ON COMPARING MULTI-LAYER PERCEPTRON AND LOGISTIC REGRESSION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF DIABETIC PATIENTS IN FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER YOLA, ADAMAWA STATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v8.i6.2021.961Keywords:
Logistic Regression, Multi-Layer Perceptron, Artificial Neural Network, Log-Likelihood Ratio, Diabetes MellitusAbstract
The logistic regression (LR) and Multi-Layer (MLP) are used to handle regression analysis when the dependent response variable is categorical. Therefore, this study assesses the performance of LR and MLP in terms of classification of object/observations into identified component/groups. A data set consists of 553 cases of diabetes were collected at Federal Medical Center, . The variables measured: Age(years), Mass of a patient(kg/meters), glucose level (plasma glucose concentration, a 2-hour in an oral glucose tolerance test), pressure (Diastolic blood pressure ), insulin (2-hour serum insulin mu U/ml) and class variable (0 or 1) treating 0 as false or negative and 1 treated as true or positive test for diabetes. The method used in the study is Logistic regression analysis and the multi-Layer , a type of Artificial Neural Network, confusion matrix, classification, network algorithm and SPSS version 21 for Windows 10.1. The result of the study showed that LP classifies diabetic patients correctly with 91.8% accuracy. it classifies non-diabetic patients with 89.1% accuracy. MLP classifies diabetic patients with 88.6% accuracy while it classifies non-diabetic patients with 93.2% classification accuracy. Overall, MLP classifies better with 91% accuracy while LR classifies with 90.6% accuracy. This study complements other where MLP, a type Artificial neural network classifies and predicts better than other non-neural network classifiers.
Downloads
References
Chao, S. and Wong, F. (2009). An incremental decision tree learning methodology regarding attributes in medical data mining. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Baoding.
Hosmer, D. W. &Lemeshow, S., & Klar, J. (1988). A goodness-of- fit test for the multiple regression model. Communications in Statistics, A10, 1043-1069.
Hosmer, D. W &Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed, 1-2. Wiley and sons inc.
Joaquim, P., Marques de Sá. (2007). Applied Statistics Using SPSS, STATISTICA, MATLAB and R. 2nd Edition. Springer-Verlag Berlin.
Karegowda, A.G. and Jayaram, M.A. (2009). Cascading GA & CFS for feature subset selection in medical data mining. IEEE: 1-4.
Lewicki, P, Hill. T. (2006). Statistics: Methods and Applications: Comprehensive Reference for Science, Industry, and Data Mining. StatSoft, Inc.
Muhammad, M. U., Jiadong, R., Sohail, M. N., Irshad, M., Bilal M., Osi, A. A., (2018). A logistic regression modeling on the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the North Western Part of Nigeria, Benin Journal of StatisticsVol. 1, pp. 1- 10.
Podgorelec, V. and Maribor, H.M. (2005). Improving mining of medical data by outliers pre-dictions. IEEE: 1-6.
Stephen. V. (1997) Selecting and Interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote sensing of environment, 77-89.
Tang, P.H. and Tseng, M.H. (2009). Medical data mining using BGA & RGA for weighting of features in Fuzzy KNN classi_cation. IEEE, 5: 1-6.
Wang, S. and Zhou, G.G. (2005). Application of fuzzy clusters analysis for medical imagedata mining. IEEE, 2: 1-6.
Wehrens, Ron. (2010). Chemometrics with R Multivariate Data Analysis in the Natural Sciences and Life Sciences. Springer.
Xue, W. and Yanan S. Y. (2006). Research and application of data mining in traditional Chinese medical clinic diagnosis. IEEE, 4: 1-4.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- That its release has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
For More info, please visit CopyRight Section
