SOCIAL CAPITAL CLASSIFICATION OF SEAWEED CULTIVATORS (CASE STUDY IN LIYA MAWI VILLAGE, SOUTH WANGI-WANGI DISTRICT IN WAKATOBI REGENCY, INDONESIA)

Authors

  • Ine Fausayana Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • La Nalefo Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Samsul Alam Fika Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Dian Aris Ani Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i6.2018.1341

Keywords:

Trust, Network, Norm, Selling and Income

Abstract [English]

Social capital plays a vital role in a business as so does in seaweed cultivation. The aims of this study are to know the social capital of cultivators and to analyze the relation of social capital toward business successfulness of seaweed cultivators in Liya Mawi village. The variable of the study is social capital, such as trust, network, and norm; and business achievement based on sales volume and income. This study used the descriptive analysis and correlation test with rank spearman correlation test. The result of this study showed that the social capital of seaweed cultivators in Liya Mawi village are in the medium category to high at around 44.68% have medium level of trust and 55.32% have a high trust level and there is no respondents who have a level of low trust category; Networking category is as high as 42.55% and 57.45%, and there are no farmers are included in the category of low network; and the level of compliance with the norm being as much as 23.40% and a high level of norms compliance as much as 76.60%, while for the low category does not exist. The results of data analysis showed that social capital has a relationship with the level of success of the venture, while the views of the elements of social capital, only the network level that has a relationship with the level of business successfulness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourdieu, Pierre., 1986. The forms of capital. In: Jonh G. Richardson (ed) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Coleman, JS., 1994. A rational choice perspective on economic sociology. In: Smelser, NJ and Swedberg, R. (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. New York: Princeton University Press.

Fausayana, I., Salman D., Ali SSA., Darma R., Sirajuddin N. 2015. Habitus of Etnic Bajo Bungin. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture ISSN: 1995-0748 2015 Marchl 9(3): pages 1-9.

Fausayana I., Abdullah WG, Susanti F., Sidu D., Arimbawa P., Yunus L. 2017. Factors Affecting the Behavior of Farmers Toward the Risk of Seaweed Farming in the Bungin Permai village, southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux, Vol 10(6): 1647-1653.

Fukuyama, F. 2001. Sosial Capital, Civil Society, and development. Third Word Quarterly. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713701144

Hansen BG and Greve A. 2015. The Role Of Human And Social Capital In Dairy Farming. Rural Society. Vol 24 (2) : 154-176

Hoyman M., McCall J., Paarlberg L., Brennan J. 2016. Considering the Role of Social Capital for Economic Development Outcomes in U.S. Counties. Economic Development Quarterly. Vol 30 (4): 342-357

Limon JAG., Toscano EV., Fernandez FEG. 2014. Farmers' Contribution to Agricultural Social Capital: Evidence from Southern Spain. Rural Sociology. Vol 79 (3): 380 – 410.

Lopez, A.F., Catarina, R.P., Tiago, N.S. 2012. When Sociable Workers Pay-Off: Can Firms Internalize sosial Capital Eksternalities. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 23, 127-136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2012.01.004

Munajar, A. 2007.Hubungan Perilaku Kewirausahaan dengan Keberhasilan Usaha pada Pembudidaya Ikan Jaring Apung di Waduk Cirata Kabupaten Cianjur.Skripsi.FPIPS UPI Bandung.

Putnam, R D. 1993. The Prosperous Community: Sosial Capital and Public Life. The American Prospect No. 13 Spring.

Sharp JS and Smith MB. 2003. Social capital and farming at the rural–urban interface: the importance of nonfarmer and farmer relations. Agricultural Systems. Vol 76 (3) : 913 – 927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00083-5

Shideler DW and Kraybill DS. 2009. Social Capital: An Analysis of Factors Influencing Investment. The Journal of Socio Economic. Vol 38 (3): 443 – 455

Ville ASS., Uli Locher GMH., Philip LE. 2016. Exploring the role of social capital in influencing knowledge flows and innovation in smallholder farming communities in the Caribbean. Vol 8 (3): 535 – 549.

Weaver RD and Habibov N. 2012. Social Capital, Human Capital, and Economic Well-Being in the Knowledge Economy: Results from Canada's General Social Survey. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare. Vol 39 (2): 31 – 51.

Wolz A., Fritzsch J., Reinsberg K. 2005. The Impact of Social Capital on Farm and Household Income: Results of a Survey among Individual Farmers in Poland. Paper prepared for presentation at the 94th EAAE Seminar ‘from households to firms with independent legal status: the spectrum of institutional units in the development of European agriculture, Ashford (UK), 9-10 April 2005. pp 1-13.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Fausayana, I., Nalefo, L., Fika, S. A., & Ani, D. A. (2018). SOCIAL CAPITAL CLASSIFICATION OF SEAWEED CULTIVATORS (CASE STUDY IN LIYA MAWI VILLAGE, SOUTH WANGI-WANGI DISTRICT IN WAKATOBI REGENCY, INDONESIA). International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 6(6), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v6.i6.2018.1341