PREDICTING MACHINE FAILURES AND SYSTEM SECURITY USING MACHINE LEARNING AND DEEP LEARNING ALGORITHMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v12.i12.2025.1722Keywords:
Machine, Failures, System, Security, Deep Learning, AlgorithmsAbstract
The term “Internet of Things” (IoT) refers to a system of networked computing devices that may work and communicate with one another without direct human intervention. It is one of the most exciting areas of computing nowadays, with its applications in multiple sectors like cities, homes, wearable equipment, mobile system, critical infrastructure, hospitals, and transportation. The security issues surrounding IoT devices increase as they expand. To address these issues, this study presents a novel model for enhancing the security of IoT systems using machine learning (ML) classifiers. The proposed approach analyzes recent technologies, security, intelligent solutions, and vulnerabilities in ML IoT-based intelligent systems as an essential technology to improve IoT security. The study illustrates the benefits and limitations of applying ML in an IoT environment and provides a security model based on ML that manages autonomously the rising number of security issues related to the IoT domain. The paper proposes an ML-based security model that autonomously handles the growing number of security issues associated with the IoT domain. This research made a significant contribution by developing a cyberattack detection solution for IoT devices using ML. The study used seven ML algorithms to identify the most accurate classifiers for their AI-based reaction agent’s implementation phase, which can identify attack activities and patterns in networks connected to the IoT. The study used seven ML algorithms to identify the most accurate classifiers for their AI-based reaction agent’s implementation phase, which can identify attack activities and patterns in networks connected to the IoT. Compared to previous research, the proposed approach achieved a 99.9% accuracy, a 99.8% detection average, a 99.9 F1 score, and a perfect AUC score of 1. The study highlights that the proposed approach outperforms earlier machine learning-based models in terms of both execution speed and accuracy. The study illustrates that the suggested approach outperforms previous machine learning-based models in both execution time and accuracy. Industry 4.0 emphasizes real-time data analysis for understanding and optimizing physical processes. This study leverages a Predictive Maintenance Dataset from the UCI repository to predict machine failures and categorize them. This study covers two objectives namely, to compare the performance of machine learning algorithms in classifying machine failures, and to assess the effectiveness of deep learning techniques for improved prediction accuracy. The study explores various machine learning algorithms and finds the XG Boost Classifier to be the most effective among them. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), a deep learning algorithm, demonstrates its superior accuracy in predicting machine failures compared to both traditional machine learning and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The novelty of this study is the application and comparison of machine learning and deep learning models to an unbalanced dataset. Findings of this study hold significant implications for industrial management and research. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of machine learning and deep learning algorithms in predictive maintenance, enabling proactive maintenance interventions and resource optimization.
Downloads
References
Adhikari, P., Rao, H. G., and Buderath, M. (2018). Machine Learning-Based Data Driven Diagnostics and Prognostics Framework for Aircraft Predictive Maintenance. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace (24–26). Dresden, Germany.
Arena, S., Florian, E., Zennaro, I., Orrù, P. F., and Sgarbossa, F. (2022). A Novel Decision Support System for Managing Predictive Maintenance Strategies Based on Machine Learning Approaches. Safety Science, 146, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105529
Balogh, Z., Gatial, E., Barbosa, J., Leitão, P., and Matejka, T. (2018). Reference Architecture for a Collaborative Predictive Platform for Smart Maintenance In Manufacturing. In 22nd International Conference On Intelligent Engineering Systems (Ines) (Pp. 299–304). Ieee. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Ines.2018.8523969
Bousdekis, A., Mentzas, G., Hribernik, K., Lewandowski, M., von Stietencron, M., and Thoben, K.-D. (2019). A unified architecture for proactive maintenance in manufacturing enterprises. In Enterprise Interoperability VIII (307–317). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13693-2_26
Boyes, H., Hallaq, B., Cunningham, J., and Watson, T. (2018). The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT): An Analysis Framework. Computers in Industry, 101, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.04.015
Carbery, C. M., Woods, R., and Marshall, A. H. (2018). A Bayesian Network-Based Learning System For Modelling Faults In Large-Scale Manufacturing. In Ieee International Conference On Industrial Technology (Icit) (1357–1362). Ieee. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Icit.2018.8352377
Da Cunha Mattos, T., Santoro, F. M., Revoredo, K., and Nunes, V. T. (2014). A Formal Representation for Context-Aware Business Processes. Computers In Industry, 65(8), 1193–1214. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compind.2014.07.005
Ding, S. H., and Kamaruddin, S. (2015). Maintenance Policy Optimization—Literature Review and Directions. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76, 1263–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6341-2
Ferreira, L. L., Albano, M., Silva, J., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., Di Orio, G., and Ferreira, H. (2017). A Pilot for Proactive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. In 2017 IEEE 13th International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS) (1–9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS.2017.7991952
Hesser, D. F., and Markert, B. (2019).
Jeong, I. J., Leon, V. J., and Villalobos, J. R. (2007). Integrated Decision-Support System for Diagnosis, Maintenance Planning, and Scheduling of Manufacturing Systems. International Journal of Production Research, 45(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600678896
Kaushik, A., and Yadav, D. K. (2023). Analysing Failure Prediction for a Manufacturing Firm Using Machine Learning Algorithms. In Advanced Engineering Optimization Through Intelligent Techniques: Select Proceedings of AEOTIT 2022 (pp. 457–463). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9285-8_44
Kunst, R., Avila, L., Binotto, A., Pignaton, E., Bampi, S., and Rochol, J. (2019). Improving Devices Communication in Industry 4.0 Wireless Networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 83, 1–12.
Lewis, S. A., and Edwards, T. G. (1997). Smart Sensors and System Health Management Tools for Avionics and Mechanical Systems. In 16th DASC. AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Reflections to the Future. Proceedings 2 (8-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.1997.637283
Liu, Z., Jin, C., Jin, W., Lee, J., Zhang, Z., Peng, C., and Xu, G. (2018). Industrial AI Enabled Prognostics for High-Speed Railway Systems. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM) (1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHM.2018.8448431
O’Donovan, P., Gallagher, C., Leahy, K., and O’Sullivan, D. T. (2019). A Comparison of Fog and Cloud Computing Cyber-Physical Interfaces for Industry 4.0 Real-Time Embedded Machine Learning Engineering Applications. Computers in Industry, 110, 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.016
Romeo, L., Loncarski, J., Paolanti, M., Bocchini, G., Mancini, A., and Frontoni, E. (2020). Machine Learning-Based Design Support System for the Prediction of Heterogeneous Machine Parameters in Industry 4.0. Expert Systems with Applications, 140, 112869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112869
Schmidt, B., and Wang, L. (2018). Cloud-Enhanced Predictive Maintenance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 99, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8983-8
Schmidt, B., and Wang, L. (2018). Predictive Maintenance of Machine Tool Linear Axes: A Case from Manufacturing Industry. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.022
Susto, G. A., and Beghi, A. (2016). Dealing with Time-Series Data in Predictive Maintenance Problems. In 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) (1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2016.7733659
Tessoni, V., and Amoretti, M. (2022). Advanced Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Multi-Step Multivariate Time Series Forecasting in Predictive Maintenance. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 748–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.273
Ucar, A., Karakose, M., and Kırımça, N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends. Applied Sciences, 14(2), 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020898
Vollert, S., Atzmueller, M., and Theissler, A. (2021). Interpretable Machine Learning: A Brief Survey from the Predictive Maintenance Perspective. In 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) (1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA45728.2021.9613467
Wang, K., and Wang, Y. (2017). How AI Affects the Future Predictive Maintenance: A Primer of Deep Learning. In International Workshop of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation 32 (1–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5768-7_1
Xu, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, X., and Zheng, Y. (2018). A Digital-Twin-Assisted Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Transfer Learning. IEEE Access, 7, 990–999. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2890566
Zhou, C., and Tham, C. K. (2018). Graphel: A Graph-Based Ensemble Learning Method for Distributed Diagnostics and Prognostics in the Industrial Internet of Things. In 2018 IEEE 24th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS) (903–909). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PADSW.2018.8644943
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ambreena Muneer, Dr. Vineet Mehan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- That its release has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
For More info, please visit CopyRight Section
