EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF INDIA’S FOREIGN TRADE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH

Authors

  • Dr. Khujan Singh Haryana School of Business (Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology), Hisar-125001, Haryana, India. Mobile No.: +919466174057,
  • Dr. Anil Kumar Mittal School of Business (Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar), Delhi G.T. Road, Phagwara, Punjab-144411, India. Mobile No.: +918571092829 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7816-1256

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i10.2020.1805

Keywords:

Imports, Exports, Cointegration, Stationarity, Relationship, Granger Causality

Abstract [English]

The present study is an attempt to examine long run relationship among India’s GDP, Exports and Imports for which yearly time series data from 1995 to 2018 has been collected. Data for India’s GDP has been collected from RBI website and India’s export and import data has been collected form Ministry of Commerce and Industry website. The Augmented Dickey-Fuller unit root test for stationarity found that studied variables become stationary at first order of difference. While, Johnson cointegration test revealed long run cointegration between India’s GDP, exports and imports. The results of VECM Granger causality test exhibited bi-directional relationship between India’s GDP and India’s exports, whereas uni-directional relation has been found between India’s GDP and India’s imports. These results have significant implication for India’s export import policy and to achieve a target of $5 trillion economy till 2024-2025.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, S. (2012). Causality between exports and economic growth: Investigating suitable trade policy for Pakistan. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics,5 (10), 91-98.

Çevik, E. I., Atukeren, E., & Korkmaz, T. (2019). Trade openness and economic growth in Turkey: A rolling frequency domain analysis. Economies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, 7(2), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7020041

Chang, T., Simo-Kengne, B.D. & Gupta, R. (2014). The causal relationship between imports and economic growth in the nine provinces of South Africa: Evidence from panel granger causality tests. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development. 35 (2), 71-90.

Chiappini, R. (2011). FDI and trade: A Granger causality analysis in a heterogeneous panel. Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin,31 (4), 2975-2985.

Dritsakis, N. (2007). Exports and economic growth: An empirical investigation of E. U, U. S. A and Japan using causality tests. Retrieved online https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/700f/cfca5a86f8e73a1cb57f579c6360c63481b0.pdf

Eusuf, M. A. & Mansur, A. (2007). Causality between Export and Growth: Evidence from South Asian Countries.The Jahangir Nagar Economic Review, 19(1),73-86.

Gries, T. & Redlin, M. (2012). Trade openness and economic growth: A panel causality analysis. Working Papers CIE 52, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics. Retrieved online http://groups.uni-paderborn.de/fiwi/RePEc/Working%20Paper%20neutral/WP52%20-%202012-06.pdf

Guan, L. J., & Hong, Y. (2012). An empirical analysis on U.S. foreign trade and economic growth. AASRI Conference on Power and Energy Systems, 2 (2012), 39-43.

Herlitz, L. (1964). The concept of mercantilism, Scandinavian Economic History Review, 12:2, 101-120, DOI: 10.1080/03585522.1964.10407639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03585522.1964.10407639

Idris, J., Yusop, Z. &Habibullah, M.S. (2016). Trade openness and economic growth: A causality test in panel perspective.International Journal of Business and Society,17(2),281-290.

Khobai, H. & Mavikela, N. (2017). The causal linkage between trade openness and economic growth in Argentina: Evidence from the ARDL and VECM techniques. Working Papers 1712, Department of Economics, Nelson Mandela University, revised Oct 2017. Retrieved online http://repec.mandela.ac.za/RePEc/mnd/wpaper/paper.1712.pdf

Lawan, M.W. (2017). Cointegration and Causality between Exports and Economic Growth: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 8(14), 91-99.

Leo, M. &Zestos, G. K. (2004). Exports, imports and GDP growth: Causal relations in six European Union countries. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 1, 71-85. 10.1016/j.jeca.2004.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2004.02.004

Shakouri, B. &Yazdi, S. (2012). Granger Causality Relationship between Mining Exports and GDP Growth in Iran. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences,6(12), 429-435.

Singh, T. (2015). Trade openness and economic growth in Canada: An evidence from time-series tests. Global Economy Journal, 15(3),361-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gej-2014-0009

Sun, P. & Heshmati, A. (2010). International Trade and its Effect on Economic Growth in China. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5151, The Institute for the Study of Labour, Germany. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp5151.pdf

Were, M. (2015). Differential effects of trade on economic growth and investment: A cross-country empirical investigation, Journal of African Trade 2:1-2, 71–85, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2015.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joat.2015.08.002

Zestos, G.K. & Tao, X. (2002). Trade and GDP Growth: Causal Relations in the United States and Canada. Southern Economic Journal, 68(4), 859-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1061496

Downloads

Published

2020-10-26

How to Cite

Singh, K., & Kumar, A. (2020). EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF INDIA’S FOREIGN TRADE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(10), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i10.2020.1805