GLOBAL ACCOUNTING REGULATION: IMPACT OF IFAC ON FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY
Keywords:Corporate Governance, Financial Reporting Quality, IFAC
This paper provides an analysis of various dimensions of accounting and corporate governance that have led to the currently troubling state of affairs in the financial reporting environment. Good Corporate Governance (GCG) is a mandatory requirement in today’s corporate world by every stakeholder groups. Failure of giant corporate groups in the last twothree decades strengthens the demand further. And surprisingly, in some of such failures, accounting as a discipline is held liable. The way accounting is practiced or the interpretations that may give different prescriptions in similar situations are some dark areas that may open some scope for the corrupted accountants. The paper covers the concept of corporate governance, its legal framework, its current status and how accounting may be practiced to protect corporates from corruption by establishing governance. The paper analyzes how IFAC is succeeding as an international standard setter with an established place in the global financial infrastructure and it reveals a growing reliance on governance by experts together with a growth in influence of the large, multinational accounting firms. Until corporate boards are truly independent of corporate management and are knowledgeable enough to act as effective shareholder advocates, changes in accounting will be of limited impact.
Annisette, M. (2004), “The true nature of the World Bank”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 303‐23. [CrossRef] [Infotrieve] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00064-9
Biddle, G.C., Hilary, G., Verdi, R.S. (2009). How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Journal of Accounting and Economics 48, 112–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.001
Bradbury, M. Mak, Y. & Tan, S. (2006). Board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and abnormal accruals. Pacific Accounting Review,No 18, 47-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580610732813
Bebchuk, L. A. and Grinstein, Y. 2005. The Growth of Executive Pay, Oxford Review of DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11443
Economic Policy, Vol. 21, pp. 283-303.
Black, B. S., Jang, H. & Kim, W. 2006. Predicting Firms' Corporate Governance Choices: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.001
Evidence from Korea, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 12, pp. 660-691.
Cadbury, S. A. 1992. Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate
Governance, Financial Reporting Council, United Kingdom. Available from
http://www.nccg.ru/en/site.xp/057053057124.html (Accessed on July 8, 2006)
Curtis, E. and Turley, S. (2005), “From business risk audits to audit risk standards”, paper presented at the 28th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Goteborg Ditropoulos, P. & Asteriou, D. (2010). The Effect of Board Composition on the Informativeness and Quality of Annual Earnings: Empirical Evidence from Greece, Research in International Business and Finance,No 24, 190-205.
Humphrey, C., Loft, A., Turley, S. and Jeppesen, K. (2006), “The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC): private global governance in the public interest?”, in Schuppert, G.F. (Ed.), Global Governance and the Role of Non‐State Actors, Nomos Verlag, Baden‐Baden, pp. 245‐73.
IFAC (2006), Facts about IFAC, available at: www.ifac.org/MediaCenter/files/facts_about_IFAC.pdf
Knight, M.D. (2005), Challenges to financial stability in the current global macroeconomic environment, availailable at: www.bis.org/speeches/sp050906.htm (accessed 5 February 2006).
Moravcsik, A. (2004), “Is there a ‘democratic deficit’ in world politics? A framework for analysis”, Government and Opposition, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 336‐63. [CrossRef], [ISI] [Infotrieve] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00126.x
Murthy, N. R. N. 2006. Good Corporate Governance – A checklist or a mindset? Robert P. Maxon Lecture, George Washington University.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). White Paper on Corporate Governance in Asia. Available from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4/12/2956774. Pdf (Accessed on April 22, 2006).
O'Connell, B.T. (2004), “B.T. Enron.con He that filches from me my good name … makes me poor indeed”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15 Nos 6/7, pp. 733‐49. [CrossRef] [Infotrieve] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2004.02.002
Oman, C. P. 2001. Corporate Governance and National Development, OECD Development Center, Technical Papers No. 180. Paris.
Shama, F. (2006). Institutional Ownership and corporate value, Managerial Finance, Vol 32 No 3, 247-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350610646753
Sikka, P. (2001), “Regulation of accountancy and the power of capital: some observations”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 199‐211. [CrossRef] [Infotrieve] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2001.0466
Shil1, N. C. (2008) Accounting for Good Corporate Governance Accounting for good corporate Governance, JOAAG, Vol. 3. No. 1
Thirkell‐White, B. (2004), “The international financial architecture: soft law, power and legitimacy”, IPEC papers in Global Political Economy, No. 13, June.
UNCTAD (2005), “Do global standards and codes prevent financial crises? Some proposals on modifying the standards based approach”, available at: www.unctad.org/en/docs/osgdp20051_en.pdf.
Woods, N. (2002), “Global governance and the role of institutions”, in Held, D. and McGrew, A. (Eds), Governing Globalisation: Power, Authority and Global Governance, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 25‐45.
How to Cite
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- That its release has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Authors who publish with International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
For More info, please visit CopyRight Section