HOBBES AND SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE IN THE LEVIATHAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i7.2018.1304Keywords:
Hobbes, Scientific Practice, Experimentation, Geometry, Motion, Maker's KnowledgeAbstract [English]
Hobbes in the seventeenth century (1639 - 1668), we must emphasize that suggests that taste or infatuation for science bodies (physical), because as he reminds us at the end of the leviathan in 1651; you are happy to return to their initial speculations about (De Corpore) natural bodies. (Hobbes Leviatã, 2003, p. 22). Such luck with these initial observations, we used to locate a context of discussion on the topic of science in the seventeenth century in England, specifically in one of the authors as Kuhn; in late modernity, they propose a new paradigm of scientific knowledge as had been developed by the Scholastics; perhaps its medieval metaphysical knowledge. However, much it has been written about this particular issue. Excuses are many references to the subject in the person of Hobbes; as one of the first authors who knew how to take the first steps on what we now know as science in particular. I do not use science or sacred metaphysical arguments; but he wanted to investigate or propose arguments away from religion to build what was known as truth, from other fundamental axes; different to the subject of God.
Downloads
References
BRANDT, F. (1928). Thomas Hobbes: Mechanical Conception of Nature. London: Librarie Hachette.
COOPER, JE (25 April 2016). Vainglory, Modesty, and Political Agency in Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan. Retrieved from Political Theory Workshop: http://users.polisci.wisc.edu/polphil/Cooper_Vainglory%20and%20Modesty%20in%20Leviathan.pdf
Frateschi, Y. (2008). A physics gives policy. Hobbes against Aristotle. Campinas: Unicamp.
HARWOOD, JT (1986). The rhetorics of Thomas Hobbes and Bernard Lamy. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University.
HILL, C. (1987). O mondo ponta - cabeça. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
HOBBES, T. (1989). Leviathan. Matter, form and power of an ecclesiastical and civil state. (C. Didymus, Trans.) Madrid: Alianza University.
HOBBES, T. (1839). Opera Philosophica quoe latinae scripsit omnia nunc primum in unum corpus collecta (Vol. II). (Molesworth G., Ed.) Londini: Apud Joannen Boiin.
Hobbes, T. (2000). Treaty body. Madrid: Trotta.
KATTLAN, M. (2009). Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Makin. Los Angeles, California: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412971980
KIEL, D. (2009). Knowledge mangement, Organizational Learning and Intelligence, and Complexity (Vol. 3). Oxford: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (ELSS) UNESCO.
KUHN, T. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Third Edition ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
LAVE, J., & WENGER, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
LLOYD, S. (2013). The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
MALCOLM, N. (2002). Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247145.001.0001
Martinich, AP (1992). The Two Gods of Leviathan, Religion on Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624810
Molesworth, WB (1840). The Inglés Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malesbury (Vol. 4). London: John Bohn.
Neufeld, CB, Brust PG & STEIN, LM (2011). epistemological bases gives experimental cognitive psychology. Psychology: Theory and Research, 103-112.
Paganini, G. (2003). Hobbes, Valla and the Trinity. British Journal for the History, 183-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960878032000104822
PEYCHAUX, DF (2013). The Leviathan as Automaton: method and politics in Thomas Hobbes. Seminar annals of history of philosophy, 413-430.
Shapin, S., & SCHAFFER, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
SKINNER, Q. (1996). Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598579
Sorell, T. (1996). The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521410193
Spragens, JT (1973). The politics of motion. The world of Thomas Hobbes. Kentucky: University Press.
Springborg, P. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes'S LEVIATHAN. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521836670
TABAK, J. (2004). Geometry: the languaje and form. New York: Facts On File, Inc.
TUCK, R. (2002). Hobbes. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192802552.001.0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
