FACTORS AFFECTING ON THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATORS' MANAGER CHOICE

Akın Erdemir; Ramazan Erdem

doi:10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i5.2019.837

Authors

Akın Erdemir Research and Application Hospital, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey
Ramazan Erdem Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i5.2019.837

Keywords:

Meritocracy, Perfectio, Manager Choice, Promoted on The Job

Abstract [English]

Motivation/Background: The aim of this research to evaluate that Public Perception on the Factors that Affecting Turkish Public Administrators' Manager Choice in Turkey.

Method: Quantitative research method was used in the research and the data obtained from the survey method were analyzed with SPSS (SPSS 16.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA).

Results: According to public perception, Turkish public administrators act in a favorable manner in the selection of managers.

Conclusions: According to the result of the research, participants think that the administrators in Turkish public sector mostly pay attention to the criteria for manager choice: relationship and citizenship factors, external influences and political factors and ethnicity and sect factors but they do not take representation and capability factors and merit criteria into account.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Çetinkaya, M., and Özutku, H., Yönetsel Performansa Yetkinlik Temelli Yaklaşım: Türk Otomotiv Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. Vol. 41, No. 1, 2012, 142-161.

Zaccaro, S. J., and Banks, D., Leader Visioning and Adaptability: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice on Developing The Ability to Manage Change. Human Resource Management Journal. Vol. 43, No. 4, 2004, 367-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20030

Shirazi, A. and Mortazavi, K., Effective Management Performance A Competency Based Perspective. İnternational Review of Business Research Papers. Vol. 5, No. 1, 2009, 4-10.

Kubica, A. J., Transcitioning Middle Managers. Healthcare Executive, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2008,58-60.

Broscio, M., and Scherer, J., Bulding Job Security: Strategies for Becoming A Highly Valued Contributor. Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2003, 147-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00115514-200305000-00003

Mooney, A., Core Competence, Distinctive Competence and Competitive Advantage: What Is the Difference? Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 83, No. 2, 2007, 110-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.2.110-115

Argüden, Y., Yönetim Kurulu Sırları. İstanbu: Rota Yayın Yapım Tanıtım Tic. Ltd. Şti., 2007, 10.

Kan, İ., Biyoistatistik, Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Basımevi, 1998.

Can, A., SPSS ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi (in Turkish). Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/9786053644484

Akgül, A. and Çevik, O., İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri (in Turkish). Ankara: Emek Ofset, 2005.

Seçer, İ., SPSS ve LİSREL ile Pratik Veri Analizi (in Turkish). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık, 2013.

Kalaycı, Ş., SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri (in Turkish). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 2008.

Sipahi, B., Yurtkoru, S., and Çinko, M., Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS’le Veri Analizi (in Turkish). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları, 2006.

Bozkurt, Ö., Ergun, T., and Sezen, S., Kamu Yönetimi Sözlüğü. Ankara:TODAİE Yayını, 2011, 145.

Ak, M. and Sezer, Ö., Kamu Personel Sisteminde Çalışanların Görevde Yükselmesinde Kayırmacılık Sorunu. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 23, Special Issue in memory of Geybulla Ramazanoğlu, 2018, 739-757.

Ünal, A. K., & Aydoğan, E., Kamu Hastanelerindeki Sağlık Yöneticilerinin Yetkinlikleri. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2018, 520-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2018.486

Rauch, J. and Evans, P. Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2000, 49-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4

Günay, Ö. F., Üst Düzey Kamu Yöneticilerinin Yetiştirilmesi, Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara Üniversitesi, 2004, 79.

Huber, J. D., & Mccarty, N., Bureaucratic Capacity,Delegation, and Political Reform. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 98, No. 3, 2004, 481-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001297

Haque, M., Incongruity Between Bureaucracy and Society in Developing Nations: A Critique. Peace & Change, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1997, 432–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0149-0508.00061

Büte, M., Nepotizmin İş Stresi, İş Tatmini, Olumsuz Söz Söyleme Ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerine Etkileri: Aile İşletmeleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2011, 177-194.