MINORITY STUDENTS AND INTEGRATIONAL ISSUES IN AN INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN KURDISTAN

Authors

  • Vijay Kapur Instructor, the American University of Kurdistan, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i6.2018.1360

Keywords:

Minority, Integrational, Students

Abstract [English]

Over the last few decades, professionals have searched for generalized strategies and techniques to integrate students, but most often these studies have not examined the specific needs of minority students, who are segregated on ground of religion or cultural issues practiced by them, making them different from the majority others. These students often belong to different religious ethnicity and they make up a much smaller percentage and as a result, their experiences and needs at times gets lost and goes undetected. This article intends to investigate the gap between the ideal level of integration and the existing level between diverse groups of students and offers solutions towards bridging the gap in an international university in Kurdistan, northern Iraq.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Banks, J. A. (2001). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum and teaching (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Barth, F. (1969). Introduction in Barth F. (ed.) Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of cultural differences, London: Allen and Unwin, Cooper, R.S. (2003). Race, genes and health: New wine in old bottles? International Journal of Epidemiology, 32(1); 23-25.

Baubock, R. (1995). The integration of immigrant. Vienna, Austria: Institut fur Hohere Studien/ Institute for Advanced Studies in Vienna.

Chandra, K. (2006). What is ethnic identity and does it matter? Annual Review of Political Science, 9. 397-424.

Chang, M. J. (2005). Reconsidering the diversity rationale. Liberal Education, 2005, 91(1), 6–13.

Cohen, A.P. (1982) Belonging: Identity and Social Organisation in British Rural Cultures Issue 1 of Anthropological studies of Britain. Manchester University Press

Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032001099

Cross, S. and Rosenthal, R (1999). Three models of conflict resolution: Effects on intergroup expectancies and attitudes. Journal of Social Issues . Volume 55, Issue 3, pages 561–580. Fall 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00133

Deutsch, M. (1993). Cooperative learning and conflict resolution in an alternative high school. Cooperative Learning, 13, 2-5.

Eriksen, T.H. (2002). Ethnicity and nationalism. London. Pluto Press.

Fisher, R. (1994). General principles for resolving intergroup conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 47-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02397.x

Gaertner, S. L., Sedikides, C., and Graetz, K. (1999). In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 5–18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.5

Glazer, N. and Moynihan, D.P. (1975). Introduction, in Glazer, N. and Moynihan, D.P. (eds.) Ethnicity: Theory and experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hannafin, R., and Savenye, W. (1993). Technology in the classroom: The teacher‘s new role and resistance to it. Educational Technology, 33(6), 26-31.

Holst, F. (2012). Ethnicization and identity construction in Malaysia. Routledge Malaysian Studies Series. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121955

Howitt, D. (2010). Introduction to qualitative methods in psychology. Loughborough University.

Hutchinson, J. and Smith, A.D. (1996). Introduction, in Hutchinson, J. and Smith, A.D. (eds.) Ethnicity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., and Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256

Pettigrew, T.F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annu Rev Psychol. 1998; 49:65-85. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65

Riordan, C., & Ruggiero, J. (1980). Producing equal-status interracial interaction: A replication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 131-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3033757

Robinson, J. and Preston, J. (1976). Equal-Status Contact and Modification of Racial Prejudice: A Re-examination of the Contact Hypothesis. Social Forces, 54(4), p.911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2576183

Rudiger, A. and Spencer, S. (2003). Social integration of migrants and ethnic minorities. Policies to combat discrimination. OECD, Brussels. 2003.

Savenye, W. C., Davidson, G. V. and Orr, K. B. (1992). Effects of an educational computing course on pre-service teachers' attitudes toward computers. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 3, 31-41.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Kapur, V. (2018). MINORITY STUDENTS AND INTEGRATIONAL ISSUES IN AN INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN KURDISTAN. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 6(6), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i6.2018.1360