STEM ACTIVITIES WITH ROBOTIC CODING; THE EFFECT ON AWARENESS OF TEACHER CANDİDATES REGARDİNG ITS USE İN SCİENCE LESSONS

Keywords: STEM Activities, Robotics Coding, Science Subjects, Awareness

Abstract

STEM education, which focuses on improving students' 21st century skills, aims to increase interest in engineering professions that have a very important place in the future of the world. Due to continuous innovation in technologies, it is critical to provide STEM and robotics coding training to students. Knowing the content of studies in our country related to STEM is of great importance for awareness of its use in science course.  The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of robotics coding STEM activities on teacher candidates ' awareness of their use in science course. 37 science teacher candidates participated in the 12-week study.  Qualitative research method was used in this study.  Qualitative data was taken from the field notes and semi-structured interview. As part of STEM activities, it is aimed to teach teacher candidates Robotics Coding. In the activities, Arduino IDE, Fritzing programs were taught. Robotics coding STEM activities have had a positive impact on teacher candidates. Teacher candidates reported that activities increased their interest and attitude to science, and that they were instructive, fun, and useful. Teacher candidates expressed that robotics coding activities integrated into education system enabled making learning permanent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aydın, G., Saka, M. and Güzey, S. (2017). Examination of STEM (STEM) attitudes of 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade students in terms of some variables. Mersin University Journal of Education Faculty, 13 (2), 787-802. DOI: 10.17860 / mersinefd.290319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.290319

Berlin, D. F., ve Lee, H. (2005). Integrating science ve mathematics education: Historica analysis. School Science ve Mathematics, 105(1), 15-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18032.x

Beane, J. (1995). Curriculum integration ve the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622.

Bahar, M., Yener, D., Yılmaz M., Emen, H., & Gürer, F. (2018). 2018 Science changes in curriculum outcomes and science, technology, mathematics engineering (STEM) integration. Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal, 18 (2), 702-735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2018..-412111

Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978-988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006

Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM, 51(6), 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2

Burrows, S., Ginn, D. S., Love, N. ve Williams T. L. (1989). A strategy for curriculum integration of information skills instruction. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 77(3), 245-251.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. A., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.

Cameron, J. (2005). Focusing on the focus group. Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, 2(8), 116-132

Capraro, R. M. ve Slough, S. W. (2008). Project-based learning: an integrated science, technology, engineering, ve mathematics (STEM) approach. Rotterdam: The Netherlves: Sense Publishers.

Childress, V. W. (1996). Does integration technology, science, ve mathematics improve technological problem solving: A quasi‐experiment. Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), 16–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v8i1.a.2

Çepni, S. and Ormancı, Ü. (2017). The world of the future. Çepni, S. (Ed.), From Theory The application is in STEM + A + E Education (p.1-32). Ankara: Pegem Academy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052410561.01

Çepni, S. (2017). STEM + A + E education from theory to practice. Ankara: PegemAcademy.

Datteri, E. (2013). Predicting the long-term effects of human-robot interaction: A reflection on responsibility in medical robotics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 139-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9301-3

Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The Prospect of an" A" in STEM Education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2). 220-240

Gazibeyoğlu, T. (2018). Stem applications of 7th grade students their achievements in the energy unit and their attitude towards science lesson examination of the effect (Unpublished Master's thesis). Kastamonu University, Institute of Science, Kastamonu.

Güleryüz, H., Dilber, R., Erdoğan, İ. (2019). Opinions of Preservice Teachers on Using 3D Printer in STEM Applications. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University. Journal of Social Sciences 5 (2) 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31463/aicusbed.592061

Güleryüz, H., Dilber, R., Erdoğan, İ. (2020). Opinions of Teacher Candidates on Coding Education in STEM Applications. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen University. Journal of Social Sciences 6 (1). 71-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31463/aicusbed.610909

Güleryüz, (2020). The effect of 3D printer and robotic coding applications on 21st century learner skills of prospective teachers, STEM awareness and STEM teacher self-efficacy. Doctorate Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Educational Sciences. Erzurum.

Gültepe, A. A. (2018). Students are coding through the eyes of information technology teachers who teach coding. International Journal of Leadership Training, 2 (2), 50-60.

Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design ve implementation. Alexveria, VA: Association for Supervision ve Curriculum Development. Erişim adresi: goo.gl/z2kHBx

Khanlari, A. (2013). Effects of robotics on 21st century skills. European Scientific Journal, 9(27). 630-651.

Kuenzi, J.J. (2008). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, Federal Policy, and Legislative Action. Education Policy and Domestic Social Policy Division. Retrieved June 8, 2018 from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33434.pdf

Ministry of Education. (2018b). Science Education Program. Access address: goo.gl/yeKhDc

Ríordáin, M. N., Johnston, J., & Walshe, G. (2016). Making mathematics and science integration happen: key aspects of practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 233-255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1078001

Sayın, Z., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Coding education as a new 21st century skill and its effect on education policies. Academic Informatics Conference, 2016, 3-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20186

Smith, J. ve Karr-Kidwell, P. (2000). The interdisciplinary curriculum: a literary review ve a manual for administrators ve teachers. Erişim adresi: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED443172.pdf

Sullıvan, F. V. (2008). Robotics and science literacy: Thinking skills, science process skills and systems understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 373-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20238

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Sweller, J. (1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learnin ve problem solving in mathematics ve science. Journal of Educatio Psychology, 81(4), 457-466. Erişim adresi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.81.4.457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.457

Şenol, Ş., & Demirer V. (2017). Information Technologies and Software in Systematics from Coding Education to Robot Technology Course Teaching Program Example and Teachers' Views. 26th International Educational Sciences Congress, Analya.

Şenol, a. K., & Büyük, U. (2015). Robotik destekli fen ve teknoloji laboratuvar uygulamaları: Robolab. Electronic Turkish Studies, 10(3), 170-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.7953

Verma, A. (2015). Chına is teaching coding much, much earlier than USA ve India. Erişim adresi: goo.gl/uBRZo2

Verma, A. (2016). Japan Just Made Computer Programming A compulsory subject in its schools. Erişim adresi: goo.gl/8A6SYm.

Walan, S. (2019). The dream performance – a case study of young girls’ development of interest in STEM and 21st century skills, when activities in a makerspace were combined with drama. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1647157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1647157

Wang, H. (2012). A New era of science education: science teachers‘ perceptions ve classroom practices of science, technology, engineering, ve mathematics (STEM) ıntegration. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University of Minnesota. Erişim adresi: goo.gl/6rVdZY

Welch, A., & Huffman, D. (2011). The effect of robotics competitions on high school students' attitudes toward science. School Science and Mathematics, 111(8), 416-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00107.x

YEĞİTEK. (2019). 2023 Education Vision. 17. Quality and Success Symposium. (13 April 2019). Bursa.

Published
2021-12-01
How to Cite
GÜLERYÜZ, H., & DİLBER, R. (2021). STEM ACTIVITIES WITH ROBOTIC CODING; THE EFFECT ON AWARENESS OF TEACHER CANDİDATES REGARDİNG ITS USE İN SCİENCE LESSONS. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 8(11), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v8.i11.2021.1063