UNDERSTANDING AND COMMUNICATING THE CONCEPT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY – A STUDY OF 23 INDIAN COMPANIES IN EASTERN INDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v4.i6.2016.2635Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Stakeholdertheory, Strategic CSR, CorporateReputation, CorporateLegitimacy, Sustainability ReportAbstract [English]
The Companies Act 2013 in India with its mandate for CSR has formally introduced the concept of CSR to the board of Indian companies. The practice of CSR, although bordering on charity giving, is not a new idea to India. The critical situation that India is facing today has been brought about by multiple causes. Corporate bodies are the fundamental cells of modern economic life and should work towards affirming values and forging new patterns of living and better working conditions. Corporate’s should play a vital role towards contributing to the continuing health of the planet and to develop a just and humane society. The crisis faced by humanity today can be solved by the use of concerted corporate actions. Corporations are instruments of social purposes, formed within the society to accomplish useful social objectives. What the companies need to understand is the intention of this Act to undertake CSR activities which are systematic and strategic in nature to create a meaningful impact for the companies. Research was conducted among 23 Indian companies in Eastern India in the private sector engaged in manufacturing and heaving engineering. The authors developed a scorecard consisting of 46 criteria which was used to study the CSR activities of these companies as declared in their websites and in other published sources. The intention was to find out the complexity of the perception-practice dynamic and the nature of CSR practised by the companies. In-depth qualitative interview was conducted with the top management of the company giving a further insight into their understanding of the concept of CSR.
Downloads
References
Campbell, John L. 2007. Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 946‐967.
Carroll, Archie B. 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 268‐295.
Elkington, John. 2004. Enter the Triple Bottom Line. In: Adrian Henriques& Julie Richardson (Eds.). The Triple Bottom Line: Does it all add up? Assessing the sustainability of business and CSR, pp. 1‐16. London: Earthscan.
Fombrun, Charles J., Gardberg, Naomi A. & Sever, Joy M. 2000. The Reputation Quotient: A Multi stakeholder ensure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 241‐255.
Freeman, R. Edward &Velamuri, S. Ramakrishna. 2006. A New Approach to CSR: Company Stakeholder Responsibility. In: Andrew Kakabadse, Mette Morsing& Gilbert Lenssen (Eds.).Corporate Social Responsibility: Reconciling Aspiration with Application, pp. 245‐354. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599574_2
Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Hatch, Mary Jo & Schultz, Majken. 2003. Bringing the Corporation into Corporate Branding. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 37, No. 7/8, pp. 1041‐1064.
Matten, Dirk & Moon, Jeremy. 2005. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR. In: André Habisch, Jan Jonker, Marina Wegner and René Schmidpeter (Eds.). Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe, pp. 335‐356. Berlin: Springer.
Morsing, Mette. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility as strategic auto‐communication: on the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 171‐182.
Aruna Das Gupta, Ananda Das Gupta, (2008) "Corporate social responsibility in India: towards a sane society?", Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110810856965
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.