ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AS A BASIS FOR CLIMATE ADAPTATION INDICATORS: A CASE FROM URBAN INDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v12.i10.2025.1687Keywords:
Ecosystem Services, Climate Adaptation, Urban Resilience, Adaptation Indicators, Sustainable Planning, Ecosystem-Based AdaptationAbstract
Climate change poses significant threats to urban sustainability, particularly in rapidly growing cities where ecological degradation amplifies vulnerability to extreme weather events. Ecosystem services (ES)—the benefits derived from natural systems—offer a vital framework for developing climate adaptation strategies by linking ecological functions with human well-being. This study explores how ecosystem services can serve as a basis for identifying and evaluating climate adaptation indicators. Through an integrative review of literature and case-based analysis, the research highlights the role of provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting services in enhancing adaptive capacity. The final set of indicators was established following a comprehensive data collection process involving surveys and questionnaires administered to key stakeholders. These stakeholders comprised professionals from relevant fields, specifically urban planners, policy makers, architects, urbanists, urban designers, urban foresters, and individuals engaged in the urban infrastructure sector." Indicators such as urban green cover, water retention potential, biodiversity index, carbon sequestration, and social access to green infrastructure are identified as measurable parameters for adaptation assessment. The findings emphasize that embedding ecosystem service-based indicators within urban planning can improve resilience, promote sustainable land-use management, and support evidence-based policy formulation. By positioning ecosystem services at the core of adaptation frameworks, cities can transition from reactive to proactive climate governance that synergizes ecological health with socio-economic sustainability.
Downloads
References
Andersson, E., Barthel, S., Borgström, S., et al. (2014). Reconnecting Cities to the Biosphere: Stewardship of Green Infrastructure and Urban Ecosystem Services. AMBIO, 43(4), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buizer, M., Elands, B., & Vierikko, K. (2016). Governing Cities Reflexively—The Biocultural Diversity Concept as an Alternative to Ecosystem Services. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.003
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Dang, A. N., Jackson, B. M., Benavidez, R., & Tomscha, S. A. (2021). Review of Ecosystem Service Assessments: Pathways for Policy Integration in Southeast Asia. Ecosystem Services, 49, 101266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101266
Elmqvist, T., Setälä, H., Handel, S. N., van der Ploeg, S., Aronson, J., Blignaut, J. N., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Nowak, D. J., Kronenberg, J., & de Groot, R. (2015). Benefits of Restoring Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001
Ernstson, H., & Sörlin, S. (2013). Ecosystem Services as Technology of Globalization: On Articulating Values in Urban Nature. Ecological Economics, 86, 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.012
Evers, C. R., Wardropper, C. B., Branoff, B., Granek, E. F., Hirsch, S. L., Link, T. E., Olivero-Lora, S., & Wilson, C. (2018). The Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity of Novel Ecosystems: A Literature Review. Global Ecology and Conservation, 13, e00362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.e00362
Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013). Classifying and Valuing Ecosystem Services for Urban Planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., Kabisch, N., Kremer, P., Langemeyer, J., Rall, E., McPhearson, T., Pauleit, S., Qureshi, S., Schwarz, N., Voigt, A., & Elmqvist, T. (2014). A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation. AMBIO, 43(4), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Pauleit, S., Naumann, S., Davis, M., Artmann, M., Haase, D., Knapp, S., Korn, H., Stadler, J., Zaunberger, K., & Bonn, A. (2016). Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Urban Areas: Perspectives on Indicators, Knowledge Gaps, Barriers, and Opportunities for action. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239
McPhearson, T., Pickett, S. T. A., Grimm, N., Niemelä, J., Alberti, M., Elmqvist, T., Weber, C., Haase, D., Breuste, J., & Qureshi, S. (2016). Advancing Urban Ecology Toward a Science of Cities. BioScience, 66(3), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw002
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press.
Munang, R., Thiaw, I., Alverson, K., Liu, J., & Han, Z. (2013). The Role of Ecosystem Services in Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.02.002
Nagendra, H., Bai, X., Brondízio, E., & Lwasa, S. (2018). The Urban South and the Predicament of Global Sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 1(7), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0101-5
Pandey, R., Alatalo, J. M., Thapliyal, K., Chauhan, S., Archie, K. M., Gupta, A. K., Jha, S. K., & Kumar, M. (2018). Climate Change Vulnerability in Urban Slum Communities: Investigating Household Adaptation and Decision-Making Capacity in the Indian Himalaya. Ecological Indicators, 90, 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.031
Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P., Breil, M., Nita, M. R., Geneletti, D., & Calfapietra, C. (2017). A Framework for Assessing and Implementing the Co-Benefits of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D., Aragón-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R., Pelling, M., Roberts, D., & Solecki, W. (2014). Urban Areas. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects (pp. 535–612). Cambridge University Press.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Sharma, D., & Tomar, S. (2010). Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation in Indian Cities. Environment and Urbanization, 22(2), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247810377390
Singh, C., Madhavan, M., Arvind, J., & Bazaz, A. (2021). Climate Change Adaptation in Indian cities: A Review of Existing Actions and Spaces for Triple Wins. Urban Climate, 36, 100783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100783
Singh, J., Karmakar, S., PaiMazumder, D., Ghosh, S., & Niyogi, D. (2020). Climate Change Impacts on Urban Flooding: A Case Study of Indian Cities. Environmental Research Letters, 15(7), 074033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8980
Singh, K., Singh, R., & Tewari, S. (2021). Ecosystem Restoration: Challenges and Opportunities for India. Restoration Ecology, 29(5), e13341. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13341
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ar. Shaila Naaz, Dr. Nirmita Mehrotra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- That its release has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
For More info, please visit CopyRight Section
