METAFICTITONAL NARRATIVE QUALITIES OF CHIMERA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i12.2018.1105Keywords:
Metafiction, Heteroglossia, Mythology, Pedagogy of Writing, OriginalityAbstract [English]
This paper seeks to discern the narratological aspects of John Barth's famous essay titled “Literature of Exhaustion” in narrative qualities of his own novel, Chimera. Different narrative elements are discussed in the process of reading the essay; they include “The Construction and Deconstruction of Illusions in Chimera”, “The Orchestration of Polyphony of Voices”, “The Decadence of Mythology” and “Barth’s Success in the Pedagogy of Writing”. Each concept will be discussed in a separate section. The first section aims to discuss the concept of metafiction. Barth tries to represent the clash between real and represented worlds to confirm the fact that the boundary between reality and fiction becomes vague in the process of the novel. The second section focuses on "Heteroglossia" as one of the major themes of the novel. All of the characters represent Barth's voice in Chimera. The third section examines the influence of mythology and its decadence. The author attempts to advance a new method of writing by the traditional mimic forms and intertexual games. The last section intends to examine Barth's pedagogy of writing. He tries to create new fictions out of what already has been said in the world of fiction. The article concludes that Chimera is a rich postmodern novel that can be a role-model for writers to avoid originality and writer's block in writing.
Downloads
References
Allen, Graham. 2000. Intertextuality. New York / London. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203131039
Anonymous, One Thousand and One Arabian Nights. 1973. Trans. N. J. Dawood Harmondsworth: Penguin,
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1973. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetica. Ann Arbor, Ardis.
Bakhtin, Mikhail.1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. London. University of Minnesota Press.Minneapolis
Barth, John. 2015. Chimera” London. Dalkey achieve press publication.
Barth, John. 2002. The Literature of Exhaustion. In Bran Nicol, ed. Postmodernism and The Contemporary Novel: A Reader. Edinburgh University Press. 47-138
Barth, John.1980. The Literature of Replenishment, Atlantic Monthly 66.
Barth, John. 1984. The Friday books. New York. John Hopkins University Press.
Barth, John. 1956. The Floating Opera and the End of the Road. New York. Achor Books.
Barthes, Roland. 1975. An Introduction to the Structural analysis of NarrativeIn: id. “On Narrative and Narratives”. London. The John Hopkins university press. Pp.: 237-272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/468419
Bosted, Finn/ Brandist, Craig/ Sigfred,Evenson Lars/ Faber, Hege Charlotte. 2004. Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language and Culture. Meaning in Language, Art and New Media. London/ NewYork. Palgrave Macmallin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230005679
Burt, Warren. 2000. Critical Vices the Myth of Postmodern Theory. London. Routledge.
Currie, Mark. 1995. Metafiction. London/ New York. Routledge.
Dickstein, Morris.1976. Fiction Hot and Kool; Dilemmas of the Experimental Writer. Reprinted in Bill Henderson. The Pushcart Prize: Best of the Small Presses. New York, Avon Books, Pp 309-323.
Eco, Umberto.1985. Reflections on The Name of the Rose. London, Secker & Warburg.
Gibson, John/ Huemer, Wolfgang/ Luca, Pocci. 2007. A Sense of the World. Essays on Fiction, Narrative and Knowledge. London/ New York. Routledge.
Hoffman, L. & Kurzenberger, M. (2008). Premodern, modern, and postmodern ways of interpreting the miraculous and mental illness from religious and psychological perspectives. In H. Ellens (Ed.), Miracles: God, science, and psychology in the paranormal (Vol. 3, pp. 65-93). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Hutcheon, Linda. 1988. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory Fiction. London/ New York. Routledge.
Hutcheon, Linda. 2013. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Paradox. London. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Keen, Suzanne. 2003. “Narrative Form”. London. Anthony Rowe Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230503489
Lyotard, Jean Francois.1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
May, R. (1991). The cry for myth. New York: Dell.
McHale, Brian.1975. Postmodernist Fiction. London/ New York. Routledge.
Murdoch, Iris.1977. Against Dryness. New York. Yale Review.
Nicole, Bran. 2009. Postmodern Fiction. New York. Cambridge University Press.
Plimpton, George. 1985. The Art of Fiction LXXXVI: John Barth. Paris Review 144-159.
Reilly, Charlie. 1981. An Interview with John Barth. Contemporary Literature. Pp: 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1208219
Robbe-Grillet, Alain.1973. Project for a revolution in New York. Richard Howard, London, Calder and boyers.
Robbe-Grillet, Alain.1965. La Maison de rendez-vous.trans. Richard Howard. New York. Grove Press.
Stewart, Susan (1979) Nonsense: Aspects of Intertextuality in Folklore and Literature. Baltimore, Md, and London.
Waugh, Patricia. 1984. Metafiction, The Theory and Practice of Self-conscious Fiction. London/NewYork. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1771928
Wilde, Alan (1981) Horizons of Assent: Modernism, Postmodernism, and the Ironic Imagination, Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Zappen, James P. 2004. The Rebirth of Dialogue. Bakhtin, Socrates, and the Rhetorical Tradition.New York. State University of New York Press.
Ziegler, Heide. 1989. John Barth. New York/ London. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
