EDUCATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING THROUGH JOURNALS PUBLICATIONS: THE RELATION BETWEEN THE PUBLICATION TIME AND ITS REGIONAL RANKINGS

Authors

  • Oluwasegun V. Emmanuel M.Sc., Department of Materials Engineering and Construction Processes, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v10.i8.2023.1358

Keywords:

Article, Average Duration, Education, Impact Factor, Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Research, Points, Source Normalized Impact Per Paper

Abstract

The fast and quality dissemination of research breakthroughs via journals is essential to the researchers. Hence, this study analyzed the average duration for Civil Engineering journals based on the points allocations in Poland’s Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MEiN) list. A total of 30 journals were randomly selected and grouped based on the regional points allocation. The date of submission to the date of acceptance (SA) and the date of acceptance to the date of publication (SP) were extracted from 3557 articles. Version 26 IBM Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze the average duration for the dataset. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was used for the analysis of the relationship between the points allocation and the Scopus impact factors (IF), Web of Science impact factors (WoS IF), source normalized impact per paper (SNIP), SA, and SP. The results show that the average duration SA and SP for journals with 200, 140, and 100 points within the 5 years are 305.28, 285.25, 317.93 days, respectively, while for journals with 70, 40, and 20 points, the average duration is 180.50, 324.60, 206.41 days. Further analysis shows a statistically significant difference between the Scopus IF, WoS IF, SNIP, and allocated points. They indicate that these journal metrics affect journal categorization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Björk, B. C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The Publishing Delay in Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001

Chakrabarti, S. K. (2016). Industry Interface in Undergraduate Civil Engineering Education : Indian Context. Procedia Engineering, 161, 1982–1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.790

Chen, H., Chen, C.H., & Vishal, J. (2013). Publication Times, Impact Factors, and Advance Online Publication in Ophthalmology Journals. Ophthalmology., 120(8), 1697-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.01.044

De Bronstein, A. A., Lampe, S., & Halberstadt, J. (2023). Fostering Future Engineers as Transformational Agents : Integrating Sustainability and Entrepreneurship in Engineering Education. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 957–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.372

Dong, P., Loh, M., & Mondry, A. (2006). Publication Lag in Biomedical Journals Varies Due to the Periodical’S Publishing Model. Scientometrics, 69(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0148-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0148-3

Edward J. Huth. (1999). Writing and Publishing in Medicine. (3rd ed.). Williams & Wilkins.

Elsevier. (2023a). Measuring a Journal’S Impact.

Elsevier. (2023b). What is Peer Review ?

Gamayunova, O. (2015). The Role of Civil Engineering Institute in Increasing the International Competitiveness of the St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University. Procedia Engineering, 117(1), 1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.237

Haustein, S. (2012). Multidimensional Journal Evaluation : Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factor. De Gruyter Saur. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255553

Jubb, M. (2016). Peer Review : The Current Landscape and Future Trends. Learned Publishing, 29(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1008

Kelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., & Adeli, K. (2014). Peer Review in Scientific Publications : Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. EJIFCC, 25(3), 227–243.

Marshall, J., & Berland, L. (2012). Developing a Vision of Pre-College Engineering Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(2), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314869

Mayden, K. D. (2012). Peer Review: Publication’s Gold Standard. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 3(2), 117–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2012.3.2.8

Miller, K. A., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2020). The Influence of Student Enrollment in Pre-College Engineering Courses on their Interest in Engineering Careers. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 10(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1235

Mohanty, C. R., Bellapukonda, S., Mund, M., Behera, B. K., & Sahoo, S. S. (2021). Analysis of Publication Speed of Anesthesiology Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition), 71(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.025

Moos, D. D. (2011). The Review Process : What Is It ? Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, 26(1), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2010.11.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2010.11.006

Mulligan, A. (2005). Is Peer Review in Crisis ? Oral Oncology, 41(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.11.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.11.001

Rogers, S.W., & Goktas, R. K. (2010). Exploring Engineering Graduate Student Research Proficiency with Student Surveys. Journal of Engineering Education, 99, 263–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01061.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01061.x

Sampaio, A. Z., Ferreira, M. M., Rosário, D. P., & Martins, O. P. (2010). 3D and VR Models in Civil Engineering Education : Construction, Rehabilitation and Maintenance. Automation in Construction, 19(7), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.05.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.05.006

Sebo, P., Fournier, J. P., Ragot, C., Gorioux, P. H., Herrmann, F. R., & Maisonneuve, H. (2019). Factors Associated with Publication Speed in General Medical Journals : A Retrospective Study of Bibliometric Data. Scientometrics, 119(2), 1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03061-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03061-8

Sigahi, T. F. A. C., & Sznelwar, L. I. (2023). From Isolated Actions to Systemic Transformations : Exploring Innovative Initiatives on Engineering Education for Sustainable Development in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384(December 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135659

Spier, R. (2002). The History of the Peer-Review Process. Trends in Biotechnology, 20(8), 357–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01985-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01985-6

Taşkın, Z., Taşkın, A., Doğan, G., & Kulczycki, E. (2022). Factors Affecting Time to Publication in Information Science. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7499–7515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04296-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04296-8

The Guardian, “Peer Review, Preprints and the Speed of u”. (Accessed : 8th January, 2023).

Zhao, S., Zhang, H., & Wang, J. (2018). Cognition and System Construction of Civil Engineering Innovation and Entrepreneurship System in Emerging Engineering Education. Cognitive Systems Research, 52, 1020–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.020

Downloads

Published

2023-09-04

How to Cite

Emmanuel, O. V. (2023). EDUCATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING THROUGH JOURNALS PUBLICATIONS: THE RELATION BETWEEN THE PUBLICATION TIME AND ITS REGIONAL RANKINGS. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 10(8), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v10.i8.2023.1358