A REVIEW ON ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SHELTER RECONSTRUCTION AFTER GORKHA EARTHQUAKE 2015 IN NEPAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i12.2017.476Keywords:
Shelter Reconstruction, Raw Materials, Damage, Survivors, Tranches, SustainabilityAbstract [English]
A study on “Issues associated with the shelter reconstruction after Gorkha Earthquake 2015 in Nepal” was conducted during the period of March to September 2017 on the basis of secondary literature received from different sources and field observation. Various articles, journal and government documents retrieved from online research database like ‘Google Scholars’ and topic related government online sites were reviewed. It has been realized that reconstruction after disasters is a long process. To manifest and implement the notion of build back better and successful completion of shelter reconstruction projects, there is a need for an in-depth knowledge of construction project management because 600,000 houses are to be constructed and about 250,000 to be repaired and retrofitted as well. The study reveals that the lack of funding, construction materials, labors and experienced human resources hinder the smooth progress of reconstruction. Similarly, reconstruction projects can take place only when the affected people are also involved in the design and planning process as well as in the implementation phase of the project, ensuring the best utilization of local knowledge and resources as much as possible. The strong coordination among various stakeholders can act as the key to an effective reconstruction in the context of Nepal.
Downloads
References
National Planning Commission. Nepal Human Development Report, . Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2014.
Hossain A, Adhikari TL, Ansary MA, Bari QH. Characteristics and consequence of Nepal earthquake 2015: a review. Geotechnical Engineering journal of the SEAGS & AGSSFA. 2015; 46:114-20.
Dixit AM editor Promoting safer building construction in Nepal. Thirteen World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Paper; 2004.
Ministry of Home Affairs & Disaster Preparedness Network Nepal. Nepal Disaster Report 2015. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2015.
Ministry of Home Affairs. National Disaster Response Framework (NDRF), . Kathmandu: Government of Nepal 2013.
Wald L. A small Push to Mount Everest, : United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2015. Available from: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/everyone/nepal2015/.
Ministry of Home Affairs. Situation Updates as of 5th May 2015, . In: Government of Nepal, editor. Kathmandu2015.
National Planning Commission. Post Disaster Needs Assessment. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2015.
National Reconstruction Authority. Survey of Private Housing Grant Distribution. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2017
Department of Urban Development and Building Construction. Design Catalogue for Reconstruction of Earthquake Resistant Building, . In: Ministry of Urban Development and Building Construction, editor. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal,; 2016.
Department of Urban Development and Building Construction. Design Catalogue for Earthquake Resistant Building. In: Ministry of Urban Development and Building Construction, editor. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2017
Davidson CH, Johnson C, Lizarralde G, Dikmen N, Sliwinski A. Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat international. 2007;31(1):100-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.08.003
Disaster Preparedness Network Nepal. History of Earthquakes in Nepal, Kathmandu2015 [cited 2015]. Available from: https://www.dpnet.org.np/index.php?pageName=earthquake.
Goda K, Kiyota T, Pokhrel RM, Chiaro G, Katagiri T, Sharma K, et al. The 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake: insights from earthquake damage survey. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2015; 1:8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2015.00008
Van Berlaer G, Staes T, Danschutter D, Ackermans R, Zannini S, Rossi G, et al. Disaster preparedness and response improvement: comparison of the 2010 Haiti earthquake-related diagnoses with baseline medical data. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017; 24(5):382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000387
National Reconstruction Authority (Unofficially translated by Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform HRRP Nepal). Grant Distribution for Completely destroyed private Houses by 2015 Earthquake, . Kathmandu: Government of Nepal, ; 2015.
Stedronsky S, Johnsen M. Rebuilding a more resilient Nepal: University of Stavanger, Norway; 2017.
Krüger F, Bankoff G, Cannon T, Orlowski B, Schipper ELF. Cultures and disasters: understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction: Routledge; 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797809
Dixit AM, Parajuli YK, Guragain R, editors. Indigenous skills and practices of earthquake resistant construction in Nepal. Proc 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2004.
Quarantelli E. Sheltering and Housing after Major Community Disasters: Case Studies and General Observations. OHIO STATE UNIV RESEARCH FOUNDATION COLUMBUS, 1982.
Flinn B, Beresford P. Post-Sidr Fam ily Shelter Reconstruction Bangladesh. UNDP Report. 2009.
ZARGAR A. RECONSTRUCTION OF WAR-DAMAGED RURAL AREAS OF KHUZESTAN, IRAN.(VOLUMES I AND II). 1990.
Ali ZZH. Sustainable shelters for post disaster reconstruction: an integrated approach for reconstruction after the South Asia earthquake: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2007.
Chiu RL. 12 Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development. Housing and social change: East-west perspectives. 221: Routledge; 2003.
Lyons M, Schilderman T, Boano C. Building back better. delivering people-centred housing reconstruction at scale: Practical Action Pub; 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780440064
Shearer L. Evolution and Recovery: Adaptable Housing Reconstruction in Post Disaster Scenarios. 2011.
Hidayat B, Egbu C, editors. A literature review of the role of project management in post-disaster reconstruction. Procs 26th Annual ARCOM Conference; 2010: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Inam A. Planning for the unplanned: Recovering from crises in megacities: Routledge; 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870380
Ismail D, Majid TA, Roosli R, Ab Samah HN. A review of project management for post-disaster reconstruction project: from international NGOs (INGOs) perspective. Research in Civil and Environmental Engineering. 2014; 2(4):9.
Alexander D, editor planning for post-disaster reconstruction. I-Rec 2004 International Conference Improving Post-Disaster Reconstruction in Developing Countries; 2004.
Jha AK. Safer homes, stronger communities: a handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters: World Bank Publications; 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8045-1
Sanderson D, Ramalingam B. NEPAL EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE: Lessons for operational agencies. The active learning network for accountability and performance in Humanitarian action ALNAP. 2015.
Limoncu S, Celebioglu B. Post-disaster sustainable housing system in Turkey. Turkey,(available online http://www grif umontreal ca/pages/LIMONCU_Sevgul pdf [accessed on 25/05/2007]). 2006.
Erkelens P, Akkerman M, Cox M, de Haas T, Brouwer E, editors. Innovative shelter for disasters. Proceedings CIB World Congress; 2010.
Da Silva J, Lubkowski Z, Batchelor V. Lessons from Aceh: key considerations in post-disaster reconstruction: Practical Action Publishing Limited Warwickshire; 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780440606
Lin Moe T, Pathranarakul P. An integrated approach to natural disaster management: public project management and its critical success factors. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. 2006; 15(3):396-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560610669882
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
