• Mirza Aamir Baig Department of Civil Engineering, Alfalah University, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-3808
  • Rizwan Rashid Department of Civil Engineering, Alfalah University, India




Shear Wall, Damping, Response Spectrum, Seismic Coefficient Method, Ductility


Seismic force, predominantly being an inertia force depends on the mass of the structure. As the mass of the structure increases the seismic forces also increase causing the requirement of even heavier sections to counter that heavy forces. And these heavy sections further increase the mass of the structure leading to even heavier seismic forces. Structural designers are met with huge challenge to balance these contradictory physical phenomena to make the structure safe. The structure no more can afford to be rigid.

This introduces the concept of ductility. The structures are made ductile, allowing it yield in order to dissipate the seismic forces. A framed structure can be easily made ductile by properly detailing of the reinforcement. But again, as the building height goes beyond a certain limit, these framed structure sections (columns) gets larger and larger to the extent that they are no more practically feasible in a structure. There comes the role of shear walls. Shear walls provide ample amount of stiffness to the building frame resisting loads through in plane bending. But they inherently make the structure stiffer. So, there must be a balance between the amount of shear walls and frame elements present in a structure for safe and economic design of high-rise structures.

Here an attempt has been made to study the behavior of different structures of reinforced concrete with different heights with and without shear walls. Coupled shear walls have also been studied to understand the comparative merit or demerit of framed structures with shear wall structures. Studies have been carried out on sample model structures and analysis has been carried out by ETABS software. It has been ensured to consider sample models that represent the current practices in structural design to include different structural configurations. Models having varied structural configurations like framed, shear wall, coupled shear wall, central core shear wall, core in core etc. have been taken into consideration. The inherent asymmetry present in the structures have also been dealt.

The results have been tabulated and plotted to study their comparative behavior and interaction with each other. The findings of the study have been summarized and discussed.


Download data is not yet available.


Datta. T. K Seismic analysis of structures, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte ltd, 2010

Chopra A K, Dynamics of Structures

Jain. S K, IIT Roorkee Review of Indian seismic code, IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002

Reddy K. R. C. Sandip A. Tupat (2012). “The effect of zone factors on wind and earthquake loads of high-rise structures”

Jain. S K and Navin C Nigam “Historical developments and current status of Earthquake Engineering in India

Mohapatra, A.K. & Mohanty, W.K. “An Overview of Seismic Zonation Studies in India”

Dean Kumar B. & Swami B.L.P. “Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters”

Varalakshmi V., Shiva Kumar G., Sunil Sarma R. (2014) “Analysis and Design of G+5 Residential Building”

Bagheri Bahador, Firoozabad Salimi Ehsan, and Yahyaei Mohammadreza (2012) “Comparative Study of the Static and Dynamic Analysis of Multi-Storey Irregular Building”

Sharma Mohit & Maru Savita (2011) “Dynamic Analysis of Multistoried Regular Building”

Shahzad Jamil Sardar and Umesh. N. Karadi (2014) “effect of change in shear wall

Location on storey drift of multistorey building subjected to lateral loads”

Yousuf Mohammed & shimpale P.M. (2013) “Dynamic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Building with Plan Irregularities”

Anshuman. S, Dipendu Bhunia, Bhavin Ramjiyani (2011) “Solution of Shear Wall Location in Multi-Storey Building”




How to Cite

BAIG, M. A., & Rashid, R. . (2020). EFFECT OF SHEAR WALL ON PERFORMANCE OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING. International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies, 4(5), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijoest.v4.i5.2020.111