THE IMPACT OF LIBERALIZATION OF ASEAN AIR TRANSPORTATION ON INDONESIAN AIRLINES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i9.2019.616Keywords:
Air Transport, Liberalization, Indonesian AirlinesAbstract [English]
Liberalisation of air transportation practically is known as open sky policy. In the practice, the liberalisation of air transportation is divided into two group of services, i.e.: air transportation services, for passengers and goods (air service) which is categorized as hard rights and supporting services of the air transportation services (ancillary services) which is categorized as soft rights. The research in this paper focused in air transportation services for passengers and goods, consists of nine freedom of the air. The impact of the policy such as the Agreement regarding ASEAN open sky policy, is the readiness of Indonesian air transportation companies to compete with foreign air transportation companies. The government of Indonesia has to regulate the implementation of ASEAN Open Sky Policy to be projected in order to comply with national development, i.e. the function of air law in national development. The policy has been implemented by enact or amend the existing law as air law that regulate flight lines, the following provisions: To regulate flight line for foreign airlines to open flight lines in Indonesia region which may not or have not land and sea transportation. The regulation is intended to support mobility of humans, goods and services that may fulfil the needs of the people of Indonesia, which materially and spiritually and the development of the region. The regulation of flight lines of foreign air transportation for region of tourism, industrial and trade center. The regulation is intended to support the national economic development of Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Brueckner, J.K. and Whelen W.T. (2000), The price effect of international airline alliances, Journal of Law and Economics, 43, 503-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467464
Clougherty, J.A. and Zhang, A. (2009), Domestic Rivalry and Export Performance: Theory and Evidence from International Airline Markets, Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(2), pp 440-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01515.x
Hummels, D. (2006), Global Trends in Trade and Transportation, ECMT-OECD Paper presented in the 17th International Symposium on Theory and Practice in Transport Economics and Policy, Berlin, 25-27 October 2006.
General Accountability Office (GAO, 2008), Airline Industry: Potential Mergers and Acquisitions Driven by Financial and Competitive Pressures, GAO-08-845 July 31, 2008.
Harrigan, J. (2005), Airplanes and Comparative Advantage, NBER Working Paper No. 11688.
Clougherty, J.A. (2002), US Domestic Airline Mergers: The Neglected International Determinants, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 557-576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00107-7
Borenstein, S. and Rose, N.L., (2007), How Airline Markets Work…or do they? Regulatory Reform in the Airline Industry, NBER Working Paper 13452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w13452
Button, K. (1998), Opening U.S. Skies to Global Airline Competition, Trade Policy Analysis, Trade Policy Analysis, Nov.24.
Piermartini, R. and Rousova, L. (2008), Liberalization of Air Transport Services and Passenger Traffic, World Trade Organization - Economic Research and Statistics Division, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2008-06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1315204
Zhang, A., Hanaoka, S., Inamura, H. and Ishikura, T. (2009), Low Cost Carriers in Asia: Deregulation, Regional Liberalization and Secondary Airports, Research in Transport Economics, Vol. 17, forthcoming.
Lee, D., and Prado, M. J. (2005), The Impact of Passenger Mix on Reported “Hub Premiums” in the U.S. Airline Industry, Southern Economic Journal, 72, pp.372-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20062116
Oum, T.H. and Yu, C. (1998). Winning Airlines: Productivity and Cost Competitiveness of the World's Major Airlines, Kluwer Academic Press, New York, London; 1998), 240 pages. http://www.wkap.nl/prod/b/0-7923-8010-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5481-3
Boeing (Boeing Commercial Aircrafts) (2008), Review of Boeing Commercial Airplanes Long-term Airplane Market Forecast Methodology and Airlines’s Underlying Requirement for Economic Profits, public distribution version.
Richards, K., (1996), The Effect of Southwest Airlines on US Airline Markets. Research in Transportation Economics, 4, pp.33-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(96)80004-7
US DOT, (1993), The Airline Deregulation Evolution Continues: The Southwest Effect, Office of Aviation Analysis, US Department of Transportation.
Kusumaatmadja, M. “WTO Agreement Regarding International Trade in Services (GATS) Viewed from the Perspective of Developing Countries”, paper in International Commerce Upgrading Activities Law, Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran 28, July- August 8, 1997.
Irwin, M. D. and Kasarda, J.D. (1991), Air Passenger Linkages and Employment Growth among U.S. Metropolitan Areas, American Sociological Review 56(4), 524-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2096272
Borenstein, S., (1989), Hubs and High Fares: Dominance and Market Power in the U.S. Airline Industry, RAND Journal of Economics 20, 344–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2555575
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.