UNRAVELLING THE COMPLEXITIES OF THE INDIA-CHINA BORDER CONFLICT: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.1853Keywords:
India-China Border, Territorial Dispute, McMahon Line, Aksai Chin, GeopoliticsAbstract [English]
The India-China border conflict is a longstanding and very complicated territorial dispute with significant historical, cultural, and strategic dimensions. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis by delving into the historical events and factors that have contributed to the emergence and persistence of the conflict. It investigates the competing territorial claims over Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh, highlighting the legal, historical, and geopolitical arguments presented by both the countries. The study evaluates the strategic implication of the conflict in contemporary geopolitics, including its impact on regional stability, alliances, and great power dynamics. It also analyses the patterns and mechanisms of escalation and de-escalation observed in the conflict, including military manoeuvres, diplomatic exchanges, and crisis management efforts. Finally, the paper explores potential pathways for resolving the tensions through diplomatic negotiations, confidence-building measures, and regional cooperation initiatives. Understanding these issues allows the paper to provide meaningful policy recommendations to lessen tensions and promote peace and stability in the region. The study shows that the roots of the conflict trace back to early 20th-century British and Russian expansions in Central Asia, with the McMahon Line and Aksai Chin remaining significant flashpoints. The strategic implications extend beyond the bilateral relationship, affecting regional and global power dynamics. Through a detailed understanding of the conflict, this research aspires to identify viable solutions for one of Asia’s most enduring territorial disputes. The steps to resolve the conflict should include bilateral negotiations, regional cooperation, and international involvement for long term bilateral, regional and international peace and stability respectively.
References
Bajpai, K., Ho, S., & Miller, M. C. (Eds.). (2020). Routledge handbook of China–India relations (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351001564-1
Brecher, M. (1979). Non-alignment under stress: The West and the India-China border war. Pacific Affairs, 52(4), 612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2757064
Brewster, D. (2011). India as an Asia Pacific power (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203637685
Chacko, P. (Ed.). (2016). New regional geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific: Drivers, dynamics and consequences (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315677392-1
Elkin, J. F., & Fredericks, B. (1983). Sino-Indian border talks: The view from New Delhi. Asian Survey, 23(10), 1128-1139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2644204
Guha, R. (2011). An Asian clash of civilisations? Revisiting the Sino-Indian conflict of 1962. Economic and Political Weekly.
Nadkarni, V. (2010). Strategic partnerships in Asia: Balancing without alliances (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203865019
Raju, K. D. (2020). Doklam and beyond: Revisiting the India-China territorial disputes: An international law perspective. India Review, 19(1), 85-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2019.1710081
Rajesh. (2018). Why India and China’s border disputes are so difficult to resolve. International Journal of Research, 5(5), 3173-3181.
Scott, D. (2008). The great power ‘great game’ between India and China: ‘The logic of geography’. Geopolitics, 13(1), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040701783243
Shelvankar, K. (1962). China's Himalayan frontiers. International Affairs, 38(4), 472-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2609571
Singh, B., Khan, A., Thoker, P. A., & Lone, M. A. (2022). New great game in the Indo-Pacific: Rediscovering India’s pragmatism and paradoxes (1st ed.). Routledge India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003030119-1
Thomas, R. G. C. (1981). Security relationships in Southern Asia: Differences in the Indian and American perspectives. Asian Survey, 21(7), 698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.1981.21.7.01p0288a
Toppo, R., & Aslany, M. (2014). Sino-Indian border dispute: The impossible settlement, and need for a new framework. SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2478916
Tripathi, D. (Ed.). (2020). Re-imagining border studies in South Asia (1st ed.). Routledge India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429321467
Vertzberger, Y. (1996). [Review of the book The Sino-Indian border dispute and Sino-Indian relations, by X. Liu]. The Journal of Asian Studies, 55(1), 135-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2943649
Weimar, N. D. (2013). Sino-Indian power preponderance in maritime Asia: A (re-)source of conflict in the Indian Ocean and South China Sea. Global Change, Peace & Security, 25(1), 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2013.761192
Xie, L., & Jia, S. (2017). Diplomatic water cooperation: The case of Sino-India dispute over Brahmaputra. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(5), 677-694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9339-4
Yelery, A., & Nile, M. (Eds.). (2021). Tailspin: The politics of India-China economic relations (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003231660
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zahid Yousuf Khan, Shabir Ahmad Bhat, Ishfaq Ahmad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.