• Moushira Abdallah Mohamed School of Science, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 318 Liuhe Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 31002, P. R. CHINA
  • Shuhui Wu School of Science, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 318 Liuhe Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 31002, P. R. CHINA
  • Laure Deveriane Dushime School of Science, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 318 Liuhe Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 31002, P. R. CHINA
  • Yuanhong Tao School of Science, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 318 Liuhe Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 31002, P. R. CHINA



Federated Learning, Differential Privacy, Shuffle Model, Privacy Amplification.


The emerging of shuffle model has attracted considerable attention of scientists owing to his unique properties in solving the privacy problems in federated learning, specifically the trade off problem between privacy and utility in central and local model. Where, the central model relies on a trusted server which collects users’ raw data and then perturbs it. While in the local model all users perturb their data locally then they send their perturbed data to server. Both models have pron and con. The server in central model enjoys with high accuracy but the users suffer from insufficient privacy in contrast, the local model which provides sufficient privacy at users’ side but the server suffers from limited accuracy. Shuffle model has advanced property of hide position of input messages by perturbing it with perturbation π. Therefore, the scientists considered on adding shuffle model between users and servers to make the server untrusted where the users communicate with the server through the shuffle and boosting the privacy by adding perturbation π for users’ messages without increasing the noise level. Consequently, the usage of modified technique differential privacy federated learning with shuffle model will explores the gap between privacy and accuracy in both models. So this new model attracted many researchers in recent work. In this review, we initiate the analytic learning of a shuffled model for distributed differentially private mechanisms. We focused on the role of shuffle model for solving the problem between privacy and accuracy by summarizing the recent researches about shuffle model and its practical results. Furthermore, we present two types of shuffle, single shuffle and m shuffles with the statistical analysis for each one in boosting the privacy amplification of users with the same level of accuracy by reasoning the practical results of recent papers.


Download data is not yet available.


Aledhari M., Razzak R., Parizi R., Saeed F. (2020), Federated learning: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications, IEEE Access, 8, 140699-140725. Retreived from

Amos B., Kobbi N., and Eran O. (2008), Distributed private data analysis: Simultaneously solving how and what, 28th Annual International Cryptology Conference, Springer, 5157, 451-468.

Amos Beimel., Iftach Haitner., Kobbi Nissim. (2020), Uri Stemmer., On the Round Complexity of the Shuffle Model, arXiv: 2009.13510. Retreived from DOI:

Balcer V., Cheu A. (2019), Separating local & shuffled differential privacy via histograms, arXiv: 1911.06879.

Balle B., Barthe G., Gaboardi M. (2018), Privacy amplification by sub sampling: Tight analyses via couplings and divergences, ArXiv:1807.01647.

Balle B., Bell J., Gascon A., Nissim K. (2019), The privacy blanket of the shuffle model, arXiv: 1903.02837, Retreived from DOI:

Bittau A., Erlingsson U., Maniatis P., Mironov I., Raghunathan A., Lie D., Rudominer M., Kode U., Tinnes J., Seefeld B. (2017), PROCHLO: Strong privacy for analytics in the crowd. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), 441-459. Retreived from DOI:

Borja Balle, James Bell, Adria Gascon, Kobbi Nissim (2019). Differentially Private Summation with Multi-Message Shuffling. arXiv:1906.09116v1 [cs.CR]. Retreived from

Borja Balle., James Bell., Adrià Gascón., and Kobbi Nissim. (2020), Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Model. In Proceedings of the 2020ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security ,Virtual Event, USA. 9-13, 2020. Retreived from DOI:

C. Dwork. (2011), Affirm foundation for private data analysis, Communications of the ACM, 54(1), 86-95. Retreived from DOI:

Casey Meehan., Amrita Roy Chowdhury., Kamalika Chaudhuri., Somesh Jha. (2021), A Shuffling frame work for local differential privacy, arXiv: 2106.06603v1.

Chen M., Yang Z., Saad W., Yin C., Poor H V., Cui S. (2021), A Joint Learning and Communications Framework for Federated Learning Over Wireless Networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 20(1), 269-283. Retreived from DOI:

Cheu A., Smith A., Ullman J., Zeber D., Zhilyaev M. (2019), Distributed differential privacy via shuffling, 11476, 375-403. Retreived from DOI:

David Byrd. (2020), Antigoni Polychroniadou., Differentially Private Secure Multi-Party Computation for Federated Learning in Financial Applications, arXiv: 2010.05867. DOI:

Ding B., Kulkarni J., Yekhanin S. (2017), Collecting telemetry data privately, in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Long Beach, CA, 3571-3580.

Dwork C. (2006), Differential Privacy, Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on automata, languages and programming, 2, 1-12. Retreived from DOI:

Dwork C. (2008), Differential privacy: a survey of results, International conference on theory and applications of models of computation, 4978, 1-19. Retreived from DOI:

Erlingsson Ú., Pihur, V., Korolova, A. (2014), Rappor: Randomized aggregable privacy-preserving ordinal response, Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on computer and communications security, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 1054-1067. Retreived from DOI:

Farokhi., Farhad. (2021), Distributionally-robust machine learning using locally differentially-private data, springer Science and Business Media LLC. 1-13. Retreived from DOI:

Geyer R C., Klein T., Nabi M. (2020), Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspective, IEEE Access, 8, 140699-140725. Retreived from DOI:

Ghazi B., Golowich N., Kumar R., Manurangsi P., Pagh R., Velingker A., Pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages, arXiv:2002.01919, 2020. Retreived from

Ghazi B., Golowich N., Kumar R., Pagh R., Velingker A. (2020), On the power of multiple anonymous messages, arXiv:1908.11358.

Ghazi B., Golowich N., Kumar R., Manurangsi P., Pagh R., Velingker A. (2020), Pure differentially private summation from anonymous messages, arXiv:2002.01919.

Ghazi B., Manurangsi P., Pagh R., Velingker A. (2020) Private aggregation from fewer anonymous messages. 39th Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, Zagreb, Croatia, Proceedings, 47,798-827. Retreived from DOI:

H. B. McMahan, D. Ramage, K. Talwar, and L. Zhang (2018), "Learning Differentially Private Recurrent Language Models," in arXiv:1710.06963 [cs].

H. B. McMahan., D. Ramage., Talwar K., Zhang L. (2018), Learning Differentially Private Recurrent Language Models, arXiv:1710.06963.

Hard A., Rao K., Mathews R., et al. (2018), Federated learning formable keyboard prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604.

Huang L., A. L. Shea., Qian H., Masurkar A., Deng H., Liu D. (2019), Patient clustering improves efficiency of federated machine learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed electronic medical records, J. Biomed. Informat, 99, 1-21. Retreived from DOI:

Huang Xixi., Ding Ye., Jiang Zoe L., Qi Shuhan., Wang Xuan., Liao Qing. (2020), DP-FL: a Novel differentially private federated learning framework for the unbalanced data World Wide Web-internet and Web Information Systems, 23(4), 2529-2545. Retreived from DOI:

Jiang L., Tan R., Lou X., Lin G. (2019), On lightweight privacy preserving collaborative learning for Internet-of-Things objects, in Proc. Int. Conf. Internet Things Design Implement., 70-81. Retreived from DOI:

Jordan Awan., Aleksandra Slavkovi'c. (2018), Structure and Sensitivity in Differential Privacy: Comparing K-Norm Mechanisms, arXiv:1801.09236.

Kairouz P., McMahan H B., et al. (2021) Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1), 1-119. Retreived from DOI:

Li T., Sahu K., Talwalkar A., Smith V. (2020), Federated learning challenges, methods, and future directions, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50-60. Retreived from DOI:

Li W., Milletarì F.,Xu D.,Rieke N .,Hancox J., Zhu W., Baust M., Cheng Y .,Ourselin S.,J C M ., Feng A. (2019), Privacy-preserving federated brain tumor segmentation, in Proc. Int. Workshop Mach. Learn. Med. Image, 11861,133-141. Retreived from DOI:

Liu D., Miller T., Sayeed R., Mandl K. (2018), FADL: Federated autonomous deep learning for distributed electronic health record, arXiv:1811.11400.

Liu F. (2019) Generalized Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy, in IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 31, 747-756. Retreived from DOI:

Liu R., Cao Y. , Chen H., Guo R., Yoshikawa M. (2020), FLAME: Differentially Private Federated Learning in the Shuffle Model, arXiv:2009.08063.

McMahan H., Moore E., Ramage D., Hampson S., and Arcas B. (2016), Communication efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data, arXiv:1602.05629.

Nakamoto S. (2019), Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.Manubot;Online. Retreived from

NhatHai Phan., Xintao Wu., Han Hu., Dejing Dou. (2017), Adaptive Laplace Mechanism: Differential Privacy Preservation in Deep Learning" IEEE International Conference on Data Mining 17, 2374-8486. DOI:

Qi Liu., Juan Yu., Jianmin Han., Xin Yao. (2021), Differentially private and utility-aware publication of trajectory data, Expert Systems with Applications, 180, 1-14. Retreived from DOI:

Ramaswamy S.,Mathews R., Rao K., Beaufays F. (2019), Federated learning for emoji prediction in amobile keyboard, arXiv:1906.04329.

Ren J., Wang H., Hou T., Zheng S., Tang C. (2019), Federated learning-based computation offloading optimization in edge computing supported Internet of Things, IEEE Access, 7, 69194-69201. Retreived from DOI:

Sarfaraz., Aaliya., Chakrabortty., Ripon K., Essam., Daryl L. (2021), A tree structure-based improved block chain framework for a secure online bidding system, 102, 1-20. Retreived from DOI:

Ulfar Erlingsson., Vitaly Feldman., Ilya Mironov., Ananth Raghunathan., Kunal Talwar. (2019), and Abhradeep Thakurta., Ampliffication by shuffling: From local to central differential privacy via anonymity. the Thirtieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2468-2479. Retreived from DOI:

Victor Balcer., Albert Cheu., Matthew Joseph., and Jieming Mao. (2020), Connecting robust shuffle privacy and pan-privacy. arXiv:2004.09481. Retreived from DOI:

Vitaly Feldman., Ilya Mironov., Kunal Talwar., Abhradeep Thakurta. (2018), Privacy amplification by iteration, In 59th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Paris, France, 521-532. Retreived from DOI:

Wei K., et al. (2020), "Federated Learning With Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysis," in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15, 3454-3469. Retreived from DOI:

Yang Q., Liu Y., Chen T., et al. (2019), Federated machine learning: concept and applications, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1-19. Retreived from DOI:

Yang T., Andrew G., Eichner H., et al. (2018), Applied federated learning: improving google keyboard query suggestions, arXiv:1812.02903.

Zhao L., Wang Q., Zou Q., Zhang Y., Chen Y. (2020), Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Deep Learning With Unreliable Participants, in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15, 1486-1500. Retreived from DOI:

Zhao. P., Zhang, G., Wan, S., Liu, G., Umer, T. (2019), A survey of local differential privacy for securing internet of vehicles. J. Supercomputer, 76, 1-22. Retreived from DOI:

Zhu T., Ye D., Wang W., Zhou W., Yu P. (2020), More Than Privacy: Applying Differential Privacy in Key Areas of Artificial Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2020.3014246. Retreived from DOI:




How to Cite

Ahmed, M. A. M., Wu, S., Dushime , L. D., & Tao, Y. (2021). RECENT PROGRESS OF DIFFERENTIALLY PRIVATE FEDERATED LEARNING WITH THE SHUFFLE MODEL. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 8(11), 55–75.