BEYOND ROTE LEARNING: USING CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TO ENHANCE GRAMMAR COMPREHENSION AND APPLICATION IN ENGLISH WRITING

Authors

  • Dr. Aliya Tazeen Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Aligarh Muslim University Centre, Murshidabad, India
  • Dr. Noora Abdul Kader Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Aligarh Muslim University Centre, Murshidabad, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.1664

Keywords:

Constructivist Approach, National Education Policy (2020), English Grammar, Tenses, Secondary School Students

Abstract [English]

The shift from conventional teaching methods to learner-centric approaches reflects the changing landscape of education towards more individualised and engaging learning experiences. Constructivism is a creative approach that is one of the best methods for improving English language proficiency. It is a well-known learner-centric method emphasising active participation, inquiry, and knowledge-building in interactive, discussion-based learning settings. The National Education Policy (2020) also supports a pedagogical framework that focuses on the student and encourages experiential learning, holistic growth, inquiry-based investigation, and adaptable teaching methodologies. This study examines the efficacy of authentic teaching practices rooted in the constructivist approach to teaching grammar in secondary schools. This study supports the NEP's goal of using constructivist, learner-centric techniques to transform education. The research design employed is quasi-experimental. Data is gathered from two intact classes of the ninth grade, comprising around 80 students from Aligarh Muslim University. The control and experimental groups consist of 40 participants each, ensuring equal sample sizes in both groups. The sample is chosen using the convenient sampling method, and the data is analysed using suitable statistical techniques such as t-tests and ANCOVA. The study results will be used to modify and reorganise instructional strategies so students acquire grammatical structures more successfully.

References

Chand, S. P. (2023). Constructivism in Education : Exploring the Contributions of Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(7), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23630021800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23630021800

Connor, K. A. O., Greene, H. . C., & Anderson, P. J. (2006). Action research: A tool for improving teacher quality and classroom practice.

Kaufman, D. (2004). Constructivist Issues in Language Learning and Teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190504000121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000121

Kim, J. S. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024963

Kumar Shah, R. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600

Majumder, M. B. (2024). Constructivist Approach in NEP 2020: Educational Reforms in India. Vidyawarta, 2022, 62–67.

Muna Aljohani. (2017). Principles of “Constructivism” in Foreign Language Teaching. Journal of Literature and Art Studies, 7(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2017.01.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2017.01.013

National Curriculum Framework. (2005). National curriculum framework.

National Education Policy. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. In Government of India. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003254942-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003254942-12

Pandya, K. V. (2015). Individual Differences and Use of Constructivist Approach through Technology. International Journal for Research in Education (IJRE), 4, 41–46.

Suhendi, A., & Purwarno. (2018). Constructivist Learning Theory: The Contribution to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. AICLL The 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature, 4, 87. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1921

Sulistyowati, T. (2019). Bottom-up and top-down listening process within cognitive constructivist learning theory. PROMINENT, 2(1), 92–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/pro.v2i1.2962

Szabó, F., & Csépes, I. (2022). Constructivism in language pedagogy. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 13(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2022.00136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2022.00136

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Tazeen, A., & Kader, N. A. (2024). BEYOND ROTE LEARNING: USING CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TO ENHANCE GRAMMAR COMPREHENSION AND APPLICATION IN ENGLISH WRITING. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.1664