DECODING BUDDHIST IMAGERY: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL REPRESENTATION IN 'PAPILIO BUDDHA' AND 'MADRAS'

Authors

  • Sumithra S. PhD Research Scholar, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Subramani R. Associate Professor, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Periyar University, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.1646

Keywords:

Dalitism, Buddhism, Feminism, Dalit Feminism, Madras, Papilio Buddha, Cinema

Abstract [English]

Buddhism, a religion and philosophy founded by Gautama Siddhartha, (Buddha) around 2,500 years ago, has been utilized as a counter-hegemonic force to challenge dominant socio-political structures in India. By embracing Buddhism, individuals and communities can resist and subvert the oppressive structures and ideologies that have been used to marginalize and exclude them. This research analyzes how the films "Papilio Buddha" (2013) and "Madras" (2014), deploy Buddhist themes and motifs to critique socio-political issues, particularly Dalit struggle, resistance against caste oppression and Rights. The objectives of this research are to investigate how Buddhist symbols and imagery address social and political issues and to explore the significance of Buddhism in forming political identities and promoting collective resistance. Furthermore, this research examines the political symbolism of Buddhism in the films "Papilio Buddha" and "Madras", Through the insights of B.R. Ambedkar who argued that Buddhism has emerged as a counter–hegemonic force to the oppressive Brahmanical system, perpetuating inequality and social injustice by applying Saussurean semiotics and structuralism theory to interpret the deliberate application of Buddhist symbolism in these stories, highlighting the power of film as a medium for political discourse.

References

Ambedkar, B. R. (1957). The Buddha and his Dhamma. Siddharth Publications.

Gombrich, R. F. (2006). Theravada Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to modern Colombo. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203130254

Keown, D. (2013). Buddhism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199663835.001.0001

Kumar, R. (2018). Buddhism and Politics in Modern India. Journal of Contemporary Buddhism, 19(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2018.1450966

Madras (2014). Pa.Ranjith. Studio Green Productions

NaradaThera. (1964). The Buddha and his Teachings. Buddhist Publication Society.

Paplio Buddha (2013). Jayan K Cherian. Silicon Media&Kayal Films

Rajan, R. (2020). The political aspects of Buddhism in India. Journal of Buddhist Studies, 42(1), 1-10.

Sangharakshita. (2016). Dr.Ambedkar and Buddhism. Windhorse Publications.

Sharma, R. (2019). Buddhism and Politics. Journal of Religion and Politics, 20(2), 123-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2019.1568374

Singh, S. (2017). Ashoka: The Great Emperor. Penguin Books.

Tambiah, S. J. (1992). Buddhism and the Spirit Cults in North-East Thailand. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

S., S., & R., S. (2024). DECODING BUDDHIST IMAGERY: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL REPRESENTATION IN ’PAPILIO BUDDHA’ AND ’MADRAS’. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.1646