DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: EVALUATING TOOLS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVES

Authors

  • Dr. Malak Al Dirani Skema Business School, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v6.i13.2026.1745

Keywords:

Digital Era, Project Management, Virtual Collaboration, Real-Time Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The digital era has profoundly transformed project management practices, creating both opportunities and challenges for professionals across diverse age groups and experience levels. This study investigates how technological advancements, including virtual collaboration tools, real-time data analytics, and artificial intelligence, influence the effectiveness of project management and decision-making. A survey-based methodology was employed, collecting responses from participants representing varied age cohorts and levels of professional experience. Data analysis focused on perceptions of the benefits of digital tools for enhancing collaboration, optimizing resources, improving forecasting accuracy, and improving overall project outcomes. The findings reveal that younger professionals and those with less experience generally perceive greater advantages from digital integration, demonstrating higher satisfaction with the efficacy of contemporary project management methods. In contrast, older and more experienced participants tend to offer more cautious or moderate evaluations, reflecting nuanced insights shaped by extensive professional practice. Overall, the study highlights the positive role of digital technologies in promoting cross-functional collaboration, informed decision-making, and creativity within project teams. These results underscore the importance of adopting hybrid approaches that combine traditional project management principles with digital innovations to optimize outcomes. The research provides practical implications for organizations seeking to implement technology-driven project management strategies while considering the diverse perspectives and adaptability of their workforce.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J., and Creswell, D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Management Review, 14, 490–495.

Gianluca, E., Alessandro, M., and Secundo, G. (2021). Project Management Canvas: A Systems Thinking Framework to Address Project Complexity. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 809–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2020-0128

Guan, C., Mou, J., and Zhiying, J. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Education: A Twenty-Year Data-Driven Historical Analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001

Guinan, P., Parise, S., and Langowitz, N. (2019). Creating an Innovative Digital Project Team: Levers to Enable Digital Transformation. Business Horizons, 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.005

Gunnar, A., and JokischPavel, O. (2019). Revisiting Automated Project Management in the Digital Age: A Survey of AI Approaches. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(1)27-39

Gupta, C., Jose, M.-C., and Gupta, V. (2022). Measuring Impact of Cloud Computing and Knowledge Management in Software Development and Innovation. Systems, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050151

Hanna, N. (2018). A Role for the State in the Digital Age. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0086-3

Hox, J., and Boeije, H. (2005). Data Collection, Primary Versus Secondary. In Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (Vol. 1,593–599). https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00041-4

Muluken, A., and Ayenew, Z. (2022). Do Paradoxical Virtual Leadership and Emotional Intelligence Have Relationships? In Particular, There are Concerns About Technology Dependence, Geographical Dispersion, and Human Capital Tensions. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 1–25.

Saif, M., and Kinyó, L. (2020). Constructivist Theory is a Foundation for the use of Digital Technology in Lifelong Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 90–109. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.803364

Salvador, J. (2016). Exploring Quantitative and Qualitative Methodologies: A Guide to Novice Nursing Researchers. European Scientific Journal, 12(18). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n18p107

Sascha, K., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., and Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art in Research. SAGE Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576

Simion, C.-P., Popa, S.-C., and Albu, C. (2018). Project Management 4.0: Project Management in the Digital Era. In Proceedings of the 12th International Management Conference (1–2). Bucharest, Romania.

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology: How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035

Usama, A., Bhatti, S. H., Shamim, S., and Khan, Z. (2022). The Role of Big Data Analytics in Manufacturing Agility and Performance: Moderation-Mediation Analysis of Organizational Creativity and of the Involvement of Customers as Data Analysts. British Journal of Management, 1200–1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12549

Ustundag, A., and Cevikcan, E. (2017). Industry 4.0: Managing the Digital Transformation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5

Zegarra, A., and Sabanovic, S. (2017). Cross-Functional Team in a Project with an Agile Management: Effective Strategies and Common Challenges in a Cross-Functional Team While Using Agile Project Management.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

How to Cite

Dirani, M. A. (2026). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: EVALUATING TOOLS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVES. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 13(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v6.i13.2026.1745