THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION CAPABILITIES ON NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF BUSINESS REFERENCE

Authors

  • Ha Chang Su Department of Industrial Management, Gyeongsang National University
  • Oh Jaesin Department of Industrial Management, Gyeongsang National University, 501, Jinju-daero, jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v12.i4.2025.1538

Keywords:

Technology Commercialization Capabilities, New Product Development, Business Performance, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Business Age Moderation

Abstract

In the Fourth Industrial Revolution era, companies face unprecedented competition and market uncertainty, necessitating effective technology commercialization for survival. This study examines how technology commercialization capabilities influence new product development and business performance, particularly investigating business age as a moderating factor. The research analyzed data from 427 Fourth Industrial Revolution manufacturing companies using structural equation modeling, examining relationships between four technology commercialization capabilities (research, absorption, marketing, and manufacturing), new product development, and performance outcomes. Results demonstrated that research, absorption, and manufacturing capabilities significantly impact new product development, with manufacturing capability exhibiting the strongest influence. New product development showed positive effects on both financial and non-financial performance metrics. Notably, business age emerged as a crucial moderator in the relationship between technology commercialization capabilities and new product development. Companies with longer histories displayed stronger effects of research capabilities, while manufacturing and absorption capabilities proved effective regardless of organizational age. These findings enhance our understanding of how different technology commercialization capabilities contribute to business success across various organizational life stages, offering valuable insights for companies aiming to optimize their technology commercialization strategies in an increasingly competitive market environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities and multinational Enterprise: Penrosean Insights and Omissions. Management International Review, 47 (2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812834478_0004

Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of "Organizational Lag." Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (3), performance: The problem of "organizational lag". Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3),2

Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(4), 453-462

Heo, S. Y., & Seol, S. S. (2005). Development of Technology Commercialization Performance Indicators for Technology-Innovative SMEs. Journal of Technology Innovation, 8 (1), 85-104.

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(1), 3-10.

Jeon, I. O., & Ahn, W. S. (2016). A Study on the Impact of Technological Innovation Capability on Business Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11 (2), 68-79.

Jung, G. I. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Technology Commercialization Performance. Journal of Technology Innovation Research, 27 (4), 1-33.

Lilien, G. L., & Yoon, E. (1989). Determinants of New Industrial Product Performance: A Strategic Reexamination of the Empirical Literature. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36 (1), 3-10.

Medium-sized Enterprises. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 68-79.

Rochford, L. (1991). Generating and Screening New Product Ideas. Industrial Marketing Management, 20 (4), 287-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-8501(91)90003-X

SMEs. Journal of Technology Innovation, 8(1), 85-104.

Swamidass, P. M., & Newell, W. T. (1987). Manufacturing Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance: A Path Analytic Model. Management Science, 33 (4), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.4.509

Van der Panne, G., & Dolfsma, W. (2003). The Odd Role of Proximity in Knowledge Relations: High-Tech in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94 (4), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00273

Zirger, B. J., & Maidique, M. A. (1990). A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test. Management Science, 36 (7), 867-883. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.7.867

Downloads

Published

2025-04-17

How to Cite

Su, H. C., & Jaesin, O. (2025). THE EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION CAPABILITIES ON NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF BUSINESS REFERENCE. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 12(4), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v12.i4.2025.1538