• Dr Sarfaraz Javed Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, Jahangirabad Institute of Technology, Barabanki, India



People, Organization, Performance, Customer Relationship, Software Technology, Organizational Behaviour


The study examines the effect of organizational behaviour on auditing firms’ performance. It investigates the influence of Software Technology and customer relationship management on financial performance of PwC, Deloitte and KPMG testing four hypotheses. The data was from secondary sources of financial reports and statements of PwC, Deloitte and KGPM (2011-2016) and Hypotheses were tested using multiple regression analysis and Pearson correlation. SPSS version 17 was used to perform the multiple regression analysis while Smart PLS version 3.2.6 was used to carry out SEM. The first hypothesis revealed that relatively customer relationship negatively predicted financial performance of PwC while software technology positively predicted the financial performance of PwC. Hypothesis two shows that customer relationship and software technology did not jointly and relatively predicted financial performance of Deloitte while in hypothesis three, customer relationship and software technology did not jointly predicted financial performance of KPMG and in hypothesis four, customer relationship management and software technology positively jointly influenced financial performance of both PwC and Deloitte. There have been few studies to made use of Structural Equation Model (SEM) to examine the organizational behaviour in the auditing firms. In this paper, SEM was used to test the effect of Software Technology and Cost on customer relationship on financial performance of the auditing firms. This paper contributes to the impact of organizational behaviour in the auditing firms.


Download data is not yet available.


Abu-Jarad, I.S., Yusof, N.A, & Nikbin, D. (2010). A Review Paper on Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Busines and Social Science, 1 (3), 26- 46.

Bacani, C. (2016): Deloitte vs. EY VS. KPMG VS. PWC: Anew world no.1 in accounting emerges, CFO Innovations, January, 28, 2016-15:14

Cook C. W. and Hunsaker, P.L. (2001) Management and Organizational Behaviour, Third edition. New York: McGraw Hills

Deloitte, 2016. Deloitte announces record revenue of US$36.8 billion

Devaraj, S., R. Kohli. 2000. Information technology payoff in the healthcare industry: A longitudinal study. Management Inform. Systems 16(4) 41–67.

Dewan, S., C. Min. 1997. The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Sci. 43(12) 1660–1675 DOI:

Forbes, 2016. "America's Largest Private Companies". Retrieved 6 August 2016

Griffiths, K. (2013). "Best 100 Companies". The Times. Archived from the original on 12 June 2011.

John G. dan A. M. Saks. Organizational Behaviour 7adn. Ontario: Peason Education Canada.2007, p. 203.

Jones, G.R., George, J.M. & Hill, and C.W.L. (2006) Contemporary Management (4th Edition).Boston: McGraw- Hill.

Lebans M, Euske K. (2006). A conceptual and operational delineation of performance. Business Performance Measurement, Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Lindgreen, A. (2004). The design, implementation and monitoring of a CRM programme: A case study, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 160-186

Mullins, L.J. (2010), “Management and Organisational Behaviour”, Pearson Education, 9th Edition.

Reinartz, W., Krafft, M., Hoyer, W.D.,(2004): The Customer Relationship Management

Process: Its Measurement and Impact on Performance, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.41, No.3, 2004, pp. 293– 305. DOI:

Sin, L.Y.M., Tse, A.C.B., & Yim, F.H.K. (2005). CRM conceptualization and scale development. European Journal of Marketing, 39(11/12), 1264–1290 DOI:

The Telegraph, (2017). Deloitte overtakes PwC as world's biggest accountant. Retrieved 15 Apr 2017




How to Cite

Javed, S. (2018). DOES ORGANISATION BEHAVIOUR AFFECT PERFORMANCE OF AUDITING FIRMS?. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 5(1), 90–98.