PERCEIVED LEGITIMACY OF INSIDER VS. OUTSIDER SUCCESSORS AND ITS IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE IN THE ACCRA METROPOLIS

Authors

  • Abdul Jalil Mahama Alhassan Iddrisu Zaapayim NIBS University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v12.i1.2025.1522

Keywords:

Succession Planning, Perceived Legitimacy, Insider Successors, Outsider Successors, Organizational Performance, Upper Echelons Theory, Leadership Transitions

Abstract

Succession planning is a critical process for ensuring organizational continuity and performance, with the selection of insider or outsider successors playing a pivotal role. This study examines the perceived legitimacy of insider versus outsider successors and their impact on organizational performance within the Accra metropolis. Using the upper echelons theory as a framework, the study employed a quantitative research design with a sample size of 300 participants, comprising employees and stakeholders from organizations that had undergone leadership transitions within the last three years. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques, including correlation and regression analyses. The findings revealed a strong positive relationship between perceived legitimacy and organizational performance, with perceived legitimacy accounting for 90.9% of the variance in performance outcomes. Insider successors were viewed as fostering continuity and alignment with organizational culture, while outsider successors were associated with innovation and strategic change. These results highlight the importance of transparent and credible selection processes in leadership transitions. The study underscores the relevance of the upper echelons theory in understanding leadership dynamics and provides practical recommendations for improving organizational outcomes through effective succession planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Connelly, B. L., Shi, W., Walker, H. J., & Hersel, M. C. (2022). Searching for a sign: CEO Successor Selection in the Wake of Corporate Misconduct. Journal of Management, 48(4), 1035-1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320924119

Gabriel, P. I., Biriowu, C. S., & Dagogo, E. L.-J. (2020). Examining Succession and Replacement Planning in Work Organizations. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.2.192

Georgakakis, D., & Buyl, T. (2020). Guardians of the Previous Regime: Post-CEO Succession Factional Subgroups and Firm Performance. Long Range Planning, 53(3), 101971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101971

Giambatista, R. C. (2004). Jumping Through Hoops: A Longitudinal Study of Leader Life Cycles in the NBA. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 607-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.002

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434

Janani, S., Christopher, R. M., Nikolov, A. N., & Wiles, M. A. (2022). Marketing Experience of CEOs and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(3), 460-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00824-9

Karaevli, A. (2007). Performance Consequences of new CEO 'Outsiderness': Moderating Effects of Pre‐and Post‐Succession Contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 28(7), 681-706. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.589

Kim, C., Park, J.-H., Kim, J., & Lee, Y. (2022). The Shadow of a Departing CEO: Outsider Succession and Strategic Change in a Business Group. Asia Pacific Business Review, 28(1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1968655

Kim, Y., Jeong, S. S., Yiu, D. W., & Moon, J. (2021). Frequent CEO Turnover and Firm Performance: the Resilience Effect of Workforce Diversity. Journal of Business Ethics, 173, 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04534-0

Leker, J., & Salomo, S. (2000). CEO Turnover and Corporate Performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 16(3), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(99)00023-8

Liu, X., & Atinc, G. (2021). CEO Selection, Reference Setting, and Postsuccession Strategic Change. Management Decision, 59(2), 258-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1299

Ma, S., Kor, Y. Y., & Seidl, D. (2022). Top Management Team Role Structure: A Vantage Point for Advancing Upper Echelons Research. Strategic Management Journal, 43(8), O1-O28. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3368

Marshall, J. D., Aguinis, H., & Beltran, J. R. (2024). Theories of Performance: A Review and Integration. Academy of Management Annals, ja, annals-2022. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2022.0049

Neely Jr, B. H., Lovelace, J. B., Cowen, A. P., & Hiller, N. J. (2020). Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029-1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908640

Siambi, J. K. (2022). Leadership Succession Planning and Organization Transition: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 10(3), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.1003003

Turner, K., Adwokat, D. M., & Prescott, R. K. (2022). Recruiting a Successor from Inside, Outside, or Utilizing Other Options for the Organization. In Succession Planning for Small and Family Businesses (pp. 47-72). Productivity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003281054-5

Wang, G., Holmes Jr, R. M., Oh, I., & Zhu, W. (2016). Do CEOs Matter to Firm Strategic Actions and Firm Performance? A Meta‐Analytic Investigation Based on Upper Echelons Theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), 775-862. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12140

Whitler, K. A., Lee, B., Krause, R., & Morgan, N. A. (2021). Upper Echelons Research in Marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 198-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00724-4

Yamak, S., Nielsen, S., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2014). The Role of External Environment in Upper Echelons theory: A Review of Existing Literature and Future Research Directions. Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 69-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113511663

Yeh, Y.-H., & Liao, C.-C. (2021). Are Non-Family Successors all the Same? Inside-Promoted vs. Outside-Sourced. Journal of Corporate Finance, 71, 102122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102122

Zhu, Q., Hu, S., & Shen, W. (2020). Why do Some Insider CEOs Make More Strategic Changes than Others? The Impact of Prior Board Experience on New CEO Insiderness. Strategic Management Journal, 41(10), 1933-1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3183

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

Mahama Alhassan Iddrisu Zaapayim, A. J. (2025). PERCEIVED LEGITIMACY OF INSIDER VS. OUTSIDER SUCCESSORS AND ITS IMPACT ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE IN THE ACCRA METROPOLIS. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v12.i1.2025.1522