• Sherry K. Amedorme Department of Mechanical and Automotive Technology, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Kumasi-Ghana
  • NR.N. Roselina Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam Selangor Malaysia



Pressure Atomizer Swirl, Atomization Model, Sauter Mean Diameter (Smd), Validation


In many combustion and agricultural applications atomizers are used to increase the surface area of the liquid to ensure high rates of mixing and improve evaporation. The most common, simple, and reliable atomizer is the pressure swirl atomizer. This atomizer is said to have quality and effective atomization compared to others and induces swirling motion to the liquid and gives a hollow cone spray with air core as it emerges from the exit orifice. To enhance the understanding and prediction of the atomizing characteristics various atomization models are used and need to be investigated experimentally. This paper presents a validation of the Σ−Yliq atomization model of two-phase flow in a pressure swirl atomizer using commercial CFD star-cd code and laser-diffraction based drop measurements. To obtain the best results for the droplet mean diameter between the prediction and the experiment in terms of turbulence different k-e models were evaluated. The results show that the computational predictions of Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) for the model have a good agreement with most of the experimental measurements in the radial positions when standard k-ɛ turbulence was used. However, more divergence was observed between the predictions and the experimental measurements when the RNG and Realizable k-ɛ turbulence models were used in the predictions. It was also observed that the model has good agreement with the mean droplet measurements on the spray centreline and radial axis with a percentage error of less than five percent.


Download data is not yet available.


Beheshti, N., Burluka, A. A., and Fairweather, M. (2007). Assessment of Σ− Y liq Model Predictions for Air-Assisted Atomisation. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 21, 381-397.

Belhadef, A., Vallet, A., Amielh, M., and Anselmet, F. (2012). Pressure-Swirl Atomization : Modeling and Experimental Approaches. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 39, 13-20.

Bishop, R. (1975). Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Theory of Two-Phase Flow. IOP Publishing.

Crowley, J. M., Wright, G. S., and Chato, J. C. (1990). Selecting a Working Fluid to Increase the Efficiency and Flow Rate of an EHD Pump. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 26(1), 42-49.

Cui, J., Lai, H., Li, J., and Ma, Y. (2017). Visualization of Internal Flow and the Effect of Orifice Geometry on the Characteristics of Spray and Flow Field in Pressure-Swirl Atomizers. Applied Thermal Engineering, 127, 812-822.

Dafsari, R. A., Lee, H. J., Han, J., Park, D. C., and Lee, J. (2019). Viscosity Effect on the Pressure Swirl Atomization of an Alternative Aviation Fuel. Fuel, 240, 179-191.

Dafsari, R. A., Vashahi, F., and Lee, J. (2017). Effect of Swirl Chamber Length on the Atomization Characteristics of a Pressure-Swirl Nozzle. Atomization and Sprays, 27(10), 859-874.

Drew, D. A. (1983). Mathematical Modeling of Two-Phase Flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 15, 261-291.

Emekwuru, N., and Watkins, A. P. (2010). Analysis of a Two-Fluid Sprayer and its Use to Develop the Number Size Distribution Moments Spray Model, Part II :Computational Analysis. Atomization and Sprays, 20(6), 467-484.

Gharbi, A., Ruffin, A., Anselmet, F., and Schiestel, R. (1996). Numerical Modelling of Variable Density Turbulent Jets. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 39(9), 1865-1882.

Hu, J., Liu, B., Zhang, C., Gao, H., Zhao, Z., Zhang, F., Wang, Y. (2019). Experimental Study on the Spray Characteristics of an Air-Assisted Fuel Injection System Using Kerosene and Gasoline. Fuel, 235, 782-794.

Khani Aminjan, K., Kundu, B., and Ganji, D. (2020). Study of Pressure Swirl Atomizer with Tangential Input at Design Point and Outside of Design Point. Physics of Fluids, 32(12), 127113.

Lefebvre, A. H., and McDonell, V. G. (2017). Atomization and Sprays. CRC press.

Lefebvre, A., and Wang, X. (1987). Mean Drop Sizes from Pressure-Swirl Nozzles. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 3(1), 11-18.

Lin, J., Qian, L., Xiong, H., and Chan, T. L. (2009). Effects of Operating Conditions on Droplet Deposition onto Surface of Atomization Impinging Spray. Surface and Coatings Technology, 203(12), 1733-174.

Liu, C., Liu, F., Yang, J., Mu, Y., Hu, C., and Xu, G. (2019). Experimental Investigations of Spray Generated by a Pressure Swirl Atomizer. Journal of the Energy Institute, 92(2), 210-221.

Liu, Z., Huang, Y., and Sun, L. (2017). Studies on Air Core Size in A Simplex Pressure-Swirl Atomizer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42, 18649-18657.

Malvern-Instruments (2007). Spraytec User Manual MAN0368. Issue.

Malý, M., Sapík, M., Jedelský, J., Janáčková, L., Jícha, M., Sláma, J., Wigley, G. (2018). Internal Flow Characteristics in Scaled Pressure-Swirl Atomizer. EPJ Web of Conferences. 02059.

Mirjalili, S., Jain, S. S., and Dodd, M. (2017). Interface-Capturing Methods for Two-Phase Flows : An Overview and Recent Developments. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs, 117-135.

Ortman, J., and Lefebvre, A. (1985). Fuel Distributions from Pressure-Swirl Atomizers. AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1(1), 11-15.

Rashad, M., Yong, H., and Zekun, Z. (2016). Effect of Geometric Parameters on Spray Characteristics of Pressure Swirl Atomizers. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(35), 15790-15799.

Shin, D., Bokhart, A. J., Rodrigues, N. S., Sojka, P., Gore, J. P., and Lucht, R. P. (2019). Experimental Study of Spray Characteristics at Cold Start and Elevated Ambient Pressure Using Hybrid Airblast Pressure-Swirl Atomizer. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, 1737.

Trask, N. A. (2010). Implementation of an Eulerian Atomization Model to Characterize Primary Spray Formation. Masters Theses, 434.

Vallet, A., Burluka, A.A., and Borghi, R. (2001). Development of a Eulerian Model for the "Atomization" of a Liquid Jet. Atomization and Sprays, 11(6).

Wimmer, E., and Brenn, G. (2012). Viscous Effects on Flows Through Pressure-Swirl Atomizers. In Proceedings of the 12th Triennial International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ICLASS 2012), Heidelberg, Germany. 2-6.

Wu, S., Gandhi, A., Li, H., and Meinhart, M. (2020). Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effects of Nozzle Taper Angle on Spray Characteristics of Gdi Multi-Hole Injectors at Cold Condition. Fuel, 275, 17888.

Xiong, H. B., Lin, J. Z., and Zhu, Z. F. (2009). Three-Dimensional Simulation of Effervescent Atomization Spray. Atomization and Sprays, 19(1), 75-90.

Yoon, S. H., Kim, D. K., and Kim, B. H. (2011). Effect of Nozzle Geometry for Swirl Type Twin-Fluid Water Mist Nozzle on the Spray Characteristic. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25, 1761.

Zhang, T., Dong, B., Chen, X., Qiu, Z., Jiang, R. and Li, W. (2017). Spray Characteristics of Pressure-Swirl Nozzles at Different Nozzle Diameters. Applied Thermal Engineering, 121, 984-991.




How to Cite

Amedorme, S. K., & Roselina, N. (2022). VALIDATION OF Σ−YLIQ ATOMIZATION MODEL IN PRESSURE SWIRL ATOMIZER. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 9(9), 53–66.