THE MODALITY OF PROPPIAN “FALSE HERO”: NEITHER A HERO NOR A VILLAIN IN (FOLK) NARRATIVES AND REAL LIFE

Authors

  • Ramakrishnan M. Assistant Professor of Folklore, Department of Tribal Studies, Central University of Jharkhand, Cheri-Manatu, Ranchi – 835222, Jharkhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.150

Keywords:

Narratemes, Morphology, Actants, Modality, Aspectuality, Actantiality

Abstract [English]

Being the contemporary of Roland Barthes and also prominent scholar in French Semiotics, and also known for founding the Parisian School of Semiotics, Algirdas Julien Greimas, with his formal trainings in structural linguistics shaped the theory of signification by adding plastic semiotics. Indeed, his masterly contributions that had given a new direction in the study of narratives include the famous semiotics square, actantial model, concepts of isotopy, narrative programme and the semiotics of the natural world. However, the actantial model developed by Greimas in 1966 provided an analytical tool for studying various actions carried out by different actors (“actants”) in a real or fictional story. Although developed from the suggestion given by Vladimir Propp that his [Propp’s] seven dramatis personae such as ‘villain’, ‘donor’, ‘helper’, ‘princess/sought-for-person’, ‘dispatcher’, ‘hero’, and ‘false hero’ could be reduced further, Greimas proposed the actantial narrative schema with six actants that manifest their movements of relationship along the line founded on knowledge and power. However, the ‘false hero’ as one of the dramatis personae could be seen as important as, and as similar to, others in the narrative structure, its modality is quite interesting, and it tends to warrant an academic discussion to contemplate its morphology. Taking few examples from folktales and drawing insights from the Greimasian actantial model, this study presents the semiotic account of the ‘false hero’ to highlight the fact that the ‘false hero’ occupies a significant place not only within the real and fictional stories but also in daily life, by explaining the veridictory modality structure of truth and falseness. By drawing examples from folktales, this article comprehends the nature of the ‘false hero’, who is neither a hero nor a villain, for providing a grammatical framework that facilitates our smooth handling of the notion that is indispensably occupying our everyday life. Therefore, the significance of this paper is that it is lessening our efforts to decipher the nature of different characters in different forms of narratives and their presentations in different media.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashliman, D. L. (2002). The Goose-Girl. University of Pittsburgh.

Ashliman, D. L. (2020). Grimm Brother's Children's and Household Tales (Grimms' Fairy Tales)". University of Pittsburgh.

Dogra, S. (2017). The Thirty-One Functions in Vladimir Propp’s Morphology of the Folktale : An Outline and Recent Trends in the Applicability of the Proppian Taxonomic Model. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 9(2), 410-419. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v9n2.41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v9n2.41

Dundes, A. (1964). The Morphology of North American Indian Folktales. Helsinki : Folklore Fellows Communications, 81(195).

Dundes, A. (1968). Excerpts from : Vladímir Propp Morphology of the Folk Tale 1928. Tr. The American Folklore Society and Indiana University.

Greimas, A. J., and Fontanille, J. (1993). The Semiotics of Passions : From States of Affairs to States of Feeling. Minneapolis and London : University of Minnesota Press.

Greimas, A.J. (1987). On Anger : A Lexical Semantic Study, in on Meaning : Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. London : Frances Printer.

Greimas, A.J. (1987). On Meaning : Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory (Open linguistics series). London : Frances Printer.

Greimas, A.J. and Courtés, J. (1982). Semiotic and Language : An Analytical Dictionary. L. Crist, et al. Tr. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.

Greimas, A.J. (1966). Structural Semantics : An Attempt at a Method. London : University of Nebraska Press.

Herman, D. (2000). Existentialist Roots of Narrative Actants. Studies in 20th Century Literature,24(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.1484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.1484

Hébert, L. (2019). "The Veridictory Square" in An Introduction to Applied Semiotics : Tools for Text and Image Analysis, 29-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429329807

Myers, S. (2014, April 24). Vladimir Propp’s “31 Narratemes” : Another approach to story structure. Go Into the Story.

Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the Folktale. Trans. Laurence Scott, revised Louis A. Wagner. Austin : University of Texas Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/783911

Ramakrishnan, M. (1997). Semiotic and Cognitive Study of Folk Narratives of Southern Tamil Nadu (Unpublished dissertation). New Delhi : Jawaharlal Nehru University.

Ramakrishnan, M. (2002). Conceptualization and Configuration of Body, Emotion and Knowledge in Narrative Discourses with Special Reference to Tamil Ballads. (Unpublished dissertation) New Delhi : Jawaharlal Nehru University. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/29134.

Sydow, C. W. (1948). Selected Papers on Folklore. Copenhagen : Rosenkilde and Bagger.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-26

How to Cite

M., R. (2022). THE MODALITY OF PROPPIAN “FALSE HERO”: NEITHER A HERO NOR A VILLAIN IN (FOLK) NARRATIVES AND REAL LIFE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 3(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.150