FROM STORYTELLING TO STORY LIVING: EXPLORING THE METAVERSE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NEW AGE COMMUNICATOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.1117Keywords:
Story Living, Metaverse, Communications, Web 3.0, Innovation, Virtual Reality, Rhizomatic StructureAbstract [English]
In the unfolding landscape of the Fifth Industrial Revolution, the concept of the "Metaverse" has found resonance within our collective consciousness. This paper presents a critical examination of the transformative potential of the Metaverse in the context of media and technology, emphasizing its implications for the field of communications. Rooted in a rhizomatic paradigm marked by continuous transformation, the Metaverse encapsulates augmented and virtual reality, blockchain, artificial Intelligence, and Web3.0 technologies. This study focuses on the Metaverse through the lens of the communicator, exploring immersive experiences powered by technological convergence and their potential impact on content.
Building upon Baker et al.'s (2019) foundational insights, the research investigates the Metaverse's influence on media engagement and societal shifts. Nicholson et al.'s (2014) findings on collaboration within virtual world technology and Petit et al.'s (2019) exploration of consumer acceptance of digital objects provide a nuanced understanding of immersive communication. In the post-pandemic era, marked by rapid digital acceleration, the paper evaluates the Metaverse's role in shaping user behavior and societal structures, shedding light on its profound impact on media consumption patterns.
Delving into the convergence of media and technology within the Metaverse, the paper explores its potential implications on immersive storytelling. It scrutinizes the evolving landscape where reification, presence, and immersion converge to give rise to the emergent scenario of "Story Living," blurring the boundaries between reality and simulation.
The Metaverse prompts a deep and dynamic engagement with audiences and places them at the heart of the content piece. The introduction of interactivity and adaptive storytelling, facilitated by mixed reality technologies, empowers audiences to actively shape and participate in the narrative. This shift underscores the importance of adaptive multi-varied formats of communication within the immersive context of the Metaverse. Shin & Biocca's (2017) research on virtual world, Chelsea et al.'s formulation of Hierarchy of Needs for User Experiences in Virtual Reality, as well as Thomas and David’s (1992) insights about modeling immersive environments provide a comprehensive analysis of the intersection between media, technology, and consumer experiences within this dynamic space. The paper seeks inspiration from Ahn et.al's framework on bifold, triadic relationships to understand the nuances of human interactions unfolding in the metaverse.
The paper acknowledges the adoption of the Metaverse beyond traditional gaming and corporate training. The integration of immersive environments by fashion brands, and investments by major brands in this space as outlined by Rauschnabel et al., (2022) signal an ongoing shift in brand focus. Shen's (2002) examination of measurement methodologies and strategic considerations, underscores the need for critical assessment in academic discourse. By grasping the opportunities and challenges presented by the empowered audience within the Metaverse, this study enriches discussions on the cultural and societal impacts of the Metaverse for the new-age media communicator.
References
Ahn, S.J., and Jeremy N. Bailenson. “Self-Endorsing versus Other-Endorsing in Virtual Environments.” Journal of Advertising 40, no. 2 (2011): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400207
Ahn, Sun Joo, Jooyoung Kim, and Jaemin Kim. “The Bifold Triadic Relationships Framework: A Theoretical Primer for Advertising Research in the Metaverse.” Journal of Advertising 51, no. 5 (December 2022): 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2111729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2111729
Arzy, S.L., S Overney, T Landis, and O Blanke. “Neural Mechanisms of Embodiment.” Archives of Neurology 63, no. 7 (2006): 1022–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.63.7.1022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.63.7.1022
Baker, Elizabeth White, Geoffrey S. Hubona, and Mark Srite. “Does ‘Being There’ Matter? The Impact of Web-Based and Virtual World’s Shopping Experiences on Consumer Purchase Attitudes.” Information & Management 56, no. 7 (November 1, 2019): 103153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.02.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.02.008
Biocca, F. “The Cyborg’s Dilemma: Progressive Embodiment in Virtual Environments.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, no. 2 (2006): 324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x
Bobrowsky, Meghan, and Sarah E. Needleman. “What Is the Metaverse? The Future Vision for the Internet.” Wall Street Journal, April 28, 2022. https://www.wsj.com/story/what-is-the-metaverse-the-future-vision-for-the-internet-ca97bd98.
Chelsea, Kelling, Heli Väätäjä, Otto Kauhanen, Jussi Karhu, Markku Turunen, Vesa Lindqvist, and Pasi Ikonen. “Hierarchy of Needs for User Experiences in Virtual Reality.” In Immersive Journalism as Storytelling- Ethics, Production and Design. Routlege: Taylor and Francis, 2020. https://www.routledge.com/Immersive-Journalism-as-Storytelling-Ethics-Production-and-Design/Uskali-Gynnild-Jones-Sirkkunen/p/book/9780367713300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429437748-14
Cooper, R., and M Foster. “Sociotechnical Systems.” American Psychologist, 1971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031539
Curtis, Mark, David Treat, Katie Burke, and Raghav `Narsalay. “Metaverse: Evolution, Then Revolution.” Accenture Research, 2023. https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/accenture-com/document/Accenture-Metaverse-Evolution-Before-Revolution.pdf#zoom=40.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus. Les Éditions de Minuit, 1980. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Thousand_Plateaus.
Evans, S.K., K.E. Pearce, J Vitak, and J.W. Treem. “Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22, no. 1 (2017): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
Franklin, Nancy, and Barbara Tversky. “Searching Imagined Environments.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119, no. 1 (1990): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.1.63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.119.1.63
Gauri, Pratik, and Jim Van Eerden. “What the Fifth Industrial Revolution Is and Why It Matters.” The European Sting & World Economic Forum., May 16, 2019. https://europeansting.com/2019/05/16/what-the-fifth-industrial-revolution-is-and-why-it-matters/
Gent, Edd. “Lessons From a Second Life > Before Meta, Philip Rosedale Created an Online Universe.” IEEE Spectrum 59, no. 1 (January 10, 2022): 19. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2022.9676346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2022.9676346
Gerathewohl, Siegfried J. Fidelity of Simulation and Transfer of Training. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1969. https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/AM69-24.pdf.
Gibson, JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., 1979.
Griffith, D.A., and Q Chen. “The Influence of Virtual Direct Experience (VDE) on on-Line Ad Message Effectiveness.” Journal of Advertising 33, no. 1 (2004): 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639153
Hackl, Cathy. “Defining The Metaverse Today.” Forbes. Accessed April 7, 2022. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cathyhackl/2021/05/02/defining-the-metaverse-today/.
Hunger in Los Angeles. VR 360, Immersive Journalism. Sundance Film Festival 2012, 2012. https://emblematicgroup.com/experiences/hunger-in-la/.
Jordan, Patrick W, and William S. Green. “Pleasure with Products: Human Factors for Body, Mind and Soul.” Human Factors in Product Design. Current Practise and Future Trends, London: Taylor & Francis, 1997, 206–7.
Joshua, Judy. “Information Bodies: Computational Anxiety in Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash.” Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 19, no. 1 (2017): 17–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.19.1.0017
Kerr, G, and J Richards. “Redefining Advertising in Research and Practice.” International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 2 (2021): 175–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1769407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1769407
Kim, G, and F Biocca. “Immersion in Virtual Reality Can Increase Exercise Motivation and Physical Performance,” 94–102. Las Vegas, NV: Springer, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91584-5_8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91584-5_8
Kim, J, S.J. Ahn, E.S. Kwon, and L.N. Reid. “TV Advertising Engagement as a State of Immersion and Presence.” Journal of Business Research 76 (2017): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.001
Kim, J.J, T Shinaprayoon, and S.J.G. Ahn. “Virtual Tours Encourage Intentions to Travel and Willingness to Pay via Spatial Presence, Enjoyment, and Destination Image.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 1 (2022): 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2021.1962441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2021.1962441
Krishna, Aradhna. “An Integrative Review of Sensory Marketing: Engaging the Senses to Affect Perception, Judgment and Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 22, no. 3 (August 17, 2011): 332–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003
Leckenby, J.D., and H Li. “From the Editors: Why We Need the Journal of Interactive Advertising.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 1, no. 1 (2000): 1–3. https://doi.org/0.1080/15252019.2000.10722039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2000.10722039
Li, H, T Daugherty, and F Biocca. “Impact of 3-D Advertising on Product Knowledge, Brand Attitude, and Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Presence.".” Journal of Advertising 31, no. 3 (2002): 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675
Li, H, T Daugherty, and F Biocca. “Impact of 3-D Advertising on Product Knowledge, Brand Attitude, and Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Presence.” Journal of Advertising 31, no. 3 (2002): 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673675
Liu, Y, and L.J. Shrum. “A Dual-Process Model of Interactivity Effects.” Journal of Advertising 38, no. 2 (2009): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367380204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367380204
Lombard, M, and T Ditton. “At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, no. 2 (2006): 321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
Manuel, Robert. “Game Trends: Moving Beyond the Metaverse.” Medium, January 20, 2021. https://medium.com/@writermanuel/game-trends-moving-beyond-the-metaverse-be9ea53fe32f.
McCain, J, SJG Ahn, and W.K. Campbell. “Is Desirability of the Trait a Boundary Condition of the Proteus Effect? A Pilot Study.” Communication Research Reports 35, no. 5 (2018): 445–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1531212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1531212
McMahan, R.P., D.A. Bowman, D.J. Zielinski, and R.B. Brady. “Evaluating Display Fidelity and Interaction Fidelity in a Virtual Reality Game.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, no. 4 (2012): 626–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.43
Milgram, Paul, and Fumio Kishino. “A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays.” IEICE Trans. Information Systems E77-D, no. 12 (December 1, 1994): 1321–29.
Nan, X, and R.J Faber. “Advertising Theory: Reconceptualizing the Building Blocks.” Marketing Theory 4, no. 1–2 (2004): 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044085
Nicholson, Jennifer, Darren Nicholson, Patrick Coyle, Andrew Hardin, and Anjala Krishen. “Exploring the Use of Virtual World Technology for Idea-Generation Tasks.” International Journal of E-Collaboration 10 (October 27, 2014): 44–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2014070103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2014070103
Noble, et al, 2022) (Noble, Stephanie M., Martin Mende, Dhruv Grewal, and A. Parasuraman. “The Fifth Industrial Revolution: How Harmonious Human–Machine Collaboration Is Triggering a Retail and Service [R]Evolution.” Journal of Retailing 98, no. 2, 2022 (n.d.): 199–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.04.003
North of 41. “What Really Is the Difference between AR / MR / VR / XR ?” Medium, March 20, 2018. https://medium.com/@northof41/what-really-is-the-difference-between-ar-mr-vr-xr-35bed1da1a4e.
Petit, Olivia, Carlos Velasco, and Charles Spence. “Digital Sensory Marketing: Integrating New Technologies Into Multisensory Online Experience.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 45 (December 18, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.004
Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1
Pietschmann, Daniel, and Peter Ohler. “Spatial Mapping of Physical and Virtual Spaces as an Extension of Natural Mapping: Relevance for Interaction Design and User Experience.” In In: Shumaker, R., Lackey, S. (Eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality., 9179:49–59. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Cham, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21067-4_6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21067-4_6
Rauschnabel, Philipp A., Babin Barry, Tom Dieck, M Claudia, Nina Krey, and Timothy Jung. “What Is Augmented Reality Marketing? Its Definition, Complexity, and Future.” Journal of Business Research 142 (March 2022): 1140–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.084
Repp, B.H., and G. Knoblich. “Perceiving Action Identity.” Psychological Science 15, no. 9 (2004): 604–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00727.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00727.x
Rice, R.E. “Media Appropriateness.” Human Communication Research 19, no. 4 (1993): 451–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00309.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00309.x
Rodgers, S, and E Thorson. “The Interactive Advertising Model.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 1, no. 1 (2000): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2000.10722043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2000.10722043
Rodgers, Shelly, and Esther Thorson. “The Interactive Advertising Model: How Users Perceive and Process Online Ads.” Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2000.10722043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2000.10722043
Ruyter, K de, J Heller, T Hilken, M Chylinski, D.I. Keeling, and D Mahr. “Seeing with the Customer’s Eye: Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of AR Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 49, no. 2 (2020): 109–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1740123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1740123
Schmitt, B. “Experiential Marketing.” Journal of Marketing Management 15, no. 1–3 (1999): 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784870496
Schubert, T.W. “The Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments.” Zeitschrift Für Medienpsychologie 15, no. 2 (2003): 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-6383.15.2.69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-6383.15.2.69
Schwab, Klaus. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution. What It Means and How to Respond.” Foreign Affairs & World Economic Forum, December 12, 2015. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/fourth-industrial-revolution
Schwab, Klaus. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Publishing Group, 2016
Searching Imagined Environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 119, no. 1 (1990): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.1.63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.119.1.63
Shen, F. “Banner Advertisement Pricing, Measurement, and Pretesting Practices: Perspectives from Interactive Agencies.” Journal of Advertising 31, no. 3 (2002): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673676
Shin, Donghee, and Frank Biocca. “Exploring Immersive Experience in Journalism.” New Media & Society 20, no. 8 (2018): 2800–2823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817733133
Simmonds, L.S., L.S. Bogomolova, R Kennedy, M Nenycz‐Thiel, and S Bellman. “A Dual‐Process Model of How Incorporating Audio‐Visual Sensory Cues in Video Advertising Promotes Active Attention.” Psychology & Marketing 37, no. 8 (2020): 1057–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21357
Slater, M, and M Usoh. “" A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, no. 6 (1969): 603–16. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
Slater, M, and M Usoh. “Representations Systems, Perceptual Position, and Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2, no. 3 (1993): 221–33. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1993.2.3.221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1993.2.3.221
Smink, A.R., E.A. Van Reijmersdal, G Van Noort, and P.C. Neijens. “Shopping in Augmented Reality: The Effects of Spatial Presence, Personalization and Intrusiveness on App and Brand Responses.” Journal of Business Research 118 (2020): 474–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.018
Stern, Barbara B. “A Revised Communication Model for Advertising: Multiple Dimensions of the Source, the Message, and the Recipient” 23, no. 2 (June 3, 2013): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1994.10673438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1994.10673438
Steuer, J. “Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence.” 42, no. 4 (1992): 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
Strong Jr., E.K. “Theories of Selling.” Journal of Applied Psychology 9, no. 1 (1925): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070123
Thomas, P.C., and W.M. David. “Augmented Reality: An Application of Heads-up Display Technology to Manual Manufacturing Processes.” Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 1992, 659–69.
Trevino, L.K., R.H. Lengel, and R.L. Daft. “Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations.” Communication Research 14, no. 5 (1987): 553–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005006
What Is Artificial Intelligence? How Does AI Work? | Built In. Accessed April 7, 2022. https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence.
Wunderman Thompson Intelligence. “Into the Metaverse,” September 2021. https://www.vml.com/insight/new-trend-report-into-the-metaverse.
Yang, S, J.R. Carlson, and S Chen. “How Augmented Reality Affects Advertising Effectiveness: The Mediating Effects of Curiosity and Attention toward the Ad.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 102020, no. 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Manas Dewan, Dr. Ajit Gagare
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
