DYNAMICS-AKTION- PEDAGOGICAL DYNAMICS PROPOSAL, USEFUL FOR DESIGN STUDIO TEACHING AND BEYOND.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i1.2022.118Keywords:
Dynamic, Pedagogy, Design Studio Teaching, EvaluationAbstract [English]
This paper is a continuation and a complement to the previous paper: #eindakoa# (what we’ve done) A pedagogical method of Interior Design Projects’ method.
That paper developed a pedagogical method of design throughout a full course at a project Design Studio.
This paper extends that previous paper and develops its pedagogical approach through a series of pedagogical dynamics and strategies, defined on a more precise and detailed scale.
Each dynamic is artistically designed, almost like an action, to create a ‘learning event’ and teach the content of Design Studio through experience.
These dynamics are inspiring, to such an extent that they can be transferred to any discipline. However, this article includes a specific theoretical support: a discussion and a comparative contrast with different models of the pedagogical method of the architectural project Design Studio.
The first half of the dynamics are developed to enrich a conventional class, prior to the Covid- 19 pandemic. The second half of the dynamics are developed in response to the Covid-19 situation. They creatively exploit the possibilities of different platforms for online teaching.
Downloads
References
Anthony, K.H. (1987). Private Reactions to Public Criticism; Students, Faculty, and Practicing Architects State Their Views on Design Juries in Architectural Education. Journal of Architectural Education, 40(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1987.10758454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1987.10758454
Besa, E. (2015). Arquitecto, obra y método. Análisis comparado de diferentes estrategias metodológicas singulares de la creación arquitectónica contemporánea. Tesis Doctoral, ETSAM UPM. (It will be published by Nobuko publishers soon) http://oa.upm.es/38053/
Besa, E. (2019). #eindakoa# (lo que hemos hecho) Un MÉTODO pedagógico del MÉTODO de Proyectos de Diseño de Interior. EARI, Educación Artística Revista de Investigación, (10), 33-63. https://doi.org/10.7203/eari.10.13763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/eari.10.13763
Besa, E. (2021a). Arquitecto, obra y método: Kazuyo Sejima, Frank O. Gehry, Álvaro Siza, Rem Koolhaas, Peter Zumthor. Diseño Editorial. https://www.plataformaarquitectura.cl/cl/973568/arquitecto-obra-y-metodo-kazuyo-sejima-frank-o-gehry-alvaro-siza-rem-koolhaas-peter-zumthor
Besa, E. (2021b). dynamics-aktion. Propuesta de dinámicas pedagógicas, útiles en el Taller de Proyectos de diseño y más allá. EARI, Educación Artística Revista de Investigación, (12), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.7203/eari.12.17633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/eari.12.17633
Bose, M., Pennypacker, E. & Yahner, T. (2006). Enhancing critical thinking through 'independent decision-making' in the studio. Open House international, 31(3), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2006-B0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2006-B0005
Bravo, J.A.F. (2019). La sonrisa del conocimiento. Una metodología que escucha al que aprende para hablar al que enseña. Editorial CCS. https://www.amazon.com/SONRISA-DEL-CONOCIMIENTO-metodolog%C3%ADa-aprender/dp/849023941X
Ciravoğlu, A. (2014). Notes on architectural education: An experimental approach to design studio. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, (152), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.146
Cole, R. J. (1980). Teaching Experiments Integrating Theory and Design. Journal of Architectural Education, 34(2), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1980.10758644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1980.10758644
Cortés, J. A. & Moneo, R. (1976). Comentario sobre dibujos de 20 arquitectos actuales. Escuela Técnica Superior de Barcelona. https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/90472?locale-attribute=es
Dutton, T.A. (1987). Design and Studio Pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1424904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461
Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of Learning. Media, Architecture, Pedagogy. RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203020920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203020920
Fernando, N.A. (2007). Decision Making in Design Studios: Old Dilemmas and New Strategies. In SALAMA, A.N. and Wilkinson, N., (Eds), Design studio pedagogy: horizons for the future. The Urban International Press, 143-152. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327130052_Decision_Making_in_Design_Studios_Old_Dilemmas_and_New_Strategies
Frederickson, M.P. (1990). Design juries: A study in lines of communication. Journal of Architectural Education, 43(2), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1425031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1990.10758556
Freud, S. (1991) Tótem y tabú y otras obras (1913-1914) VIII. (J. L. Echeverry, Trad.) Amorrortu editors. (Original work published 1913-1914).
Friedman, K. (2003). Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods. Design Studies, 24(6), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00039-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00039-5
Hillier, B., Musgrove, J. & O'Sullivan, P. (1972). Knowledge and design. En MITCHELL, W. (ed.), Environmental design: Research and Practice. University of California at Los Angeles. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.468.9559&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Kellbaugh, D. (2004). Seven fallacies in architectural culture. Journal of Architectural Education, 58(1), 66-68. https://doi.org/10.1162/1046488041578167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/1046488041578167
Ledewitz, S. (1985). Models of Design in Studio Teaching. Journal of Architectural Education, 38(2), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1985.10758354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1985.10758354
Levinas, E. (1977). Totalidad e infinito. Ensayo sobre la exterioridad. (M. García Baró (Trad.) Ediciones Sígueme. (Original work published 1961).
Marmot, A. & Symes, M. (1985). The Social Context of Design: A Case Problem Approach. Journal of Architectural Education, 38(4), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.2307/1424860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1985.10758375
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l'invisible. Editions Gallimard. https://www.amazon.in/Visible-LInvisible-Merleau-Ponty/dp/2070286258
Ochsner, J.K. (2000). Behind the Mask: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Interaction in the Design Studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 53(4), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1162/104648800564608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/104648800564608
Philippou, S. (2001). On a Paradox in Design Studio Teaching or the Centrality of the Periphery. In Proceedings of Architectural Educators: Responding to Change At: Architectural Education Exchange, Centre for Education in the Built Environment (CEBE), Cardiff University. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237327294_ON_A_PARADOX_IN_DESIGN_STUDIO_TEACHING_OR_THE_CENTRALITY_OF_THE_PERIPHERY
Robinson, J. W. & Weeks, J. S. (1983). Programming as a Design. Journal of Architectural Education, 37(2), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1983.10758326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1983.10758326
Salama, A. M. (2015). Spatial Design Education. New Directions for Pedagogy in Architecture and Beyond. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315610276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315610276
Schön, D.A. (1984). The architectural Studio as an Exemplar of Education for Reflection-in-Action. Journal of Architectural Education, 38(1), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1984.10758345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1984.10758345
Simmons, G. (1978). Analogy in design: Studio teaching models. Journal of Architectural Education, 31(3), 18-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1978.10758137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1978.10758137
Vega, E. (2019). De Weimar a Ulm. Mito y realidad de la Bauhaus 1919-1972. Experimenta Editorial. https://www.amazon.in/Weimar-Ulm-realidad-Bauhaus-1919-1972-ebook/dp/B08LNJKTVS
hooks, b. (2021). Enseñar a transgredir. La educación como práctica de la libertad. (M. Malo, Trad.) Capitán Swing Libros. (Original work published 1994). https://capitanswing.com/libros/ensenar-a-transgredir/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Eneko Besa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
