THE CONFLUENCE OF GENDER IDENTITIES AND CULTURAL HERITAGE: INVESTIGATING THE INFLUENCE ON HEALTH BEHAVIOURS AND SOCIAL DETERMINANT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.1997Keywords:
Gender Identities, Cultural Legacy, Health Practices, Societal Influences, Intersectional Analysis, Health Inequities, Public Health InitiativesAbstract [English]
Traditional gender roles dictate that men engage in physically demanding activities while women are often relegated to domestic tasks, a dynamic that profoundly impacts health behaviours and outcomes in many cultures. This paper delves into the intricate confluence of gender identities and cultural heritage, scrutinizing their collective influence on health behaviours and social determinants. It posits that both gender norms and cultural expectations are pivotal in shaping individual lifestyle choices, risk behaviours, and overall health outcomes. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, this study elucidates how intersecting identities create a complex web of influences that either exacerbate or mitigate health disparities. By analysing diverse cultural contexts, the paper highlights how specific cultural practices and gender roles interplay to affect physical activity, dietary habits, mental health, and substance use. The findings underscore the necessity for culturally sensitive public health strategies that acknowledge and address these multifaceted interactions. Moreover, the study advocates for a nuanced understanding of intersectionality to inform policy interventions aimed at reducing health inequities. This research contributes to the broader discourse on health equity, offering insights that are crucial for developing inclusive health.
References
Beauvoir, S. (1949). The second sex. Vintage Books.
Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Park, E. R. (2005). Cultural competence and health care disparities: Key perspectives and trends. Health Affairs, 24(2), 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.499
Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality— an important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267-1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Carrillo, J. E., Carrillo, V. A., Perez, H. R., Salas-Lopez, D., Natale-Pereira, A., & Byron,
A. T. (2011). Defining and targeting health care access barriers. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 22(2), 562-575. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2011.0037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2011.0037
Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139-167.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Crenshaw, K. (2016). The urgency of intersectionality. TEDWomen. https://www.ted.com/talks/kimberle_crenshaw_the_urgency_of_intersectionality
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. NYU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780195301731.013.51089
Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. W. W. Norton & Company.
Hall, S. (1996). Cultural studies and its theoretical legacies. In D. Morley & K. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 262-275). Routledge.
hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. South End Press.
King, M., Smith, A., & Gracey, M. (2009). Indigenous health part 2: The underlying causes of the health gap. The Lancet, 374(9683), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(09)60827-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60827-8
Kreps, G. L. (2008). Strategic use of communication to market cancer prevention and control to vulnerable populations. Health Marketing Quarterly, 25(1-2), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07359680802126217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07359680802126327
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674- 697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Parrott, R., & Kreuter, M. W. (2008). Multiculturalism and health communication: Linking culture and health communication. Health Communication, 23(4), 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230802229787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc174
Paul, B. D. (1963). Health, culture, and community: Case studies of public reactions to health programs. Russell Sage Foundation.
Rosenthal, E. L., Wiggins, N., Ingram, M., Mayfield-Johnson, S., & De Zapien, J. G. (2010). Community health workers then and now: An overview of national studies aimed at defining the field. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 34(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181e52b5c DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0b013e31821c64d7
Schulz, A. J., & Mullings, L. (Eds.). (2006). Gender, race, class, and health: Intersectional approaches. Jossey-Bass.
Tai, D. B. G., Shah, A., Doubeni, C. A., Sia, I. G., & Wieland, M. L. (2021). The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on racial and ethnic minorities in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(4), 703-706. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa815
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Visnudharshana R, Henry Kishore S

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.












