WHY THEATRE? PERSPECTIVES FROM INDIAN THEATRE ARTISTES IN THE CONTEXT OF NĀṬYAŚĀSTRA

Authors

  • Vishakha Rajurkar Raj Research Scholar, Department of Mass Communication, Central University of Jharkhand, Brambe, Ranchi-835205, Jharkhand, India
  • Dev Vrat Singh Professor, Department of Mass Communication, Central University of Jharkhand, Brambe, Ranchi- 835205 Jharkhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.847

Keywords:

Nāṭyaśāstra, Contemporary Theatre Practice, Theatre Communication

Abstract [English]

Nāṭyaśāstra is an Indian ancient Sanskrit text on dramaturgy written by Āchārya Bhartmuni in the 5th century. The story of the origin, development, and evolution of Nāṭyaśāstra is described in the very first chapter of the text. It also reveals the emergence of theatre practice. According to Nāṭyaśāstra, theatre serves the purpose of entertaining as well as educating its audiences. This paper aims to examine the contemporary theatre practice on the principle of Nāṭyaśāstra in this context. The objective of the present research paper is to study the motivation, inspiration, and purpose of contemporary theatre practitioners under the light of the purpose of theatre according to Nāṭyaśāstra.
The present research is qualitative. The methodology employed for data collection is the interview of 46 theatre practitioners using semi-structured interviews. The data has been collected from prominent theatre festivals held in five different North Indian cities namely Delhi, Bhopal, Jaipur, Lucknow, and Patna. The analysis of the interviews is done using thematic analysis.
The findings of the research show that contemporary theatre practitioners have personal aspirations as well as social obligations to practising theatre. Contemporary theatre practitioners also believe that theatre is a medium of entertainment as well as sensitizing people which aligns with the principle of Nāṭyaśāstra.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhikary, N. M. (2010). Sahridayata in Communication. Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(1), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v4i1.5816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v4i1.5816

Adhikary, N. M. (2008). The Sadharanikaran Model and Aristotle’s Model of Communication: A Comparative Study. Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v2i1.2877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v2i1.2877

Adhikary, N. M. (2014). Theory and Practice of Communication–Bharata Muni. Bhopal: Makhanlal Chaturvedi National University of Journalism and Communication.

Bhattacharyya, K. K., & Dasgupta, D. (2013). Interpreting Theatre as a Communication Medium. Global Media Journal-Indian Edition, 4(2), 1–10.

Chattopadhyay, M. (2013). A Historical Study of Ancient Indian Theatre-Communication in the Light of Natyasastra. Global Media Journal: Indian Edition, 4(2).

Dissanayake, W. (2003). Asian Approaches to Human Communication: Retrospect and Prospect. Intercultural Communication Studies, 12(4), 17–38.

Ghosh, A. (2012). A History of the Jana Natya Manch: Plays for the People. SAGE Publications India.

Ghosh, M. (1950). The Natyasastra of Bharata Muni. Calcutta.

LohoChoudhury, B. (2014). Evidences of Communication from the Vedas and Natyaveda. Media and Communication: Practices and Issues, 70–79.

LohoChoudhury, B., & Bhattacharyya, K. K. (2014). Communication from Indian Perspective with Special Reference to Natyashastra. Dev Sanskriti: Interdisciplinary International Journal, 4, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.36018/dsiij.v4i0.46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36018/dsiij.v4i0.46

Mary, B. K., & Peeradina, S. (1989). Cultural Forces Shaping India. All India Association for Christian Higher Education.

Patnaik, S. (2008). Theatre and Education: A Different Interpretation of India. In Educatiing in Arts. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6387-9_22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6387-9_22

Reddi, U. V. (1985). Communication Theory: An Indian Perspective.

Shukla, B. (2014). Śribharatmunipraṇītam Sachitram Nāṭyaśastram. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan.

Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2002). A Theoretical Agenda for Entertainment—Education. Communication Theory, 12(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00262.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00262.x

Tanvir, H. (1974). Theatre is in the Villages. Social Scientist, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3516486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3516486

Tripathi, R. (2013). Saṁskrit Sāhitya Kā Abhinava Itihās (4th Ed.). Varanasi: Vishwavidyalaya Prakashan.

Ubersfeld, A., Bouillaguet, P., & Jose, C. (1982). The Pleasure of the Spectator. Modern Drama, 25(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.3138/md.25.1.127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mdr.1982.0052

Vatsyayan, K. (2007). Bharata: The Nāṭyaśāstra. Sahitya Akademi.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-06

How to Cite

Rajurkar Raj, V., & Singh, D. V. (2024). WHY THEATRE? PERSPECTIVES FROM INDIAN THEATRE ARTISTES IN THE CONTEXT OF NĀṬYAŚĀSTRA. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.847