COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE BASED BEHAVIOUR OF MOMENT RESISTING FRAMES WITH STRUCTURAL SHEAR WALLS, CONCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES & BUCKLE RESISTING BRACED FRAMES

Authors

  • Mirza Amir Baig Professor& Advisor, Civil Engineering Deptt., Al-Falah University, Faridabad, India
  • Adeeb Ur Rehman Student of M.Tech in Structure & Foundation, Al-Falah University, Faridabad, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i9.2020.1442

Keywords:

Moment Resisting Frames (MRF), Structural Shear Walls (SSW), Concentric Braced Frames (CBF), Buckle Resisting Braced Frames(BRBF), American Society for Civil Engineers (ASCE), ETABS

Abstract [English]

Performance evaluation and design of civil facilities against earthquakes is a challenge to engineers because of the large uncertainty in the seismic demand and capacity of structures. The purpose of the study is to perform comparative analytical investigation of performance-based behavior between Moment Resisting Frames with Structural shear Walls, Concentric Braced Frames & Buckle Resisting Braced Frames of a concrete structure by using ETABS-2017 software. The comparative analytical evaluation of the study will be based on the parameters such as displacement, inter-story drift, pushover curve and life expectancy level. The purpose of the study is to obtain a structural system which is more efficient, reliable and strong in its nature and strength.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures IS 1893:2016.

IS456-2000PlainandReinforcedConcrete-IndianStandardcodeofpractice for general structural use of plain and reinforced concrete.

IS 800-2000, Indian Standard code of practice for steel. M. R. Banihashami, A. R. Mirzagoltabar, H. R. Tavakoli, July 2015.

Ryan A Kersting, Larry A Fahnestak, Walterio A Lopez 2015.

ZasiahTafheem et al (2013)

Viswanath K.G et al (2010)

Chui-Hsin Chen et al (2008)

D. Roke et al (2008)

A.Y. Elghazouli et al (2008)

Luigi DI SARNO et al (2004)

Rafael Sabelli et al (2003)

FEMA-356, pre-standard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildingsFederalEmergencyFederalAgencyWashingtonDC,2000.

FEMA-440 (2205) “Improvement of Nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, U.S.A.

Rahul RANA1, Limin JIN2 and Atila ZEKIOGLU: “PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF A 19 STORY CONCRETE SHEAR WALL building”

T. Venkat Das Assistant Professor civil engineering KL University, GUNTUR India 2016: “Push Over Analysis for Concrete Structures at

Sesimic Zone-3 using Etabs Software”

Abdallah Yacine Rahmani1 • Nouredine Bourahla1 • Rita Bento2 • Mohamed Badaoui 2016: “An improved upper-bound pushover procedure for seismic assessment of high-rise moment resisting steel frames” DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0204-9

Alexis Nzapfakumunsi: “Seismic design evaluation of T shaped irregular RC building plans by using pushover analysis”

Dokumen.tips_star seismic buckling restrained braces for ETABS

Downloads

Published

2020-09-29

How to Cite

Baig, M. A., & Rehman, A. U. (2020). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERFORMANCE BASED BEHAVIOUR OF MOMENT RESISTING FRAMES WITH STRUCTURAL SHEAR WALLS, CONCENTRIC BRACED FRAMES & BUCKLE RESISTING BRACED FRAMES. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 8(9), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i9.2020.1442