PREFERENCE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN KONGUMANDALAM REGION

Authors

  • Dr.C.Barathi Research Supervisor, Assistant Professor of Education, School of Education, Tamilnadu Open University, Chennai, India
  • Mr.A.Naveen Part Time Ph.D Research Scholar, Department of Education, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i8(SE).2017.2241

Keywords:

Preference of English Language Teaching Methods and Techniques, Prospective Teachers and Kongumandalam Region

Abstract [English]

The present study is made on “Preference of English language teaching methods and techniques of prospective teachers in Kongumandalam Region”.  A sample of 847 prospective teachers from 41 B.Ed colleges in Kongumandalam region who were studying English pedagogy as main subject has been selected based on simple random sampling technique. This will constitute 71.65 (847/1182) percentage of sample from the total population. A normative research method and survey technique has been adopted. The descriptive statistical analysis shows that the prospective teachers belonging to Coimbatore district had higher preference of English language teaching methods and techniques, and high personality traits and Nilgiris district had high styles of learning and thinking. The level of preference of English teaching methods and techniques, personality traits and style of learning and thinking of prospective teachers was average for the whole sample and sub-sample.  The regression statistical analysis had shown that daily newspaper reading, personality traits and speaking in English were the strong predictors of preference of English language teaching methods and techniques of prospective teachers in the Kongumandalam region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agnihotri, R.K., & Khanna, A.L. (1995). English Language Teaching In India: Issues and Innovations. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Benbia Hakima. (2013). Bridging Teaching Methods and Techniques to Learning Styles and strategies. An unpublished dissertation of Master Degree in Science of Languages, Department of Foreign Languages, Biskra University, Algeria.

Deyuan He, & Lindsay Miller. (2011). The English teacher preference: the case of China’s non-English-major students. Journal of World Englishes, 30(3), PP- 428–443, ISSN:0883-2919.

Golden, S. A. R. (2017). Recent Research in Social Sciences & Humanities. EduPedia Publications (P) Ltd.

Golden, S. A. R. (2016). Rural Students’ attitude Towards English As Medium Of Instruction In Higher Education– An Analysis. International Journal of Research, 3, 1-10.

Golden, S. A. R. (2017). Attitude of Students and Teachers towards E-Learning-An Analysis. Recent Research in Social Science & Humanities, 1, 5-10.

John.W.Best, & Khan.V.James.(1990), Research in Education, New Delhi: Prantice Hall of India. Pvt. Ltd.

Naveen .A. (2014). Preference of English teaching Methods and Techniques of Prospective Teachers. International Journal of Pedagogical Studies, 2(1), PP-51-54, ISSN:2321-2306.

Naveen .A. (2015). English Language Teaching Practices and Techniques in Higher Education. Dimensions of Education, 4(4), PP-16-21, ISSN: 2249-2437.

Naveen.A., & Barathi.C. (2016). Style of Learning and Thinking of Prospective Teachers. International Journal of Pedagogical Studies, 4(1), PP-51-54, ISSN:2321-2306.

Patricia Robledo Ramon. (2010). Thinking and learning styles among teaching and psycho pedagogy students: differences according to course and speciality. Journal of Escritos de Psicología, 3(3), PP - 27­36, ISSN: 1138­2635.

Regi, S. B., & Golden, S. A. R. (2014). A Study On Educational Loan Availed By Students In Trichy City. JournalOf International Academic Research For Multidisciplinary (Jiarm), 2 (1).

Reynolds, C.R., & Torrance, E.P. (1978). Perceived Changes in styles of learning and thinking (Hemisphericity) through Direct and Indirect Training”, Journal of creative behaviour, V.12, PP-245-52.

Sathiyagirirajan. (2010). Manual for Personality Traits inventory.

Seetharamanan, D. & Rajasekar,S. (2014). A study on Effectiveness of B.Ed Student Teachers in relation to Teaching Aptitude Hemisphericity Cognitive style and Academic profienciency, Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Department of Education, Annamalai University.

Torrance, E.P. & Reynolds, C.R. (1980). Technical manual for style of learning and thinking, form. C. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

Torrance,E.P.(1982). Hemisphericity and creativity. Journal of research and development in education. 15(3), 29-37

Torrance, E.P. (1988). Style of learning and thinking administrator's manual. Bensenville, Illonois: Scholastic Testing Service.

Venkataramanan, S.D. (1990). A study on activation of right hemisphere for creativity development by shifting hemisphericity preference of style of learning and thinking, with the help of synthetics techniques. M.Ed. Thesis, unpublished data, Madras University.

Venkataraman, D. (1994). Manual Styles of Learning and Thinking -Manual of Inventory, Psy.-com. Services, Delhi, V.33, PP-111-118.

Venkataraman (2008). Impact of creativity training on hemisphericity dominance of students. University News, 46(24), ISSN 0566 – 2257, PP- 5-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-31

How to Cite

Barathi, C., & Naveen, A. (2017). PREFERENCE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS IN KONGUMANDALAM REGION. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 5(8(SE), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i8(SE).2017.2241