LAW ENFORCEMENT POLICIES IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA

Yopi Gunawan

doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i3.2021.3798

Authors

Yopi Gunawan Faculty of Law, Universitas Singaperbangsa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i3.2021.3798

Keywords:

Law Enforcement, Policy, Corruption, Penal, Non-Penal

Abstract [English]

The law enforcement of corruption crimes that have been carried out so far only illustrates success in uncovering, arresting, detaining, prosecuting and convicted of the perpetrators who are found guilty. Still, it has not demonstrated success in eradicating corruption crimes widely. So that the success of such efforts creates a perception that Indonesia's corruption crimes are increasing, with this fact, what is illustrated is that Indonesia is a corrupt country. This is undoubtedly a contradiction with the expected goal of eradicating corruption crimes. The purpose of this article is to analyze corrupt law enforcement policies in Indonesia. This article concludes that amid national development efforts in various fields, the public's aspirations in eradicating corruption and any form are increasing because sin has caused enormous losses to the State, which could impact the emergence of crises in various fields. To overcome this, it is necessary to implement penal and non-penal policies to prevent criminal acts of corruption. Thus, the use of correctional and non-penal facilities must go hand in hand in overcoming corruption crimes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Dahwir, “Rekonstruksi Sanksi Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia (Punishment Oriented),” Lex Publica, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Asosiasi Pimpian Perguruan Tinggi Hukum Indonesia, vo. 6, pp. 655-667, November, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v6i1.4875

A. N. Marbun, “Suap di Sektor Privat: dapatkah Dijerat ?,” Integritas, Jurnal Anti Korupsi KPK, vol. 3, pp. 72-85, Maret, 2017.

A. Prakarsa and R. Yulia, “Model Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Sebagai Alternatif Memulihkan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, vol. 6, pp.31-44, Maret, 2017.

F. Santiago, “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Penegak hukum untuk Terciptanya Ketertiban Hukum,” Pagaruyuang Law Journal, vol. 1, pp. 33-46, July, 2017.

Ferguson, G. (2017). Global Corruption: Law, Theory, and Practice. International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy. Vancouver, BC, CA.

I. Masyitoh, “Dinamika Pelaksanaan Fungsi Legislasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Provinsi Dalam Penyelenggaran Pemerintahan Daerah,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Litigasi, vol. 10, pp. 102-117, Februari, 2009.

Januarsyah, Mas Putra Zenno et al. Corrective Justice: An Economic Approach for Law. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 208-215, feb. 2020.

L. Sarawati, “The Function of Ideal Law in Preparation Regulation Legislation in order to Creating Eqitable Regional Development.” Diponegoro Law Review, vol. 02, pp. 117-129, July, 2017.

M. K. Gunarto, and L. H. Analisa, “Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, vol. 13, pp. 37-49, Maret, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i1.690

Manacorda. (2014). Preventing Corporate Corruption: The Anti-Bribery Compliance Model, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Murphy, A.G. (2011). Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Practical Resource for Manager and Executives. Wiley. Hoboken, N.J.

Tarun, R.W. and P.P. Tomczak. (2019). The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Handbook: A Practical Guide for Multinational Counsel, Transactional Lawyers, and White-Collar Criminal Practitioners. American Bar Association. Lanham.

Xiao, Michael Yangming. “Deferred/Non-Prosecution Agreements: Effective Tools to Combat Corporate Crime”, Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol.23, No.233 (2013).

Yusuf, M. (2013). Merampas Aset Koruptor: Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kompas