GLOBALIZATION AND METAL REPOUSSÉ CRAFT OF VARANASI: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Authors

  • Sachin Pathak Research Scholar, Department of Design, Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan, India & Assistant Professor, Department of Foundation, Pearl Academy, Delhi (West), India
  • Dushyant Dave Associate Professor, Department of Design, Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.1460

Keywords:

Globalization, Metal Repoussé, Varanasi, Traditional Craftsmanship, Cultural Heritage, Challenges, Opportunities

Abstract [English]

Varanasi, on the Ganges River in India, is recognized for its old crafts and culture. Metal repoussé is one of several art forms that reference millennia-old aesthetics and methods. Varanasi metal repoussé had problems and possibilities with globalisation. This abstract explores Varanasi's metal repoussé craft's complex relationship with globalisation, its problems, and potential for sustainable expansion. Globalisation has benefited and hurt Varanasi crafts like metal repoussé. Artists may present their work abroad with greater connection and market access, boosting economic and cultural interchange. Globalisation causes loss of authenticity, mass-produced replacements, and artisan exploitation for profit. Metal repoussé artists in Varanasi battle to preserve their skills and creations despite progress. Globalisation might destroy ancient traditions. Customers want quicker, cheaper goods; therefore, craftspeople must decrease their quality and authenticity requirements to compete. Globalisation has commercialized craft, turning it into commodities. Commercialization devalues each piece's work, ability, and cultural relevance, exploiting artists who are already suffering. Despite these constraints, globalisation may reinvigorate Varanasi's metal repoussé craft. One solution is using digital networks and technology to reach more people while retaining creative expression. Handicrafts are respected more because internet markets and social media allow craftspeople to exhibit their work, engage with buyers, and share their story. Collaborations with cultural organisations, historians, and designers may modernize and experiment with methods. Craftspeople may attract more customers and stay up with the market by incorporating new ideas and design features while keeping their trade. Varanasi craftsmen may benefit on the rising demand for environmentally and ethically manufactured goods by presenting their products as cultural heritage and sustainability. Craftspeople may attract socially conscious clients by emphasising local resources, eco-friendly processes, and fair trade. In today's globalized world, the Varanasi metal repoussé craft has many obstacles but also many potentials for development and creativity. Collaboration, technology, and historical preservation help craftspeople participate in the global market.

References

United Nations Development Programme. (1990). Human development report. Oxford University Press.

Vijayagopalan, S. (1993). Economic status of handicraft artisans. National Council of Applied Economic Research.

Ministry of Textiles, Government of India. (n.d.). Annual reports. New Delhi.

Das, S. R. (2006, March 18). Cultural life and economic growth. The Economic Times.

Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts. (2006-2007). Annual report. New Delhi.

Saraf, N. (1991). In the journey of craft development, 1941-1991. Sampark Publication Division.

Sood, A. (2007, May). Crafts as sustainable livelihood option in rural India. Retrieved from www.craftsrevival.org

Chatterjee, A. (2005, April). Crafts in transition. Retrieved from www.craftsrevival.org

Mohapatra, R. C. (2005, December). Changing patterns in the applique crafts of Pipili. Orissa Review, 62(5), 66.

Mohapatra, R. C. (2005, December). Changing patterns in the applique crafts of Pipili. Orissa Review, 62(5), 67.

Basu, S. (2005, August 14). The carpet makers. The Hindu.

Scrase, T. J. (2003). Precarious production: Globalization and artisan labour in the Third World. Third World Quarterly, 24(3), 449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659032000084401

The Samaja. (2006, September 12). Rajyara Kshyudrasilpa Pain Chin Aatank [in Oriya].

Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. Penguin.

Santhanam, K. (2006, November 12). Different strokes. The Hindu.

Ghouse, S. M. (2012). Indian handicraft industry: Problems and strategies. International Journal of Management Research and Review, 2(78), 1183-1199. Retrieved from www.ijmrr.com

Panigrahi, A. (2017). Cultural diversity of Varanasi & its impact on visual identity of soft stone craft, Ramnagar: A perspective of design led innovation to empathize multiplicity. In A treatise on recent trends and sustainability in crafts & design (pp. 51-62).

Kathuria, K., Melchers, M., & Muller-Maige, M. (1988). The craft center.

Banik, S. (2017). A study on financial analysis of rural artisans in India: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 5(4), 119-137. https://ssrn.com/3137936

United Nations Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organization. (2009). Investing in cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue. UNESCO World Report.

Jena, P. K. (2010). Indian handicrafts in globalization times: An analysis of global local dynamics. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 8(2), 119-137. Retrieved from http://www.indecs.eu/2010/indecs2010-pp119-137.pdf

Hussain, A. (2016). Protection and promotion of traditional crafts and occupations in globalising India: A case study of weavers of Mau (Uttar Pradesh). International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(9), 2249-2496.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Pathak, S., & Dave, D. . (2024). GLOBALIZATION AND METAL REPOUSSÉ CRAFT OF VARANASI: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(2), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i2.2024.1460