MARRIAGE AGREEMENT FOR THE JOINT ASSETS IN MIXED COUPLE MARRIAGE ACCORDING IN INDONESIA BOOK OF CIVIL LAW NUMBER 1 OF 1974 POST DECISION OF THE COURT OF CONSTITUTION NUMBER 69/PUU-XIII/2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i1.2021.3119Keywords:
Mixed Marriage, Marriage Agreement, Joint PropertyAbstract [English]
This study aims to analyze the position of the Marriage Agreement for Joint Treasures in Mixed Marriage from three sides of the law, namely Civil Law, Law Number 1 of 1974, and Constitutional Court Decree Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015.
Hypothesis: Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 in line with Islamic law that prioritizes equal rights and obligations between husband and wife in terms of ownership of assets in marriage.
The method: used is normative (dogmatic) legal research, which is intended to find and formulate legal arguments, through analysis of the subject matter. While the approach used in this study there are 4 (four) types, namely: the statutory approach, comparative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach.
The results: of the study show that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 has provided a practical solution in overcoming the problems of a Marriage Agreement on Joint Assets: First, a marriage agreement can be made before, during and after the marriage is implemented. Second, ratification of a marriage agreement may be by a notary public, and effective from the date of the marriage agreement, and may be revoked. Third, marriage agreements are binding on third parties, especially related to the position of joint property in the marriage. This means that, Indonesian citizens have the right to joint property in a mixed marriage as long as the marriage agreement states that. The ruling is in line with Islamic law that prioritizes equal rights and obligations between husband and wife in terms of ownership of assets in a marriage.
Conclusion: The legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 on the status of joint property made a marriage agreement after marriage which began since the marriage took place followed by the status of shared property becomes separate if both parties wish in the agreement, as well as assets to be obtained in the future remain the property of each party, without having to obtain a court decision regarding the separation of assets. This ruling is in accordance with Islamic law which prioritizes equal rights and obligations between husband and wife in terms of ownership of assets in marriage.
Downloads
References
Abdurrahman. Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Akademika Presindo. 1995
Al-Hadi, Abu Azam. ”Perkawinan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam”, Jurnal Hukum Islam al-Qanun Vol. 2, Desember 2001, Fakultas Syari’ah IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, hal. 39-48
Al-Jabry, Abdul Manan Muhammad. Jarimatuz-zawaj Bighairil-Muslimat: Fiqhan wa Siyasatan. Terj. Achmad Syathori. ”Perkawinan Campuran Menurut Pandangan Islam”. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang. 1988
Alwesius, “Pembuatan Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”, http://alwesius.blogspot.com/2016/11/pembuatan-perjanjian-perkawinan-pasca.html, diakses 11 November 2018
Basyir, Ahmad Azhar. Hukum Perkawinan Islam. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 1997
Campbell, Enid, (et.all), 1996, Legal Research, Sidney; The Law Book Company, Ltd.
Damian Agata Yuvens, “Analisis Kritis terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015”, Artikel dalam Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 14, Nomor 4, Desember 2017, hal. 799-819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1445
Djazuli, A. Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah-Masalah yang Praktis, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2006
Do’i, Abdul Rahman I. Shari’ah The Islamic Law, Terj. Basri Iba Asghary dan Wadi Masturi, “Perkawinan dalam Syari’at Islam”, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1996
Eva Dwinopianti, “Implikasi dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan Setelah Kawin yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris”, artikel dalam jurnal Lex Renaisannce No. 1 Vol. 2 Januari 2017, hal. 16 - 34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol2.iss1.art2
Gautama, Sudargo. Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni. 1995
Hadjon, Philipus M. 1994, “Pengkajian Ilmu Hukum Dogmatik (Normatif)”, artikel dalam Jurnal Yuridika Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Vol. IX, No. 6, November-Desember 1994
Hadjon, Philipus M., dan Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, 2005, Argumentasi Hukum, Yogyakarta; Gadjah Mada University Press
Hasan, Djuhaedah. Hukum Keluarga Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Bandung: Armico. 1988
Hasan, M. Ali. Azas-azas Hukum Islam: Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja wali Press. 1997
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, “Dilema Penegakan Hukum Putusan MK No.69/PUU-XII/2015 (Persoalan Perkawinan Campuran Tanpa Perjanjian Kawin)”, artikel dalam Jurnal Notariil, Vol. 1, No. 2 Mei 2017, hal. 1-12
Idri.” Prosedur Pelaksanaan Perkawinan di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Islam al-Qanun Vol. 2, Desember 2001, Fakultas Syari’ah IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, hal. 27-37
Kaelany H.D., Islam dan Aspek-Aspek Kemasyarakatan, Bandung: Bumi Aksara, 1986
Kuzairi, Achmad. Nikah sebagai Perikatan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada. 1995
Mahdi, Sri Susilowati., Sjarif, Surini Ahlan dan Cahyono, Akhmad Budi. Hukum Perdata: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Gitama Jaya Jakarta. 2005
Manan, Abdul. Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana. 2008
Nuning Hallet, Mencermati Isi Rancangan UU Kewarganegaraan, http://www.mixedcouple.com, diakses 16 Juli 2009
Prawirohamidjojo, R. Soetojo. Pluralisme Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press. 2000
Prawirohamidjojo, R. Soetojo., dan Pohan, Marthalena. Hukum Orang dan Keluarga. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press. 2000
Putusan Mahkamah RI Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, tanggal 26 Oktober 2016 tentang Pengujian Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan terhadap UUD NRI 1945
Rofiq, Achmad. Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada. 1995
Salim H.S. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis [BW]. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2002
Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Internusa. 2000
Syaltut, Mahmud. Al-Islam Aqidah wa Syari’ah. Terj. Fachruddin dan Nasharuddin Thaha. Akidah dan Syari’ah Islam. Jakarta: Bina Aksara. 1984
Syarifuddin, Amir. Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia Antara Fiqh Munakahat dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Jakarta: Kencana. 2007
Titik Triwlan Tutik. Konstruksi Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pascaamandemen UUD 1945, Jakarta; Kencana Prenada Media Group. 2017
Titik Triwulan Tutik. Hukum Perdata dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. 2011
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.