. Translated by, Tayenjam Bijoykumar Singh. Wordsmith Publishers.

Toijamba, Rajen (2007). Manipur Dramada Realism. Writer’s Forum Imphal.

White, John J (2004). Bertolt Brecht’s Dramatic Theory. Camden House. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781571136350

Zook, Darren C (Autumn, 2001). “The Farcical Mosaic: The Changing Masks of Political Theatre in Contemporary India.” Asian Theatre Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 174-199. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1124151. Accessed on 26 May 2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2001.0024